Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set

Visual Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 4-8, 2006, Pages 565-583

  Leber, Andrew B ^a,b   Egeth, Howard E ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 33745817856     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280500193438     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bacon, W. F. and Egeth, H. E. (1994) Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture Perception and Psychophysics, 55, pp. 485-496.
2. Chun, M. M. (2000) Contextual cueing of visual attention Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 170-178.
3. Chun, M. M. and Jiang, Y. (1998) Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention Cognitive Psychology, 36, pp. 28-71.
4. Feintuch, U. and Cohen, A. (2002) Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions Psychological Science, 13(4), pp. 361-369.
5. Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E.(2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception and Psychophysics.
6. Folk, C. L. and Remington, R. W. (1998) Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 847-858.
7. Folk, C. L. and Remington, R. W. and Johnston, J. C. (1992) Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, pp. 1030-1044.
8. Found, A. and Müller, H. J. (1996) Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension weighting" account Perception and Psychophysics, 58, pp. 88-101.
9. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000) Repetition effects in visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 800-817.
10. Jonides, J. and Yantis, S. (1988) Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention Perception and Psychophysics, 43, pp. 346-354.
11. Krummenacher, J. and Müller, H. J. and Heller, D. (2003) Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), pp. 1303-1322.
12. Kumada, T. (2001) Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting Perception & Psychophysics, 63, pp. 698-708.
13. Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2001, November). Attentional control, task switching, and a new definition for the residual switch cost. Poster presented at the annual Object Perception and Memory (OPAM) workshop, Orlando, FL.
14. Luchins, A. S. (1942) Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung Psychological Monographs, 54, pp. 248.
15. Luchins, A. S. and Luchins, E. H. (1950) New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving Journal of General Psychology, 42, pp. 279-297.
16. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (1994) Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features Memory and Cognition, 22, pp. 657-672.
17. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (2000) Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection Visual Cognition, 7(5), pp. 571-595.
18. Müller, H. J. and Heller, D. and Ziegler, J. (1995) Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions Perception and Psychophysics, 57, pp. 1-17.
19. Müller, H. J. and Krummenacher, J. (2006) Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 490-513.
20. Norman, D. A. (1981) Categorisation of action slips Psychological Review, 88(1), pp. 1-15.
21. Norman, D. A. and Shallice, T.(1986) Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In Advances in research: Vol. IV. Consciousness and self-regulation. (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.
22. Olivers, C. N. L. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 650-657.
23. Pashler, H. (1988) Cross-dimensional interaction and texture and texture segregation Perception and Psychophysics, 43, pp. 307-318.
24. Pollmann, S. and Weidner, R. and Müller, H. J. and von Cramon, D.Y. (2006) Neural correlates of visual dimension weighting Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 877-897.
25. Reason, J. T.(1979) Actions not as planned: The price of automatization. In Aspects of consciousness. London: Academic Press.
26. Reason, J. T.(1984) Lapses of attention in everyday life. In Varieties of attention. Orlando FL: Academic Press.
27. Theeuwes, J. (1990) Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search Acta Psychologia, 74, pp. 81-99.
28. Theeuwes, J. (1991) Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity Perception and Psychophysics, 50, pp. 184-193.
29. Theeuwes, J. (1992) Perceptual selectivity for color and form Perception and Psychophysics, 51, pp. 599-606.
30. Theeuwes, J. and Reimann, B. and Mortier, K. (2006) Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 466-489.
31. Todd, S. and Kramer, A. F. (1994) Attentional misguidance in visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 56(2), pp. 198-210.
32. Turatto, M. and Galfano, G. (2001) Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set Perception and Psychophysics, 63, pp. 286-297.
33. Wolfe, J. M. and Butcher, S. J. and Lee, C. and Hyle, M. (2003) Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 493-502.
34. Wolfe, J. M. and Horowitz, T. S. (2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, pp. 1-7.
35. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H.(1960). Experimental psychology (Rev. ed.). New York: Henry Holt.
36. Yantis, S. and Egeth, H. E. (1999) On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, pp. 661-676.