Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the test of infant motor performance

Physical Therapy

Volumn 84, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1144-1156

  Kolobe, Thubi H A ^a   Bulanda, Michelle ^b   Susman, Louisa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental tests; Home environment; Infants; Motor development; Peabody Developmental Motor Scales; Predictive validity

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOME; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR DEVELOPMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 10044279505     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/84.12.1144     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Meisels SJ, Shonkoff JP. Early childhood intervention: a continuing evolution. In: Meisels SJ, Shonkoff JP, eds. Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge Press; 2000:3-31.
2. Coolman RB, Bennett FC, Sells CJ, et al. Neuromotor development of graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit: patterns encountered in the first two years of life. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1986;6:327-333.
3. Piper MC, Mazer B, Silver KM, Ramsay M. Resolution of neurological symptoms in high-risk infants during the first two years of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988;30:26-35.
4. Wildin SR, Anderson AE, Woodside M, et al. Prediction of 12-month neurodevelopmental outcome from a 6-month neurologic examination in premature infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1995;5:290-299.
5. de Vries AM, Groot L. Transient dystonias revisited: a comparative study of preterm and term children at 21/2 years of age. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:415-421.
6. Leonard CH, Clyman RI, Piecuch RE, et al. Effect of medical and social risk factors on outcome of prematurity and very low birth weight. J Pediatr. 1990;116:620-626.
7. Wildin SR, Smith KE, Anderson AE, et al. Prediction of developmental patterns through 40 months from 6- and 12-month neurologic examinations in very low birth weight infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1997;18:215-221.
8. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
9. Aylward GP, Verhulst SJ. Predictive utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) risk status classifications: clinical interpretation and application. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:25-31.
10. Darrah J, Piper MC, Watt MJ. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:485-491.
11. Magaziner V, Molteno C, Lachman P, et al. A neuromotor screening test for high risk infants in a hospital or community setting. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 1997;9:66-72.
12. Morgan AM, Aldag JC. Early identification of cerebral palsy using a profile of abnormal motor patterns. Pediatrics. 1996;98:692-697.
13. Allen MC, Alexander GR. Using motor milestones as a multistep process to screen preterm infants for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:12-16.
14. Touwen BCL, Lok-Meijer TY, Huisjes HJ, Olinga AA. The recovery rate of neurologically deviant newborns. Early Hum Dev. 1982;7:131-148.
15. Darrah J, Hodge M, Magill-Evans J, Kembhavi G, Stability of serial assessment of motor and communication abilities in typically developing infants: implications for screening. Early Hum Dev. 2003;72:97-110.
16. Erickson C, Allert C, Carlberg EB, et al. Stability of longitudinal motor development in very low birthweight infants from 5 months to 5.5 years. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:197-203.
17. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9-, and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:263-272.
18. Bradley RH. Children's home environments, health, behavior, and intervention efforts: a review using the HOME inventory as a marker measure. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1993;19:437-490.
19. Levy-Shiff R, Einat G, Mogilner MB, et al. Biological and environmental correlates of developmental outcome of prematurely born infants in early adolescence. J Pediatr Psychol. 1994;19:63-78.
20. Helms JE. Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? Am Psychol. 1992;47:1083-1101.
21. Zahr LK. Predictors of development in premature infants from low-income families: African Americans and Hispanics. J Perinatol. 1999;19:284-289.
22. Garret P, Ferron J, Ngandu N, et al. A structural model for the developmental status of young children. J Marriage Fam. 1994;56:147-163.
23. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Osten ET, et al. Evidence for the construct validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Ther. 1995;75:585-596.
24. Dubowitz L, Dubowitz V. The Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Full-Term Newborn Infant. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1981.
