Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 41, Issue , 2004, Pages 54-63

  Tang, Rong ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247372211     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450410107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050.
2. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (1999). UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
3. Bracken, J. K., & Tucker, J. M. (1989). Characteristics of the journal literature of bibliographic instruction. College and Research Libraries, 50, 665-673.
4. Brillouin, L. (1956). Science and information theory. New York: Academic Press.
5. Broadus, R. N. (1971). The literature of the social sciences: A survey of citation studies. International Social Science Journal, 23, 236-243.
6. Brook, B. C. (1980). The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2, 125-133.
7. Buttlar, J. (1999). Information sources in Library and Information Science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 227-245.
8. Choi, J. M. (1988). Citation analysis of intra- and interdisciplinary communication patterns in anthropology in the USA. Behavioral and Social Science Librarian, 6(3/4), 65-84.
9. Gatten, J. N. (1991). Paradigm restrictions on interdisciplinary research into librarianship. College and research libraries, 52, 575-584.
10. Hurd, J. M. (1992). Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization. College and Research Libraries, 53, 283-297.
11. Karki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: An author cocitation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 323-334.
12. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory & practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
13. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222.
14. Peritz, B. C. (1981). Citation characteristics in library science: Some further results from a bibliometric study. Library Research, 3, 55-65.
15. Pratt, A. D. (1977). A measure of class concentration in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 28, 285-292.
16. Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063.
17. Steele, T. W., & Stier, J. C. (2000). The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: A forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), 476-484.