Issue of Prostate Gland Size, Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, and Continence Revisited

Urology

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 417-420

  Milhoua, Paul M ^a   Koi, Philip T ^a   Lowe, Daniel ^a   Ghavamian, Reza ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 40649119474     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.036     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schuessler W.W., Kavoussi L.R., Clayman R.V., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 147 (1992) 246A abstract 130
2. Guillonneau B., el-Fettouh H., Baumert H., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169 (2003) 1261-1266
3. El-Feel A., Davis J.W., Deger S., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an analysis of factors affecting operating time. Urology 62 (2003) 314-318
4. Lein M., Stibane I., Mansour R., et al. Complications, urinary continence, and oncological outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies: experience at the Charite Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 1278-1282
5. Tooher R., Swindle P., Woo H., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of comparative studies. J Urol 175 (2006) 2011-2017
6. Ghavamian R., Knoll A., Boczko J., et al. Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience. Urology 67 (2006) 1241-1246
7. Dahl D.M., He W., Lazarus R., et al. Pathological outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. Urology 68 (2006) 1253-1256
8. Eastham J.A., Kattan M.W., Rogers E., et al. Risk factors for urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156 (1996) 1707-1713
9. Foley C.L., Bott S.R.J., Thomas K., et al. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates. BJU Int 92 (2003) 370-374
10. Lepor H., Nieder A.M., and Ferrandino M.N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol 166 (2001) 1729-1733
11. 3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 52 (1998) 631-636
12. Hsu E.I., Hong E.K., and Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Urology 61 (2003) 601-606
13. Donnellan S.M., Duncan H.J., MacGregor R.J., et al. Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology 49 (1997) 225-230
14. Singh A., Fagin R., Shah G., et al. Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173 (2005) 552-554
15. Chang C.M., Moon D., Gianduzzo T.R., et al. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 285-290
16. Bollens R., Vanden Bossche M., Roumeguere T., et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40 (2001) 65-69
17. Feneley M.R., Landis P., Simon I., et al. Today men with prostate cancer have larger prostates. Urology 56 (2000) 839-842
18. Freedland S.J., Isaacs W.B., Platz E.A., et al. Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 7546-7554
19. Link R.E., Su L.M., Sullivan W., et al. Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173 (2005) 175-179
20. Poulakis V., Witzsch U., de Vries R., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 1341-1348
21. Eden C.G., King D., Kooiman G.G., et al. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does the approach matter?. J Urol 172 (2004) 2218-2223
22. Erdogru T., Teber D., Frede T., et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using matchpair analysis. Eur Urol 46 (2004) 312-319
23. Cambio A.J., and Evans C.P. Minimising postoperative urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 903-913
24. Myers R.P. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28 (2001) 473-490
25. Sacco E., Prayer-Galetti T., Pinto F., et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 97 (2006) 1234-1241
26. Rogers C.G., Su L.M., Link R.E., et al. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 176 (2006) 2448-2452
27. Konety B.R., Sadetsky N., Carroll P.R., et al. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume-analysis of data from the CaPSURE™ database. J Urol 177 (2007) 1423-1426
28. Terris M.K., and Stamey T.A. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. J Urol 145 (1991) 984-987