Design and evaluation of online courses containing media-enhanced learning materials;La conception et l’évaluation des cours en ligne contenant du matériel d’apprentissage enrichi par les medias;Entwurf und Auswertung von Online-Kursen, die mediengestützte Lernmaterialien enthalten;Sobre el diseño y evaluación de los cursos en línea incorporando materiales de aprendizaje enriquecidos por elementos multimedia

Educational Media International

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 199-218

  Lam, Paul ^a   McNaught, Carmel ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749194277     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980600641403     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alexander, S., and Hedberg, J., 1994. “ Evaluating technology-based learning: which model? ”. In Multimedia in higher education: designing for change in teaching and learning, Edited by: Beattie, K., McNaught, C., and Wills, S., 233–244. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
2. Anderson, L. W., and Krathwohl, D. R., 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Beaubien, J., 2002. “ Harnessing the power of complexity in an online learning environment ”. In Handbook of online learning, Edited by: Rudestan, K. E., and Schoenholtz-Read, J., 221–236. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Biggs, J., 2003. Teaching for quality learning at university, (2nd edn), Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
5. Biggs, J. B., and Collis, K. F., 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome), New York: Academic Press.
6. Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I, cognitive domain, New York: Longman.
7. Clarke, R. E., 1994. Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2): 21–29.
8. Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Hedberg, J. G., Turbill, J., Cambourne, B., and Jonassen, D., Operationalizing nine design elements of authentic learning environments in a classroom-based on-line simulation. ED-MEDIA 2005, Proceedings of the 17th Annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. June–2 July27, Montreal, Canada. Edited by: Richards, G., and Kommers, P., pp. 3096–3103. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
9. Green, T. D., and Brown, A., 2002. Multimedia projects in the classroom: a guide to development and evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S., 1981. Effective evaluation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., and Samldino, S., 1999. Instructional media and technologies for learning, (6th edn), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
12. Hills, H., 2003. Individual preferences in e-learning, Aldershot, UK: Gower.
13. 3Learning: a model of support for university academics to effectively use the web for teaching and learning. ED-MEDIA 2003, Proceedings of the 15th Annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. June23–28, Honolulu, HI, USA. Edited by: Lassner, D., and McNaught, C., pp. 3303–3310. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
14. Kennedy, G. E., 2004. Promoting cognition in multimedia interactivity research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(1): 43–61.
15. Kozma, R. B., 1994. Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(1): 7–19.
16. Krathwohl, D. R., 2002. A revision of Blooms’ taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4): 212–218.
17. McNaught, C., and Lam, P., 2005a. Building an evaluation culture and evidence base for e-learning in three Hong Kong universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4): 599–614.
18. McNaught, C., and Lam, P., What do teachers want to know about their student’s eLearning? A study of 70 evaluation plans. Balance, fidelity, mobility. Maintaining the momentum? Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education 2004 Conference. December4–7. Edited by: Goss, H., pp. 433–443. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. (Wollongong, Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education), Available online at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/50_McNaught.pdf (accessed 17 June 2006).
19. Papert, S., and Harel, I., 1991. Constructionism, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Reeves, T. C., and Hedberg, J. G., 2003. Interactive learning systems evaluation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
21. Rose, C., and Nicholl, M. J., 1997. Accelerated learning for the 21st century, London: Judy Platkus.
22. Sanders, D., Multimedia enhancements for African American history course: challenges and rewards. Disted 2005, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. August3–5, Madison, WI. School of Education, University of Wisconsin. Available online at: http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/05_1896.pdf (accessed 10 October 2005).
23. Schank, R. C., and Cleary, F., 1995. Engines for learning, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Scriven, M., 1993. Hard-won lessons in program evaluation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Vargo, J., Evaluating the effectiveness of Internet delivered Courseware. AusWeb97, Third Australian World Wide Web Conference. Edited by: Ellis, A., Lismore: Southern Cross University. Available online at: http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/proceedings/vargo/index.html (accessed 10 October 2005).