Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 193-197

  Charuvastra, A ^a   Marder, S R ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CHILD STUDY CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; ETHICS; FORECASTING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT SELECTION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

EID: 40649102000     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.018960     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 1982;5:319-29.
2. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 1987;17:20-4.
3. Dunn LB, Palmer BW, Keehan M, et al. Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:500-6.
4. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB 2004; 26:1-8.
5. Miller FG, Brody H. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Cent Rep 2003;33:19-28.
6. Glannon W. Phase I oncology trials: why the therapeutic misconception will not go away. J Med Ethics 2006;32:252-5.
7. Do Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, et al. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 2006; 313:684-7.
8. Dolan RJ. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 2002; 298:1191-4.
9. Callahan D. Principlism and communitarianism. J Med Ethics 2003;29:287-91.
10. Campbell AV. The virtues (and vices) of the four principles. J Med Ethics 2003;29:292-6.
11. Gillon R. Ethics needs principles-four can encompass the rest-and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals". J Med Ethics 2003;29:307-12.
12. Dunn LB, Palmer BW, Keehan M, et al. Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:500-6.
13. Fiske ST. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In: Gilbert DT, STF, GL, eds. The handbook of social psychology Vol 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998:357-411.
14. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev 1995;102:4-27.
15. Porter TM. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
16. Macklin R. Applying the four principles. J Med Ethics 2003;29:275-80.
17. Gillon R. Four scenarios. J Med Ethics 2003; 29:267-8.
18. Gillon R. Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required? J Med Ethics 2000;26:299-301.
19. Adolphs R. How do we know the minds of others? Domain-specificity, simulation, and enactive social cognition. Brain Res 2006;1079:25-35.
20. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Baye CL, et al. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces, Psychol Sci 2004;15:806-13.
21. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Gatenby JC, et al. Neural components of social evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 85:639-49.
22. Phelps EA, O'Connor KJ, Cunningham WA, et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J Cogn Neurosci 2000:12:729-38.
23. Winston JS, Strange BA, O'Doherty J, et al. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat Neurosci 2002;5:277-83.
24. Cunningham WA, Raye CL, Johnson MK. Implicit and explicit evaluation: FMRI correlates of valence, emotional intensity, and control in the processing of attitudes. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:1717-29.
25. Kunst-Wilson WR, Zajonc RB. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 1980;207:557-8.
26. Davis M, Whalen PJ. The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Mol Psychiatry 2001:6:13-34.
27. Adolphs R. Trust in the brain. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:192-3.
28. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio AR. The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 1998,393:470-4.
29. Amaral DG. The primate amygdala and the neurobiology of social behavior: implications for understanding social anxiety. Biol Psychiatry 2002,51:11-17.
30. Ida GM, Leibenluft E, Santiago N, et al. Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. Neuroimage 2004;22:1628-35.
31. Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, et al. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron 2001:32:537-51.
32. Critchley HD, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Neural activity in the human brain relating to uncertainty and arousal during anticipation. Neuron 2001;29:537-45.
33. Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, et al. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 1997;275:1293-5.
34. Rogers RD, Owen AM, Middleton HC, et al. Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 1999;19:9029-38.
35. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2000;10:295-307.
36. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, et al. Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 1996;6:215-25.
37. Kass NE, Sugarman J, Faden R, et al. Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Cent Rep 1996:26:25-9.