Between control and drift: Negotiating improvement in a small software firm

Information Technology and People

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 69-90

  Tjornehoj, Gitte ^a   Mathiassen, Lars ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer software; Control systems; Denmark; Technology led strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 40249094643     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593840810860333     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Aaen, I., Arendt, J., Mathiassen, L. and Ngwenyama, O. (2001), "A conceptual map of software process improvement", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 81-101.
2. Ares, J., García, R., Juristo, N., López, M. and Moreno, A.M. (2000), "A more rigorous and comprehensive approach to software process assessment", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 5, pp. 3-30.
3. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
4. Balla, K., Bemelmans, T., Kusters, R. and Trienekens, J. (2001), "Quality through managed improvement and measurement (QMIM): towards a phased development and implementation of a quality management system for a software company", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 177-93.
5. Batista, J. and Figueiredo, A.D.D. (2000), "SPI in a very small team: a case with CMM", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 5, pp. 243-50.
6. Bennetts, P.D.C. and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1998), "The soft system methodology as a framework for software process improvement", Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 10, pp. 12-19.
7. Bjerknes, G. (1991), "Dialectical reflection in information systems development", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 55-77.
8. Brigham, M. and Introna, L.D. (2006), "Hospitality, improvisation and Gestell: a phenomenology of mobile information", Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 21, pp. 140-53.
9. Brodman, J.G. and Johnson, D.L. (1994), "What small businesses and small organizations say about the CMM", paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Sorrento.
10. Brouse, P.S. and Buys, R.T. (1999), "Affordable ways to improve application development", IT Professional, Vol. 1, pp. 47-52.
11. Börjesson, A. and Mathiassen, L. (2003), "Making SPI happen: the IDEAL distribution of effort", paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, Hawaii.
12. Börjesson, A. and Mathiassen, L. (2005), "Improving software organizations: the agility challenge", Information, Technology & People, Vol. 18, pp. 359-82.
13. Callon, M. (1986), "Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay", in Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
14. Callon, M. and Law, J. (1989), "On the construction of socio technical networks: content and context revisited", Knowledge and Society, Vol. 9, pp. 57-83.
15. Casey, V. and Richardson, I. (2004), "A practical application of the IDEAL model", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 9, pp. 123-32.
16. Cho, S., Mathiassen, L. and Nilsson, A. (2006), Event-Based Actor Network Analysis of IT-Based Change, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
17. Ciborra, C.U. (1994a), "From thinking to tinkering", in Ciborra, C.U. and Jellasi, T. (Eds), Strategic Information Systems, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
18. Ciborra, C.U. (1994b), "A platform for surprises: the organization of global technology strategy at Olivetti", IFIP WG8.2 Working Conference on Information Technology and New Emergent Forms of Organizations: Transforming Organizations with Information Technology, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdan.
19. Ciborra, C. (1999), "Notes on improvisations and time in organizations", Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, pp. 77-94.
20. Ciborra, C. (2002), The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
21. Ciborra, C. and Hanseth, O. (1998), "From tool to Gestell - agendas for managing the information infrastructure", Information Technology & People, Vol. 305 -327.
22. Ciborra, C. and Lanzara, G.F. (1994), "Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations", Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 4, pp. 61-8.
23. Ciborra, C.U., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Failla, A. and Hanseth, O. (2000), From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Coleman, G. and Verbruggen, R. (1998), "A quality software process for rapid application development", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 107-22.
25. Dion, R. (1992), "Elements of a process-improvement program", IEEE Software, Vol. 9, pp. 83-5.
26. Dyb, T. (2003), "Factors of software process improvement success in small and large organizations: an empirical study in the Scandinavian context", ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 28, pp. 148-57.
27. El-Emam, K., Goldenson, D., McCurley, J. and Herbsleb, J. (2001), "Modeling the likelihood of software process improvement: an exploratory study", Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 6, pp. 207-29.
28. Elbanna, A.R. (2006), "The validity of the improvisation argument in the implementation of rigid technology: the case of ERP systems", Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 21, pp. 165-75.