25. Brazelton TB. Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1984. Clinics in Developmental Medicine.
26. Amiel-Tison C, Grenier A. Neurologic Assessment During the First Year of Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.
27. Cioni G, Prechtl HFR. Preterm and early postterm motor behavior in low risk premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 1990;23:159-191.
28. Campbell SK, Hedeker D. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. J Pediatr. 2001;139:546-551.
29. Davidson EC, Hobel CJ. POPRAS: A Guide to Using the Prenatal, Intrapartum, Postpartum Record. Torrance, Calif: South Bay Regional Perinatal Project Professional Staff Association; 1978.
30. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA. Concurrent Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2000;12:2-9.
31. Campbell SK. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 1999;11:60-66.
32. Linacre JM. FACETS: Computer Program for Many-Faceted Rasch Measurement. Chicago, Ill: Mesa Press; 1988.
33. Flegel J, Kolobe THA. Predictive Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency at school age. Phys Ther. 2002;82:762-771.
34. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. 2nd ed. Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed Inc; 2000.
35. Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment. Arkansas: Ark: Center for Research on Teaching and Learning at the University of Arkansas; 1984.
36. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards Manual. Allen, Tex: DLM Teaching Resources; 1983.
37. Kolobe TH, Palisano RJ, Stratford PW. Comparison of two outcome measures for infants with cerebral palsy and infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1998;78:1062-1072.
38. Palisano RJ, Kolobe TH, Haley SM, et al. Validity of the Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75:939-948.
39. Bradley RH, Mundfrom DJ, Whiteside L, et al. A factor analytic study of the infant toddler and early childhood versions of the HOME inventory administered to white, black, and Hispanic American parents of children born preterm. Child Dev. 1994;65:880-888.
40. Wright BD, Linacre GN. BIGSTEPS: A Rasch-Model Computer Program. Chicago, Ill: MESA Press; 2000.
41. Wright BD, Linacre JM. A User's Guide to BIGSTEPS. Chicago, Ill: MESA Press; 1996.
42. Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance: Test User's Manual Version 1.4. Chicago, Ill: Infant Motor Performance Scales; 2001.
43. Daniel WW, Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1999.
44. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. 1997: 37-157. Available at: www.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/idea/idea.pdf.
45. Pinto-Martin JA, Whitaker AH, Feldman JF, et al. Relation of cranial ultrasound abnormalities in low-birthweight infants to cognitive performance at ages 2, 6, and 9 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41:826-833.
46. Stevenson DK, Wright LL, Lemons JA, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1993 through December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 pt 1):1632-1639.
47. Paul VK, Radhika S, Deorari AK, Singh M. Neurodevelopmental outcome of "at risk" nursery graduates. Indian J Pediatr. 1998;65:857-862.
48. Paneth N. The causes of cerebral palsy. Clinical Investigative Medicine. 1993;16:95-102.
49. Chandler LS, Andrews MS, Swanson MW. Movement Assessment of Infants: A Manual. Washington: DC: Rolling Bay; 1980.
50. Prechd HF. General movement assessment as a method of developmental neurology: new paradigms and their consequences. The 1999 Ronnie McKeith Lecture. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:836-842.
51. Cioni G, Prechtl HFR, Ferrari F, et al. Which better predicts later outcome in fullterm infants: quality of general movements or neurological examination? Early Hum Dev. 1997;50-71-85.
52. Cioni G, Ferrari F, Einspieler C, et al. Comparison between observation of spontaneous movements and neurologic examination in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1997;130:704-711.
53. Prechtl HFR. Scale of the art of a new functional assessment of the young nervous system: an early predictor of cerebral palsy. Early Hum Dev. 1997;50:1-11.
54. Goyen TA, Lui K. Longitudinal motor development of "apparently normal" high-risk infants at 18 months, 3 and 5 years. Early Hum Dev. 2002;70:103-115.
55. Hadders-Algra M. Two distinct forms of minor neurological dysfunction: perspectives emerging from a review of data of the Groningen Perinatal Project. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:561-571.
56. Dewyer CA. Cut scores and testing: statistics, judgment, truth, and error. Psychol Assess. 1996;8:360-362.
57. Glascoe FP. Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:54-59.