The relationship between teacher immediacy behaviours and distant learners' social presence perceptions in videoconferencing applications

Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 180-192

  Bozkaya, Mujgan ^a  

^a ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Social presence; Teacher immediacy behaviour; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 40249103787     PISSN: 13026488     EISSN: 13026488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andersen, J., Andersen, P., & Jensen, A (1979). The measurement of nonverbal Immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication, 7, 153-180.
2. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. New Jersey: Transaction Books.
3. Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). "Eye contact, distance and affiliation". Soclometry, 28, 289-304.
4. Booth- Butterfield, S., Mosher, N., & Mollish, D. (1992). Teacher Immediacy and student involment: Adual process analysis. Communication Research reports, 13-22.
5. Burgeon, J., Buller, D., & Woodall, W. (1996). Nonverbal Communication: The unspoken Dialogue (2.nd): McGraw-Hill.
6. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
7. Daft, R. L.,& Lengel, R. H. ( 1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behaviour and organizational design. Research in organizational Behaviour, 6, 191-233.
8. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application, Sage Publications, California.
9. George, D., & Mallery, P. (1995). SPSS: Step by step. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
10. Griffiths, D., Stirling, D. W., & Weldon, L. K. (1998). Understanding Data: Principles & practice of statistics. Queensland: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education. 37, 40-53.
12. Hackman, M & Walker, K. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: the effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education. 39 (3), 196-206.
13. Kydd, C.T. & Ferry, D.L. (1994). Managerial use of videoconferencing. Information & Management, 27 (6), 369-375.
14. McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1996).Distance Education. In Jonassen, D (ed.) Handbook for research on educational communications and technology, Scholastic Press, New York, pp.403-437.
15. Mehribian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from non-immediacy of verbal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 294-295.
16. Murphy, K. L., & Farr, C.W.(1993). The critical role of the ID in interactive television: The value of immediacy. In proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the convention of the AECT sponsored by the Research and Theory Division, New Orleans, LA, January 13-17.
17. Netemeyer, R. G, Bearden, W. O and Sharma, S. (2003): Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
18. Newliep, J. (1997). Communication Research a cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese College classrooms. Communication Education, 24(4), 431.
19. Richmond,V.P., Gorham, J.S., & McCroskey, J.C.(1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviours and cognitive learning. In M. McLauhhlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 574-590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. E. (2003). Development of the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515.
21. Rifkind, L. J. (1992). Immediacy is a predictor of teacher effectiveness in the instructional television classroom. Journal of Interactive Television, 1(1), 31-38.
22. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L.(1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective and behavirol learning in the multiculturel classroom. Communications Educations, 39, 341-353.
23. Short, J., Willliams, B., & Christie, B (1976). The Social Psycholgy of elecommunications. London: Wiley.
24. Siktin, S., Sutcliffe, K., & Barrios- Choplin, J. (1992). A Dual- Capacity Model of communication Media Choice in Organizations. Human Communication Research, 18 (4), 563-598.
25. Thweatt, K. S., McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Teacher nonimmediacy and misbehavior: Unintentional negative communication. Communication Reseach Reports, 13 (2), 198-204.
26. Titsworth, B. S. (2001). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students' affective learning. Communication Studies, 52, 169-179.
27. Trevino, L., Lengel, R. & Daft, R. ( 1987). Media Symbolizm, Media Richness, and media Choice in Organization. Communications Research, 14( 5), 553-574.
28. Walter, J.B. & Burgoon, J.K. ( 1992). Relational Communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research, 19 (1), 50-88.