Insights and innovations from wide crosses: Examples from canola and tomato

Crop Science

Volumn 47, Issue SUPPL. DEC., 2007, Pages

  Osborn, Thomas C ^a   Kramer, Chad ^b   Graham, Elaine ^a   Braun, Carl J ^a  

^a Seminis Vegetable Seeds   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 39749199111     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0012IPBS     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Alexander, L., R.E. Lincoln, and A. Wright. 1942. A survey of the genus Lycopersicon for resistance to the important tomato diseases occurring in Ohio and Indiana. Plant Dis. Rep. Suppl. 136:51-85.
2. Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, Y. Eshed, Y. Lopez, V. Petiard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir, and S. Tanksley. 1998. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:381-397.
3. Boswell, V.R. 1937. Improvement and genetics of tomatoes, peppers and eggplant. USDA Yearbook Agric. USDA, Beltsville, MD.
4. Butruille, D.V., R.P. Guries, and T.C. Osborn. 1999a. Increasing yield of spring oilseed rape hybrids (Brassica napus L.) through introgression of winter germplasm. Crop Sci. 39:1491-1496.
5. Butruille, D.V., R.P. Guries, and T.C. Osborn. 1999b. Linkage analysis of molecular markers and quantitative trait loci in populations of inbred backcross lines of Brassica napus L. Genetics 153:949-964.
6. Diers, B.W., P.B.E. McVetty, and T.C. Osborn. 1996. Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism markers in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Crop Sci. 36:79-83.
7. Diers, B.W., and T.C. Osborn. 1994. Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus germplasm based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:662-668.
8. Eshed, Y., and D. Zamir. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141:1147-1162.
9. Frary, A., S. Doganlar, A. Frampton, T. Fulton, J. Uhlig, H. Yates, and S. Tanksley. 2003. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for improved fruit characteristics from Lycopersicon chmielewskii chromosome 1. Genome 46:235-243.
10. Fridman, E., F. Carrari, Y. Liu, A.R. Fernie, and D. Zamir. 2004. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 305:1786-1789.
11. Fulton, T.M., P. Bucheli, E. Voirol, J. Lopez, V. Petiard, and S.D. Tanksley. 2002. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavor, identified in four advanced backcross populations of tomato. Euphytica 127:163-177.
12. Hansen, W.D. 1959. Early generation analysis of lengths of heterozygous chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrossing and selfing. Genetics 44:833-837.
13. Hoogstraten, J. 2002. Inbred tomato line FDR 16-2045. U.S. Patent 6,414,226. Date issued: July 2.
14. Hoogstraten, J.G.J., and C.J. Braun. 2005. Methods for coupling resistance alleles in tomato. U.S. Patent Pending 20050278804. Date published: Dec. 15
15. Hospital, F., C. Chevalet, and P. Mulsant. 1992. Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 132:1199-1210.
16. Kaeppler, S.M. 1997. Power analysis for quantitative trait locus mapping in populations derived by multiple backcrosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:618-621.
17. Kaloshian, I., J. Yaghoobi, T. Liharska, J. Hontelez, D. Hanson, P. Hogan, T. Jesse, J. Wijbrandi, G. Simons, P. Vos, P. Zabel, and V.M. Williamson. 1998. Genetic and physical localization of the root-knot nematode resistance locus Mi in tomato. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:376-385.
18. Kramer, C. 2007. Genetic characterization of exotic germplasm in spring-type Brassica napus L.: Validation, confirmation, tester complementation and prediction of hybrid seed yield quantitative trait loci. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison.
19. Ladizinsky, G. 1989. Ecological and genetic considerations in collecting and using wild relatives, p. 297-305. In A.H.D. Brown et al. (ed.) The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
20. Lefort-Buson, M., Y. Dattee, and B. Guillot-Lemoine. 1987. Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): Use of kinship coefficient. Genome 29:11-18.
