Two-dimensional magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using array spatial sensitivity encoding techniques in the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 223-229

  Mori, Harushi ^a   Aoki, Shigeki ^a   Masumoto, Tomohiko ^a   Yoshikawa, Takeharu ^a   Tago, Masao ^a   Shin, Masahiro ^b   Ohtomo, Kuni ^a   Kabasawa, Hiroyuki ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c GE Yokogawa Medical Systems   (Japan)

Author keywords

Intracranial hemodynamics; Magnetic resonance angiography; Sensitivity encoding; Temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM CHELATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CODING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; THICKNESS; TIME;

BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0036761389     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 175: 451-453, 2000.
2. Yoshikawa T, Aoki S, Hori M, et al. Time-resolved twodimensional thick-slice magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography in assessing brain tumors. Eur Radiol, 10: 736-744, 2000.
3. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21: 707-711, 2000.
4. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: Assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21: 1892-1899, 2000.
5. Kauczor HU, Engenhart R, Layer G, et al. 3D TOF MR angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 17: 184-190, 1993.
6. Wilcock DJ, Jaspan T, Worthington BS. Problems and pitfalls of 3-D TOF magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial circulation. Clin Radiol, 50: 526-532, 1995.
7. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology, 191: 155-164, 1994.
8. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med, 42: 952-962, 1999.
9. Wang Y. Description of parallel imaging in MRI using multiple coils. Magn Reson Med, 44: 495-499, 2000.
10. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. Cardiac real-time imaging using SENSE. SENSitivity Encoding scheme. Magn Reson Med, 43: 177-184, 2000.
11. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrastenhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging, 12: 671-677, 2000.
12. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 15: 1401-1407, 1994.
13. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R, et al. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A prospective study. Lancet, 354: 1594-1597, 1999.
14. Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ross JS, et al. Intracranial circulation: Preliminary clinical results with threedimensional (volume) MR angiography. Radiology, 171: 793-799, 1989.
15. Holland GA, Dougherty A, Carpenter JP, et al. Breathhold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 166: 971-981, 1996.
16. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, et al. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: Optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology, 203: 109-114, 1997.
17. Willig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: Preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-offlight MR angiography. Radiology, 208: 447-451, 1998.
18. Remonda L, Heid O, Schrogh G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: First-pass, gadoliniumenhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography-preliminary study. Radiology, 209: 95-102, 1998.
19. Slosman F, Stolpen AH, Lexa FJ, et al. Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: Evaluation of nonbreath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 170: 489-495, 1998.
20. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: Diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging, 8: 1066-1072, 1998.
21. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Vrachliotis TG, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with centric ordering in k space: A preliminary clinical experience in imaging the abdominal aorta and renal and peripheral arterial vasculature. J Magn Reson Imaging, 8: 603-615, 1998.
22. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J IH, et al. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrastenhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med, 40: 24-35, 1998.
23. Stehling MK, Niedermeyer M, Laub G. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Theory, technique and practical application. Radiologe, 37: 501-507, 1997.