Efficacy of a planned behavior model: Beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1196-1215

  Smarkola, Claudia ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude measurement; Computer applications; Computer attitudes; Intention; Planned behavior; Teacher attitudes

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT; COMPUTER ATTITUDES; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; TEACHER ATTITUDES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 39749167907     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J., and Beckmann J. (Eds). Action control: From cognition to behavior (1985), Springer-Verlag, New York 11-39
2. Al-Gahtani S.S., and King M. Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 18 4 (1999) 277-297
3. Anfara Jr. V.A., Brown K.M., and Mangione T.L. Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher 31 7 (2002) 28-38
4. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action (1986), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
5. Becker H.J. How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26 3 (1994) 291-321
6. Becker H.J. Running to catch a moving train: Schools and information technologies. Theory Into Practice 37 1 (1998) 20-30
7. Bliss T.J., and Bliss L.L. Attitudinal responses to teacher professional development for the effective integration of educational technology. Journal of In-Service Education 29 1 (2003) 81-99
8. Brent R., Brawner C.E., and Van Dyk P. Factors influencing student teachers' use of technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 19 2 (2002) 61-68
9. Compeau D.R., and Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19 2 (1995) 189-211
10. Constas M.A. Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal 29 2 (1992) 253-266
11. Cuban L. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classrooms (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (1989) 319-340
13. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 (1993) 475-487
14. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
15. Davis F.D., and Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 45 (1996) 19-45
16. Dawson C., and Rakes G.C. The influence of principals' technology training on the integration of technology into schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 1 (2003) 29-49
17. Doering A., Hughes J., and Huffman D. Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 35 3 (2003) 342-361
18. Doll W.J., Hendrickson A., and Deng X. Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: A confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision Sciences 29 4 (1998) 839-869
19. Driscoll M. Computers for what? Examining the roles of technology in teaching and learning. Educational Research and Evaluation 7 2-3 (2001) 335-349
20. Ertmer R.A., Addison P., Lane M., Ross E., and Woods D. Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32 1 (1999) 54-73
21. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior (1975), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, Reading, MA
22. Gibson S., and Nocente N. Addressing instructional technology needs in faculties of education. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 64 3 (1998) 320-331
23. Granger C.A., Morbey M.L., Lotherington H., Owston R.D., and Wideman H.H. Factors contributing to teachers' successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18 (2002) 480-488
24. Hadley M., and Sheingold K. Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers. American Journal of Education 101 (1993) 261-315
25. Hendrickson A.R., and Collins M.R. An assessment of structure and causation of IS usage. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 27 2 (1996) 61-67
26. Igbaria M. User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 21 1 (1993) 73-90
27. Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., and Davis G.B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 4 (1995) 87-114
28. Igbaria M., Parasuraman S., and Baroudi J.J. A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems 13 1 (1996) 127-143
29. Karahanna E., and Straub D.W. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management 35 (1999) 237-250
30. Kay R. An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes toward computers: The computer attitude measure (CAM). Computers in Human Behavior 9 (1993) 371-386
31. Lanahan L. Beyond school-level Internet access: Support for instructional use of technology (NCES 2002-029) (2002), U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC
32. Lowther D.L., Bassoppo-Moyo T., and Morrison G.R. Moving from computer literate to technologically competent: The next educational reform. Computers in Human Behavior 14 1 (1998) 93-109
33. Marcinkiewicz H.R. Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26 2 (1994) 220-237
34. Mathieson K. Predicting use intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2 3 (1991) 173-191
35. Merriam S.B. Qualitative research and case study applications in education (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
36. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? Retrieved 22.2.2002.
37. Mouza C. Learning to teach with new technology: Implications for professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 35 2 (2003) 272-289
38. Mowrer-Popiel E., Pollard C., and Pollard R. An analysis of the perceptions of preservice teachers toward technology and its use in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology 21 2 (1994) 131-138
39. Schnackenberg H.L., Luik K., Nisan Y.C., and Servant C. A case study of needs assessment in teacher in-service development. Educational Research and Evaluation 7 2-3 (2001) 137-160
40. Smerdon B., Cronen S., Lanahan L., Anderson J., Iannotti N., and Angeles J. Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology (NCES Publication No. 2000-102) (2000), U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Statistics, Washington, DC
41. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42 1 (1996) 85-92
42. Tashakkori A., and Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
43. Taylor S., and Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 144-176
44. Triandis H.C. Attitude and attitude change (1971), John Wiley & Sons, New York
45. U.S. Congress. (2000). Goals 2000 Educational Act. Retrieved 31.10.2001.
46. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616) (1995), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
47. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No child left behind act of 2001. Retrieved 21.11.2003.
48. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education-How the Internet, the law and today's students are revolutionizing expectations: National education technology plan 2004. Retrieved 16.10.2006.
49. Willis E.M., and Sujo de Montes L. Does requiring a technology course in preservice teacher education affect student teacher's technology use in the classroom?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 18 3 (2002) 76-80
50. Windschitl M., and Sahl K. Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal 39 1 (2002) 165-205