Annelids step forward

Evolution and Development

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 141-142

  Chipman, Ariel D ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANNELID WORM; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; NOTE; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; ANNELIDA; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

ANNELIDA;

EID: 40349114365     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00221.x     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Bleidorn, C. 2007. The role of character loss in phylogenetic reconstruction as exemplified for the Annelida. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 45 : 299 307.
2. Boore, J. L. Staton, J. L. 2002. The mitochondrial genome of the sipunculid Phascolopsis gouldii supports its association with Annelida rather than Mollusca. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 : 127 137.
3. Fischer, A. Dorresteijn, A. 2004. The polychaete Platynereis dumerilii (Annelida): a laboratory animal with spiralian cleavage, lifelong segment proliferation and a mixed benthic/pelagic life cycle. Bioessays 26 : 314 325.
4. Halanych, K. M., Dahlgren, T. G. McHugh, D. (2002). Unsegmented annelids? Possible origins of four lophotrochozoan worm taxa. Int. Comp. Biol. 42 : 678 684.
5. Hessling, R. Westheide, W. 2002. Are Echiura derived from a segmented ancestor? Immunohistochemical analysis of the nervous system in developmental stages of Bonellia viridis. J. Morphol. 252 : 100 113.
6. Hoeg, J. T. Lutzen, J. 1995. Life cycle and reproduction in the Cirripedia Rhizocephala. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 33 : 427 485.
7. Jenner, R. A. 2004. When molecules and morphology clash: reconciling conflicting phylogenies of the Metazoa by considering secondary character loss. Evol. Dev. 6 : 372 378.
8. Jenner, R. A. 2006. Unburdening evo-devo: ancestral attractions, model organisms, and basal baloney. Dev. Gen. Evol. 216 : 385 394.
9. McHugh, D. (1997). Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 8006 8009.
10. Porter, M. L. Crandall, K. A. 2003. Lost along the way: the significance of evolution in reverse. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 541 547.
11. Prud'homme, B., et al. 2003. Arthropod-like expression patterns of engrailed and wingless in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggest a role in segment formation. Curr. Biol. 13 : 1876 1881.
12. Seaver, E. C. Kaneshige, L. M. 2006. Expression of 'segmentation' genes during larval and juvenile development in the polychaetes Capitella sp I and H-elegans. Dev. Biol. 289 : 179 194.
13. Seaver, E. C., Thamm, K. Hill, S. D. 2005. Growth patterns during segmentation in the two polychaete annelids, Capitella sp I and Hydroides elegans: comparisons at distinct life history stages. Evol. Dev. 7 : 312 326.
14. Shimizu, T., Kitamura, K., Arai, A. Nakamoto, A. 2001. Pattern formation in embryos of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: cellular basis for segmentation and specification of segmental identity. Hydrobiologia 463 : 123 131.
15. Struck, T. H., et al. 2007. Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evol. Biol. 7 : 57.
16. Tessmar-Raible, K. Arendt, D. 2003. Emerging systems: between vertebrates and arthropods, the Lophotrochozoa. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 13 : 331 340.
17. Weisblat, D. A., Gonsalves, F. C., Huang, F. Z., Kang, D. M. Song, M. H. 2004. Evolutionary speculations regarding spiral cleavage and segmentation, based on studies of glossiphoniid leech embryos. Cladistics 20 : 98 99.