21. Osborn, T.C., D.C. Alexander, and J.F. Fobes. 1987. Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit. Theor. Appl. Genet. 73:350-356.
22. Osborn, T.C., D.V. Butrulle, A.G. Sharpe, K.J. Pickering, I.A.P. Parkin, J.S. Parker, and D.J. Lydiate. 2003. Detection and effects of a homoeologous reciprocal transposition in Brassica napus. Genetics 165:1569-1577.
23. Quijada, P.A., I.J. Maureira, and T.C. Osborn. 2004a. Confirmation of QTL controlling seed yield in spring canola (Brassica napus L.) hybrids. Mol. Breed. 13:193-200.
24. Quijada, P.A., J.A. Udall, B. Lambert, and T.C. Osborn. 2006. Quantitative trait analysis of seed yield and other complex traits in hybrid spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): 1. Identification of genomic regions from winter germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113:549-561.
25. Quijada, P.A., J.A. Udall, H. Polewicz, R.D. Vogelzang, and T.C. Osborn. 2004b. Phenotypic effects of introgressing French winter germplasm into hybrid spring canola. Crop Sci. 44:1982-1989.
26. Rick, C.M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. Academic Press, London.
27. Seah, S., J. Yaghoobi, M. Rossi, C. Gleason, and V. Williamson. 2004. The nematode-resistance gene, Mi-1, is associated with an inverted chromosomal segment in susceptible compared to resistant tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108:1635-1642.
28. Sharpe, A.G., I.A.P. Parkin, D.J. Keith, and D.J. Lydiate. 1995. Frequent nonreciprocal translocations in the amphidiploid genome of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Genome 38:1112-1121.
29. Smith, J.S.C., and D.N. Duvick. 1989. Germplasm collections and the private plant breeder. p. 17-31. In A.H.D. Brown et al. (ed.) The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
30. Smith, P.G. 1944. Embryo culture of a tomato species. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44:413-416.
31. Song, K., K. Tang, and T.C. Osborn. 1993. Development of synthetic Brassica amphidiploids by reciprocal hybridization and comparison to natural amphidiploids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:811-821.
32. Stevens, M.A., and C.M. Rick. 1986. The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, New York.
33. Tanksley, S.D., and S.R. McCouch. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063-1066.
34. U, N. 1935. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jap. J. Bot. 7:289-452.
35. Udall, J.A., P.A. Quijada, and T.C. Osborn. 2005. Detection of chromosomal rearrangements derived from homoeologous recombination in four mapping populations of Brassica napus L. Genetics 169:967-979.
36. Udall, J.A., P.A. Quijada, and T.C. Osborn. 2006. Quantitative trait analysis of seed yield and other complex traits in hybrid spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L): 2. Identification of alleles from unadapted germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113:597-609.
37. Udall, J.A., P.A. Quijada, H. Polewicz, R. Vogelzang, and T.C. Osborn. 2004. Phenotypic effects of introgressing Chinese winter and resynthesized Brassica napus L. germplasm into hybrid spring canola. Crop Sci. 44:1990-1996.
38. Vavilov, N.I. 1940. The new systematics. Clarendon, Oxford, UK.
39. Weber, G., and G.B. Ramsey. 1926. Tomato diseases in Florida. Florida Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., Gainesville, FL.
40. Zamir, D., I. Ekstein-Michelson, Y. Zakay, N. Navot, M. Zeidan, M. Sarfatti, Y. Eshed, E. Harel, T. Pleban, H. v. Oss, N. Kedar, H.D. Rabinowitch, and H. Czosnek. 1994. Mapping and introgression of a tomato yellow leaf curl virus tolerance gene, TY-1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:141-146.
41. Zhong, X.B., J. Bodeau, P.F. Fransz, V.M. Williamson, A. van Kammen, J.H. de Jong, and P. Zabel. 1999. FISH to meiotic pachytene chromosomes of tomato locates the root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi-1 and the acid phosphatase gene Aps-1 near the junction of euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome arms 6S and 6L, respectively. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:365-370.