29. Grechenig, T. and Zuser, W. (2004), "Creating organic software maturity attitudes (COSMA) selected principles and activities for software maturity in small and medium software enterprises", paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'04). Braunschweig.
30. Hansen, B., Rose, J. and Tjørnehøj, G. (2004), "Prescription, description, reflection: the shape of the software process improvement field", in Powell, P. and Grant, K. (Eds), UK Association of Information Systems Conference, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow.
31. Hanseth, O., Ciborra, C. and Braa, K. (2001), "The control devolution: ERP and the side effects of globalization", SIGMIS Database, Vol. 32, pp. 34-46.
32. Harjumaa, L., Tervonen, I. and Vuorio, P. (2004), "Using software inspection as a catalyst for SPI in a small company", Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
33. Horvat, R.V., Rozman, I. and Györkös, J. (2000), "Managing the complexity of SPI in small companies", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 5, pp. 45-54.
34. Humphrey, W.S., Snyder, T.R. and Willis, R.R. (1991), "Software process improvement at Hughes Aircraft", IEEE Software, Vol. 8, pp. 11-23.
35. Jakobsen, A.B. (1998), "Bottom-up process improvement tricks", IEEE Software, Vol. 15, pp. 64-8.
36. Kautz, K. (1998), "Software process improvement in very small enterprises: does it pay off?", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 209-26.
37. Kautz, K.H. (1999), "Making sense of measurement for small organizations", IEEE Software, Vol. 16, pp. 14-20.
38. Kautz, K.H., Hansen, H.W. and Thaysen, K. (2000), "Applying and adjusting a software process improvement model in practice: the use of the IDEAL model in a small software enterprise", 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, ACM Press, Limerick.
39. Kehoe, R. and Shah-Jarvis, A. (1995), ISO 9000-3: A Tool for Software Product and Process Improvement, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
40. Kelly, D.P. and Culleton, B. (1999), "Process improvement for small organizations", Computer, Vol. 32, pp. 41-7.
41. Kilpi, T. (1998), "Product management challenge to software change process: preliminary results from three SMEs experiment", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 3, pp. 165-75.
42. Kuvaja, P., Palo, J. and Bicego, A. (1999), "TAPISTRY - a software process improvement approach tailored for small enterprises", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 149-56.
43. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. Law, J. (1991), "Introduction: monsters, machines, and socio technical relations", in Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays of Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
45. Leung, H.K.N. and Yuen, T.C.F. (2001), "A process framework for small projects", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 6, pp. 67-83.
46. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962), La pensée sauvage, Librairie Plon, Paris.
47. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1972), The Savage Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
48. McFeeley, B. (1996), IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
49. McKay, J. and Marshall, P. (2001), "The dual imperatives of action research", Information Technology & People, Vol. 14, pp. 46-59.
50. Mathiassen, L. (1998), "Reflective systems development", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 10, pp. 67-118.
51. Mathiassen, L. (2002), "Collaborative practice research. information", Technology & People, Vol. 15, pp. 321-45.
52. Mathiassen, L., Borum, F. and Pedersen, J.S. (1999), "Developing managerial skills in IT organizations: a case study based on action learning", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 8, pp. 209-25.
53. Mathiassen, L., Pries-Heje, J. and Ngwenyama, O. (Eds) (2002), Improving Software Organizations: From Principles to Practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
54. Mustonen-Ollila, E. and Lyytinen, K. (2003), "Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using diffusion of innovation theory", Information Systems Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 275-97.
55. Newman, M. and Robey, D. (1992), "A social process model of user-analyst relationship", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp. 249-66.
56. Ngwenyama, O. and Nielsen, P.A. (2003), "Competing values in software process improvement: an assumption analysis of CMM from an organizational culture perspective", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50, pp. 100-12.
57. Nielsen, P. and Tjørnehøj, G. (2005), "Mapping social networks in software process improvement: an action research study", Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion, Springer, Boston, MA.
58. Paulk, M.C. (1998), "Using the software CMM in small organizations", The Joint Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference and the Eighth International Conference on Software Quality, pp. 350-61.
59. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. and Weber, C. (1993), Capability Maturity Model for Software Version 1.1, Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
60. Peterson, M.F. (1998), "Embedded organizational events: units of process in organization science", Organization Science, Vol. 9, pp. 16-33.
61. Pettigrew, A.M. (1990), "Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice", Organization Science, Vol. 1, pp. 267-92.
62. Richardson, I. (2001), "Software process matrix: a small company SPI model", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 6, pp. 157-65.
63. Richardson, I. (2002), "SPI models: what characteristics are required for small software development companies?", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 101-14.
64. Robey, D. and Boudreau, M.-C. (1999), "Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: theoretical directions and methodological implications", Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, pp. 167-85.
65. Rodenbach, E., Van Latum, F. and Van Solingen, R. (2000), "SPI - a guarantee for success? A reality story from industry", Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Springer, Berlin.
66. Ruiz, M., Ramos, I. and Toro, M. (2002), "A dynamic integrated framework for software process improvement", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 181-94.
67. Saccol, A.Z. and Reinhard, N. (2006), "The hospitality metaphor as a theoretical lens for understanding the ICT adoption process", Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 21, pp. 154-64.
68. Schneider, K. (2002), Experience Based Process Improvement. Software Quality - ECSQ 2002: 7th International Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 9-13 June 2002, Proceedings, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
69. Scott, L., Carvalho, L., Jeffery, R., D'ambra, J. and Becker-Komstaedt, U. (2002), "Understanding the use of an electronic process guide", Information and Software Technology, Vol. 44, pp. 601-16.
70. Scott, L., Jeffery, R., Carvalho, L., D'ambra, J. and Rutherford, P. (2001), "Practical software process improvement - the IMPACT project", paper presented at the 13th Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'01).
71. Steel, A.P.C. (2004), "Low-rigour, rapid software process assessments for small software development firms", paper presented at the 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'04).
72. Susman, G.I. and Evered, R.D. (1978), "An assessment of the scientific merits of action research", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, p. 582.
73. Saastamoinen, I. and Tukiainen, M. (2004), Springer-Verlag, Trondheim, "Software process improvement in small and medium sized software enterprises in Eastern Finland: a state-of-the-practice study", paper presented at Software Process Improvement: 11th European Conference, EuroSPI.
74. Team, C.P. (2002), CMMISM for Systems Engineering/Software Engineering/Integrated Product and Process Development/Supplier Sourcing, Version 1.1, Staged Representation (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1, Staged), Technical Report SEI.
75. Team, C.P.D. (2000), SCAMPISM, V1.0 Standard CMMISM Assessment Method for Process Improvement: Method Description, Version 1.0, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
76. Thowart, K. (1999), "The AMETIST process improvement experiment: towards efficient team development in small companies", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 11-18.
77. Truffley, A., Grove, B. and McNair, G. (2004), "SPICE for Small Organizations", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 9, pp. 23-31.
78. Van de Ven, A.H. and Poole, M.S. (1995), "Explaining development and change in organizations", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 510-40.
79. Varkoi, T., Makinen, T. and Jaakkola, H. (1999), "Process improvement priorities in small software companies", paper presented at Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Technology and Innovation Management, PICMET '99 Portland, OR.
80. Villalon, J., Agustin, G.C., Gilabert, T.S.F., Seco, A.D., Sanchez, L.G. and Cota, M.P. (2002), "Experiences in the application of software process improvement in SMES", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 261-73.
81. Walsham, G. (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Wiley, Chichester.
82. Walsham, G. (1995), "Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 74-81.
83. Walsham, G. (1997), "Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects", in Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J. and Degross, J.I. (Eds), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman and Hall, London.
84. Ward, R.P., Fayad, M.E. and Laitinen, M. (2001), "Software process improvement in the small - a small software development company's most difficult challenge: changing processes to match changing circumstances", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 44, pp. 105-7.
85. Wilkie, F.G., McFall, D. and McCaffery, F. (2005), "An evaluation of CMMI process areas for small- to medium-sized software development organizations", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 10, pp. 189-201.
86. Wohlwend, H. and Rosenbaum, S. (1994), "Schlumberger's Software Improvement Program", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 20, pp. 833-9.
87. Yin, R. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Method, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.