Validity of the TIMPSI for estimating concurrent performance on the test of infant motor performance

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-10

  Campbell, Suzann K ^a   Swanlund, Andrew ^a   Smith, Everett ^a   Liao, Pai Jun ^a   Zawacki, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental disabilities diagnosis; Human movement system; Infant; Motor skills; Motor skills disorders diagnosis; Movement; Neonatal screening; Neurological diagnostic techniques; Newborn infant; Posture; Predictive value of tests

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEWBORN SCREENING; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MASS SCREENING; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK;

EID: 39849088122     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31815f66a6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Osten ET, et al. Construct validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Ther. 1995;75:585-596.
2. Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance. Test User's Manual Version 2. Chicago, IL: Infant Motor Performance Scales, LLC; 2005.
3. Campbell SK, Levy P, Zawacki L, Liao P-j. Population-based age standards for interpreting results on the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18:119-125.
4. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9-, and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:263-272.
5. Kolobe THA, Bulanda M, Susman L. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Ther. 2004;84: 1144-1156.
6. Murney ME, Campbell SK. The ecological relevance of the Test of Infant Motor Performance elicited scale Items. Phys Ther. 1998;78: 479-489.
7. Girolami GL, Campbell SK. The efficacy of a neuro-developmental treatment program for improving motor control in preterm infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1994;6:175-184.
8. Lekskulchai R, Cole J. Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Australian J Physiother. 2001; 47:169-176.
9. Campbell SK, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Development of a functional movement scale for infants. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:191-205.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health, United States, 1998 with Socioeconomic Status and Health Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998. US DHHS Publication Number (PHS) 98-1232.
11. Linacre JM. FACETS: Computer Program for Many-faceted Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1998.
12. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut; 1960. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1980).
13. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press 1982.
14. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best Test Design. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1979.
15. Linacre JM. WINSTEPS: Rasch Measurement Computer Program. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com; 2006.
16. Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149-174.
17. Wolfe EW. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model. In Smith EV Jr, and Smith RM, eds. An Introduction to Rasch Measurement: Theory, Models, and Applications. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press; 2004:366-390.
18. Piper M, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1994.