State-insensitive cooling and trapping of single atoms in an optical cavity

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 13, 2003, Pages

  McKeever, J ^a   Buck, J R ^a   Boozer, A D ^a   Kuzmich, A ^a   Nagerl H C ^a   Stamper Kurn, D M ^a   Kimble, H J ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESIUM; COOLING; ELECTRON TRAPS; GROUND STATE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; QUANTUM THEORY; RAMAN SCATTERING; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

DIPOLE FORCE TRAP; OPTICAL CAVITY; PROBE BEAM; SINGLE ATOMS; TRAP POTENTIAL; TRAPPED ATOMS;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 4043133085     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Phys. Scr. T76, 127 (1998).
2. J. Ye et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4987 (1999)
3. D.W. Vernooy, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2000.
4. C. J. Hood et al., Science 287, 1447 (2000)
5. C. J. Hood et al., Phys. Rev. A 63, 013401 (2001).
6. P.W.H. Pinkse et al., Nature (London) 404, 365 (2000).
7. G. R. Guthöhrlein et al., Nature (London) 414, 49 (2001).
8. J. Eschner et al., Nature (London) 413, 495 (2001).
9. T. Pellizari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995).
10. J. I. Cirac et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
11. S. van Enk et al., Science 279, 205 (1998).
12. C. Cabrillo et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 1025 (1999).
13. S. Bose et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5158 (1999).
14. A.S. Parkins and H. J. Kimble, J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 1, 496 (1999).
15. H. J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten, Laser Cooling and Trappingy (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).
16. C. J. Hood and C. Wood, as described by H. J. Kimble et al., in Laser Spectroscopy XIV, edited by (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), p. 80.
17. H. Katori et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 2479 (1999)
18. T. Ido et al., Phys. Rev. A 61, 061403 (2000).
19. S. J. van Enk et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 013407 (2001).
20. C. J. Hood et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 033804 (2001).
21. H. Mabuchi et al., Opt. Lett. 21, 1393 (1996).
22. + < 0.02 [0.002] for the FORT [probe] beam.
23. 2 for the repumping light, with uncertainties of roughly 2 times.
24. C. J. Hood et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4157 (1998).
25. p = 0 the decreases are similar to those in Refs. [2,18], albeit now in the presence of the FORT.
26. N is estimated from the mean number of atom transit events (of duration ≃ 150 μs) during the interval ≃ 10 ms from the falling MOT atoms, in the absence of trapping.
27. T. A. Savard et al., Phys. Rev. A 56, R1095 (1997)
28. C. W. Gardiner et al., ibid. 61, 045801 (2000).
29. 4 s.
30. K. L. Corwin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1311 (1999).
31. R. A. Cline et al., Opt. Lett. 19, 207 (1994).
32. A. Kuhn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067901 (2002).
33. D. Boiron et al., Phys. Rev. A 53, R3734 (1996), and references therein.