Multiclass SVM model selection using particle swarm optimization

Proceedings - Sixth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems and Fourth Conference on Neuro-Computing and Evolving Intelligence, HIS-NCEI 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  De Souza, Bruno Feres ^a   De Carvalho, André C P L F ^a   Calvo, Rodrigo ^a   Ishii, Renato Porfírio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO); PROBLEM SOLVING;

BENCHMARK PROBLEMS; BINARY MODELS; DECOMPOSITION SCHEMES;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 40249093352     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HIS.2006.264914     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. O. Chapelle, V. Vapnik, O. Bousquet, and S. Mukherjee. Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines. Mach. Learn., 46(1-3): 131-159, 2002.
2. M. Clerc. The swarm and the queen: Towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of IEEE CEC 1999), pages 1951-1957, Piscataway, New Jersey, 1999. IEEE Press.
3. G. Cohen, M. Hilario, and A. Geissbühler. Model selection for support vector classifiers via genetic algorithms. an application to medical decision support. In Proc. ISB-MDA 2004, LNCS, pages 200-211, Valencia, Spain, 2004. Springer-Verlag.
4. K. Duan, S. S. Keerthi, and A. N. Poo. Evaluation of simple performance measures for tuning svm hyperparameters. Neurocomp., 51:41-59, 2003.
5. A. Feelders and W. Verkooijen. On the statistical comparison of inductive learning methods. In Learning from data Artificial Intelligence and Statistics V, pages 271-279. Spring-Verlag, 1996.
6. F. Friedrichs and C. Igel. Evolutionary tuning of multiple svm parameters. Neurocomp., 64:107-117, 2005.
7. T. Glasmachers and C. Igel. Gradient-based adaptation of general gaussian kernels. Neural Comput., 17(10):2099-2105, 2005.
8. T. Howley and M. G. Madden. The genetic kernel support vector machine: Description and evaluation. Artif. Intell. Rev., 24(3-4):379-395, 2005.
9. C.-W. Hsu and C.-J. Lin. A comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 13:415-425, 2002.
10. F. Imbault and K. Lebart. A stochastic optimization approach for parameter tuning of support vector machines. In Proc. of ICPR 2004, volume 4, pages 597-600. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
11. T. Joachims. Estimating the generalization performance of a SVM efficiently. In P. Langley, editor, Proc. of 17th ICML-00, pages 431-438, Stanford, US, 2000. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, US.
12. Y. Lee, Y. Lin, and G. Wahba. Multicategory support vector machines theory, and application to the classification of microarray data and satellite radiance data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99:67-81, March 2004.
13. K. E. Parsopoulos and M. N. Vrahatis. Recent approaches to global optimization problems through particle swarm optimization. Natural Computing: an international journal, 1(2-3):235-306, 2002.
14. A. Passerini, M. Pontil, and P. Frasconi. New results on error correcting output codes of kernel machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15(1):45-54, January 2004.
15. X. Peng and A. Chan. An efficient algorithm on multi-class support vector machine model selection. In Proc. of IJCNN 2003, volume 4, pages 3229-3232, Portland, Oregon, July 2003. IEEE Press.
16. R. Rifkin and A. Klautau. In defense of one-vs-all classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5:101-141, 2004.
17. T. P. Runarsson and S. Sigurdsson. Asynchronous parallel evolutionary model selection for support vector machines. Neural Information Processing - Letters and Reviews, 3(3):59-67, June 2004.
18. T. Suttorp and C. Igel. Multi-objective Machine Learning, volume 16 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, chapter Multi-objective optimization of support vector machines, pages 199-220. Springer Verlag, 2006.
19. V. N. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1995.