Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy

Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1253-1256

  Dahl, Douglas M ^a   He, Wenlei ^a   Lazarus, Ross ^b   McDougal, W Scott ^a   Wu, Chin Lee ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CHANNING LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GENERAL HOSPITAL; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ORGAN WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845310530     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1054     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schuessler W.W., Schulam P.G., Clayman R.V., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50 (1997) 854-857
2. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163 (2000) 1643-1649
3. Rassweiler J., Sentker L., Seemann O., et al. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40 (2001) 54-64
4. Dahl D.M., L'Esperance J.O., Trainer A.F., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 70 cases at a U.S. university medical center. Urology 60 (2002) 859-863
5. Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Creteil experience. Eur Urol 40 (2001) 38-45
6. Brown J.A., Garlitz C., Gomella L.G., et al. Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Urology 62 (2003) 481-486
7. Salomon L., Levrel O., de la Taille A., et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 42 (2002) 104-111
8. Salomon L., Anastasiadis A.G., Levrel O., et al. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 61 (2003) 386-390
9. Fromont G., Guillonneau B., Validire P., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary pathologic evaluation. Urology 60 (2002) 661-665
10. Walsh P.C., Lepor H., and Eggleston J.C. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4 (1983) 473-485
11. Rassweiler J., Seemann O., Schulze M., et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169 (2003) 1689-1693
12. Ohori M., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W., et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 154 (1995) 1818-1824
13. Epstein J.I. Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Clin North Am 23 (1996) 651-663
14. Han M., Partin A.W., Chan D.Y., et al. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol 171 (2004) 23-26
15. Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM, et al: Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 163: 1171-1177; quiz 1295, 2000.
16. Cheng L., Darson M.F., Bergstralh E.J., et al. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 86 (1999) 1775-1782
17. Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Civantos F., et al. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol 167 (2002) 2453-2456
18. Berger A.P., Volgger H., Rogatsch H., et al. Screening with low PSA cutoff values results in low rates of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 53 (2002) 241-245
19. Ung J.O., Richie J.P., Chen M.H., et al. Evolution of the presentation and pathologic and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed during the PSA era. Urology 60 (2002) 458-463
20. Abbou C.C., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 55 (2000) 630-634
21. Rassweiler J., Sentker L., Seemann O., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166 (2001) 2101-2108
22. Soderdahl D.W., Diaz J.I., Rabah D.M., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of specimen pathologic features to critically assess and modify surgical technique. Urology 66 (2005) 552-556
23. Salomon L., Levrel O., Anastasiadis A.G., et al. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5 (2002) 285-290