Distributive justice and willingness to pay for municipality child care

Social Justice Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 63-80

  Biel, Anders ^a   Eek, Daniel ^a   Gärling, Tommy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Child care; Distributive justice; Fairness; Social dilemma; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007156326     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-997-0013-4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allison, S. T., and Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. J. Behav. Decision Making 3: 195-204.
2. Biel, A., and Gärling, T. (1995). The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas. J. Environ. Psychol. 15: 221-233.
3. Brewer, M. B., and Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 543-549.
4. Caporael, L. R., Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., and Van de Kragt A. J. (1989). Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behav. Brain Sci. 12: 683-739.
5. d'Anjou, L., Steijn, A., and Van Aarsen, D. (1995). Social position, ideology, and distributive justice. Soc. Justice Res. 8: 351-384.
6. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 31: 169-193.
7. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? J. Soc. Issues 31: 137-149.
8. Hamburger, H., Guyer, M., and Fox, J. (1975). Group size and cooperation. J. Conflict Resolution 19: 503-531.
9. Harris, R. J., and Joyce, M. A. (1980). What's fair? It depends on how you phrase the question. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 165-179.
10. Joireman, J. A., Kuhlman, D. M., and Okuda, H. (1994). Fairness judgments in an asymmetric public goods dilemma. In Shulz, U., Albers, W., and Müller, U. (eds.), Social Dilemmas and Cooperation, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 99-116.
11. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 819-828.
12. Komorita, S. S. (1976). A model of the N-person dilemma-type game. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 12: 357-373.
13. Komorita, S. S., and Lapworth, C. W. (1982). Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42: 487-496.
14. Komorita, S. S., and Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 46: 183-207.
15. Kramer, R. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 1044-1057.
16. Kuhlman, D., and Marshello, A. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32: 922-931.
17. Lamm, H., and Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice: Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Soc. Psychol. Quart. 43: 425-429.
18. Lamm, H., and Schwinger, T. (1983). Need consideration in allocation decisions: Is it just? J. Soc. Psychol. 119: 205-209.
19. Martin, J., and Harder, J. W. (1994). Bread and roses: Justice and the distribution of financial and socioemotional rewards in organizations. Soc. Justice Res. 7: 241-264.
20. Marwell, G., and Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on provision of public goods. I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. Am. J. Sociol. 84: 1335-1360.
21. Meeker, B. F., and Elliott, G. C. (1995). Equality and differentiation: Effects of group structure and allocations. Soc. Justice Res. 8: 263-284.
22. Messick, D. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In Wheeler, L., and Shave, P. (eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 11-44.
23. Messick, D. M., and Schell, T. (1992). Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making. Acta Psychol. 80: 311-323.
24. Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., and Ordóñez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 629-639.
25. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Oppewal, H., and Tougareva, E. (1992). A three-person ultimatum game to investigate effects of differences in need, sharing rules and observability on bargaining behavior. J. Econ. Psychol. 13: 203-213.
27. Orbell, J. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C., and Dawes, R. M. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 811-819.
28. Rapoport, A. (1988). Provision of step-level goods: Effects of inequality in resources. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 432-440.
29. Rapoport, A., Budescu, D. V., Suleiman, R., and Weg, E. (1992). Social dilemmas with uniformly distributed resources. In Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
30. Rapoport, A., and Suleiman, R. (1993). Incremental contribution in step-level public goods games with asymmetric players. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Process. 55: 171-194.
31. Robinson, R. V., and Bell, W. (1978). Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 125-143.
32. Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., and Messick, D. (1987). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 23: 208-216.
33. Samuelson, C. S., Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M., and Rutte, C. G. (1986). Individual restraint and structural change as a solution to social dilemmas. In Wilke, H., Messick, D., and Rutte, C. (eds.), Experimental Social Dilemmas, Verlag Peter Lang, New York, pp. 29-53.
34. Schwinger, T., and Lamm, H. (1981). Justice norms in allocation decisions: Need consideration as a function of resource adequacy for complete need satisfaction, recipients' contributions, and recipients' interpersonal attraction. Soc. Behav. Pers. 9: 235-241.
35. Shepelak, N. J., and Alwin, D. F. (1986). Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 30-46.
36. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S., and Austin, W. G. (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed., Nelson-Hall, Chicago, pp. 7-24.
37. Tyler, T., and Dawes, R. M. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In Mellers, B. A., and Baron, J. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 87-108.
38. Tornblom, K. Y., and Foa, U. G. (1983). Choice of distribution principle: Crosscultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociol. 26: 161-173.
39. Van Dijk, E., and Grodzka, M. (1992). The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step good. J. Econ. Psychol. 13: 329-342.
40. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1993). Differential interests, equity, and public good provision J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29: 1-16.
41. Van Lange, P. A. M., and Liebrand, W. B. G. (1989). On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma. Eur. J. Pers. 3: 209-225.
42. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In Liebrand, W., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K. pp. 3-28.
43. Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. In Stroebe, W., and Hewston, M. (eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Wiley, New York, pp. 165-187.
44. Wilke, H. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Lotgerink, B., and Buurma, B. (1986). Equity and individual preferences in a MDG. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 16: 131-148.
45. Wit A., Wilke, H. A. M., and Oppewal, H. (1992). Fairness in asymmetric social dilemmas. In Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.