Incidental predation, enemy-free space and the coexistence of incidental prey

Oikos

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 335-343

  Schmidt, Kenneth A ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; PREDATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

EID: 4043157855     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13093.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1988. How should resources be counted. - Theor. Pop. Biol. 29: 107-160.
2. Anderson, D. J. Apparent predator limited distribution of Galapagos red-footed boobies Sula sula. - Ibis 133:26-29.
3. Bonsall, M. B. and Hassell, M. P. 1997. Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages. - Nature 388: 371-373.
4. Brown, J. S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk and competition. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 37-47.
5. Brown, J. S. 1992. Patch use under predation risk: I. Models and predictions. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29: 301-309.
6. Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P. and Valone, T. J. 1994. Foraging under predation risk: a comparison of energetic and predation costs in a Negev and Sonoran desert rodent community. - Aust. J. Zool. 42: 435-448.
7. Brown, J. S., Laundré, J. W. and Gurung, M. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. - J. Mammal. 80: 385-399.
8. Chaneton, E. J. and Bonsall, M. B. 2000. Enemy-mediated apparent competition: empirical patterns and the evidence. - Oikos 88: 380-394.
9. Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. - Theor. Pop. Biol. 9: 129-136.
10. Chase, J. M., Abrams, P. A., Grover, J. P. et al. 2002. The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. - Ecol. Lett. 5: 302-315.
11. Connell, J. H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. - In: den Boer, P. J. and Gradwell, G. R. (eds), Dynamics of populations, Center for Agricultural Publication and Documentation. Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 298-312.
12. Courchamp, F., Langlais, M. and Sugihara, G. 2000. Rabbits killing birds: modelling the hyperpredation process. - J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 154-164.
13. Crowley, P. 1979. Predator-mediated coexistence: an equilibrium interpretation. - J. Theor. Biol. 80: 29-144.
14. Davidson, D. L. and Morris., D. W. 2001. Density-dependent foraging effort of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). - Funct. Ecol. 15: 575-583.
15. Estes, J., Crooks, K. and Holt, R. D. 2001. Predators, ecological role of. - In: Levin, S. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity, Vol 4, Academic Press, pp. 857-878.
16. Holling, C. S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European sawfly. - Can. Entomol. 91:293-320.
17. Holt, R. D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. - Theor. Pop. Biol. 12: 197-229.
18. Holt, R. D. 1987. Prey communities in patchy environments. - Oikos 50: 276-290.
19. Holt, R. D. 2001. Species coexistence. In: Levin, S. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity, Vol 5, Academic Press, pp. 413-426.
20. Holt, R. D. and Kotler, B. P. 1987. Short-term apparent competition. - Am. Nat. 130: 412-430.
21. Holt, R. D. and Lawton, J. H. 1994. The enological consequences of shared natural enemies. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 495-520.
22. Holt, R. D., Grover, J. and Tilman, D. 1994. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. - Am. Nat. 144: 741-771.
23. Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M. and Yamamura, N. 1981. Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. - Am. Nat. 117: 710-723.
24. Kawata, M. and Agawa, H. 1999. Perceptual scales of spatial heterogeneity of periphyton for freshwater snails. - Ecol. Lett. 2: 210-214.
25. Lawler, S. P. 1993. Direct and indirect effects in microcosm communities of protists. - Oecologia 93: 184-190.
26. Levin, S. A. 1970. Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. - Am. Nat. 104: 413-423.
27. Lewis, M. A. and Murray, J. D. 1993. Modelling territoriality and wolf-deer interactions. - Nature 366: 738-740.
28. Menge, B. A. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs - patterns and importance. - Ecol. Monogr. 65: 21-74.
29. Milinski, M. and Parker, G. A. 1991. Competition for resources. - In: Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B. (eds), Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd ed. Blackwell, pp. 137-168.
30. Mitchell, W. A. and Lima, S. L. 2002. Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey. - Oikos 99: 249-259.
31. Morgan, R. A., Brown, J. S. and Thorson, J. M. 1997. The effect of spatial scale on the functional response of fox squirrels. - Ecology 78: 1087-1097.
32. Murdoch, W. W. and Bence, J. 1987. General predators and unstable prey. - In: Kerfoot, W. C. and Sih, A. (eds), Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ. Press of New England, pp. 17-30.
33. Olsson, O. and Holmgren, N. M. A. 1999. Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behavior. I. Models with predictions. - Oikos 87: 251-263.
34. Pusenius, J. and Schmidt, K. A. 2002. The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles. - Oikos 98: 251-262.
35. Roemer, G. W., Donlan, C. J. and Courchamp, F. 2002. Golden eagles, feral pigs, and insular carnivore: how exotic specis turn native predators into prey. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99: 791-796.
36. Rogers, L. L., Mech, L. D., Dawson, D. K. et al. 1980. Deer distribution in relation to wolf pack territory edges. - J. Wildl. Manage. 44: 253-258.
37. Roughgarden, J. and Feldman, M. 1975. Species packing and predation pressure. - Ecology 56: 489-492.
38. Schauber, E. M. 2000. Models of mast seeding and its ecological effects on gypsy moth populations and Lyme disease risk. - Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Connecticut.
39. Schmidt, K. A. and Brown, J. S. 1996. Patch assessment in fox squirrels: the role of resource density, patch size, and patch boundaries. - Am. Nat. 147: 360-380.
40. Schmidt, K. A. and Ostfeld, R. S. 2003. Mice in space: space use predicts the interaction between mice and songbirds. - Ecology 84: 3246-3283.
41. Schmidt, K. A. and Whelan, C. J. 1998. Predator-mediated interactions between and within guilds of nesting songbirds: experimental and observational evidence. - Am. Nat. 52: 393-402.
42. Schmidt, K. A., Brown, J. S. and Morgan, R. A. 1998. Plant defenses as complementary resources: a test with squirrels. - Oikos 81: 130-142.
43. Schmidt, K. A., Goheen, J. R. and Naumann, R. 2001a. Incidental nest predation in songbirds: using behavioral indicators to determine ecological processes and scales. - Ecology 82: 2937-2947.
44. Schmidt, K. A., Goheen, J. R., Naumann, R. et al. 2001b. Experimental removals of strong and weak predators: mice and chipmunks preying on songbird nests. - Ecology 82: 2927-2936.
45. Sih, A. 1997. Game theory and predator preyt response races. - In: Dugatkin, L.A. and Reeve, H. K. (eds), Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 221-237.
46. Slobodkin, L. B. 1961. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY.
47. Spiller, D. A. and Schoener, T. W. 1998. Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. - Ecology 79: 503-516.
48. Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press.
49. Thorson, J. M., Morgan, R. A., Brown, J. S. et al. 1998. Direct and indirect cues of predatory risk and patch use by fox squirrels and thirteen-lined ground squirrels. - Behav. Ecol. 9: 157-161.
50. Tokeshi, M. 1998. Species coexistence: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. - Blackwell Science Inc.
51. Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. and Wells, J. F. 1992. Evidence of incidental nest predation and its effect on nests of threatened grassland birds. - Oikos 63: 281-288.
52. Werner, E. E. and Peacor, S. D. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. - Ecology 84: 1083-1100.
53. Yanes, M. and Suárez, F. 1996. Incidental nest predation and lark conservation in an Iberian semiarid shrubsteppe. - Conserv. Biol. 10: 881-887.