The identity intrusion effect: Attentional capture or perceptual load?

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 182-199

  Gibson, Bradley ^a   Bryant, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTUITION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 40349091697     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701467987     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ansorge, U. and Heumann, M. (2003) Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 937-948.
2. Bacon, W. and Egeth, H. (1994) Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, pp. 485-496.
3. Burnham, B. R. (2007) Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, pp. 392-422.
4. Burnham, B. R., Neely, J. H., Walker, P. B. and Neill, W. T. (2006) Interference from irrelevant colour-singletons during serial search depends on visual attention being spatially diffuse. Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 75-78.
5. Cave, K. R. and Wolfe, J. M. (1990) Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, pp. 225-271.
6. Egeth, H. and Yantis, S. (1997) Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, pp. 269-297.
7. Eltiti, S., Wallace, D. and Fox, E. (2005) Selective target processing: Perceptual load or distractor salience?. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, pp. 876-885.
8. Folk, C. and Annett, S. (1994) Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention?. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, pp. 277-287.
9. Folk, C. and Remington, R. (1998) Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 847-858.
10. Folk, C., Remington, R. and Johnston, J. (1992) Involuntary cover orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, pp. 1030-1044.
11. Gibson, B. S. and Jiang, Y. (1998) Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search. Psychological Science, 9, pp. 176-182.
12. Gibson, B. S. and Kelsey, E. (1998) Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 699-706.
13. Huang-Pollack, C. L., Nigg, J. T. and Carr, T. H. (2005) Deficient attention is hard to find: Applying the perceptual load of selective attention to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, pp. 1211-1218.
14. Johnson, D. N., McGrath, A. and McNeil, C. (2002) Cuing interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychological Science, 13, pp. 284-287.
15. Jonides, J. and Yantis, S. (1988) Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, pp. 346-354.
16. Lamy, D. and Egeth, H. (2003) Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 1003-1020.
17. Lavie, N. (1995) Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 451-468.
18. Lavie, N. (2000) Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive performance, pp. 175-194. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
19. Lavie, N. (2005) Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, pp. 75-82.
20. Lavie, N. and Cox, S. (1997) On the efficiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction. Psychological Science, 8, pp. 395-398.
21. Lavie, N. and Fox, E. (2000) The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, pp. 1038-1052.
22. Lavie, N. and Tsal, Y. (1994) Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, pp. 183-197.
23. Leber, A. and Egeth, H. (2006) It's under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, pp. 132-134.
24. Leber, A. and Egeth, H. (2006) Attention on auto-pilot: Past experience and attentional set. Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 565-583.
25. Ratcliff, R. (1979) Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, pp. 446-461.
26. Rauschenberger, R. (2003) Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, pp. 814-842.
27. Ruz, M. and Lupianez, J. (2002) A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicologica International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 23, pp. 283-309.
28. Simons, D. J. (2000) Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, pp. 147-155.
29. Theeuwes, J. (1991) Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, pp. 184-193.
30. Theeuwes, J. (1992) Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, pp. 599-606.
31. Theeuwes, J. (1994) Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp. 799-806.
32. Theeuwes, J. (1996) Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. Converging operations in the study of visual attention, pp. 297-314. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
33. Theeuwes, J. (2004) Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 65-70.
34. Theeuwes, J. and Burger, R. (1998) Attentional control duringvisual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 1342-1353.
35. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F. and Belopolsky, A. V. (2004) Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 697-702.
36. Todd, S. and Kramer, A. F. (1994) Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, pp. 198-210.
37. Wolfe, J. M. (1994) Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, pp. 202-238.
38. (2000) Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive performance, pp. 73-104. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA