Multi-facilities tactical planning robustness with experimental design

Production Planning and Control

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 171-182

  Genin, P ^a   Lamouri, S ^a   Thomas, A ^b  

^a Laboratory of Integrated Engineering of Mechanical Systems and Materials LISMMA (EA2336)   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

APS systems; Process modelling; Robustness; Supply chain planning; Tactical planning

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; FACILITIES; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

APS SYSTEMS; PROCESS MODELLING; SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING; TACTICAL PLANNING;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 39749142522     PISSN: 09537287     EISSN: 13665871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537280801896250     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Artigues, C., Billaut, J.C., and Esswein, C., 2005. Maximisation of solution flexibility for robust shop scheduling. European journal of operational research, 165 (2), 314-328.
2. Blackburn, J.D., Kropp, H.D., and Millen, R.A., 1986. Comparison of strategies to dampen nervousness in MRP systems. Management science, 32 (4), 413-429.
3. Carlson, R.C., Beckman, S.L., and Kropp, D.H., 1982. The effectiveness of extending the horizon in rolling production schedules. Decision sciences, 13 (1), 129-146.
4. Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J., and Simchi-Levi, D., 1998. The bullwhip effect: managerial insights on the impact of forecasting and information on variability in a supply chain, In: S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan and M. Magazine, eds. Quantitative models for supply chain management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 418-437.
5. Croom, S., Romano, P., and Giannakis, M., 2000. Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 6, 67-83.
6. Davenport, A.J. and Beck, J.C., A survey of techniques for scheduling with uncertainty. Available from: www-poleia.lip6.fr/~sourd/gotha/index.html [Accessed 1 January 2000].
7. De Kok, A.G. and Inderfurth, K., 1997. Nervousness in inventory management: comparison of basic control rules. European journal of operational research, 103, 55-82.
8. Durieux, S. and Pierreval, H., 2003. Comparison of several design solutions of a real industrial manufacturing system using simulation and risk analysis. Industrial engineering and production management conference, 2, 145-154.
9. Fleischmann, B., Meyr, H., and Wagner, M., 2000. Advanced planning. In: H. Stadtler and C. Kilger, eds. Supply chain management and advanced planning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 57-71.
10. Forrester, J.W., 1961. Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fowlkes, W.Y. and Creveling, C.M., eds, 1997. Engineering methods for robust product design: using Taguchi methods® in technology and product development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
12. Heisig, G., 1998. Planning stability under (s, S) inventory control rules. OR spektrum, 20 (4), 215-228.
13. Ho, C., 1989. Evaluating the impact of operating environments on MRP system nervousness. International journal of production research, 27, 1115-1135.
14. Jensen, T., 1993. Measuring and improving planning stability of reorder point lot-sizing policies. International journal of production economics, 30/31, 167-178.
15. Kadipasaoglu, S.N. and Sridharan, V., 1995. Alternative approaches for reducing schedule instability in multi-stage manufacturing under demand uncertainty. Journal of operations management, 13, 193-211.
16. Kimms, A., 1998. Stability measures for rolling schedules with applications to capacity expansion planning, master production scheduling, and lot sizing. International journal of management science, 26 (3), 355-366.
17. Kleijnen, J.P.C. and Gaury, E., 2003. Short-term robustness of production management systems: A case study. European journal of operational research, 148, 452-465.
18. Koltaï, T. and Terlaky, T., 2000. The difference between the managerial and mathematical interpretation of sensitivity analysis results in linear programming. International journal of production economics, 65, 257-274.
19. Landeghem, H. and Vanmaele, H., 2002. Robust planning: a new paradigm for demand chain planning. Journal of operations management, 319, 1-15.
20. Lasserre, J.B. and Mercè, C., 1990. Robust hierarchical production planning under uncertainty. Annals of operations research, 26, 73-87.
21. Lee, J.H. and Yu, Z.H., 1997. Worst-case formulations of model predictive control for systems with bounded parameters. Automatica, 33, 765-781.
22. Leung, S.C.H. and Wu, Y., 2004. A robust optimisation for stochastic aggregate production planning. Production planning & control, 15 (5), 502-514.
23. Lim, J.M., Kim, K.S., Yum, B.J., and Hwang, H., 1996. Determination of an optimal configuration of operating policies for direct-input-output manufacturing systems using the Taguchi method. Computers industrial engineering, 31, 555-560.
24. Mezgar, I., Egresits, C.S., and Monostori, L., 1997. Design and real-time reconfiguration of robust manufacturing systems by using design of experiments and artificial neural networks. Computers in industry, 33, 61-70.
25. Minifie, J.R. and Davis, R.A., 1990. Interaction effects on MRP nervousness. International journal of production research, 28, 173-183.
26. Mulvey, J.M. and Ruszczynski, A., 1995. A new scenario decomposition method for large-scale stochastic optimisation. Operations research, 43 (3), 477-490.
27. Mulvey, J.M., Vanderbei, R.J., and Zenios, S.A., 1995. Robust optimisation of large-scale systems. Operations research, 43 (2), 264-281.
28. Orlicky, J., 1975. Material requirements planning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29. Pujawan, I.N., 2004. Schedule nervousness in a manufacturing system: A case study. Production planning & control, 15 (5), 515-524.
30. Roy, B., 1998. A missing link in OR-DA: robustness analysis. Foundations of computing and decision sciences, 23, 141-160.
31. Shang, J.S., Li, S., and Tadikamalla, P., 2004. Operational design of a supply chain system using the Taguchi method, response surface methodology, simulation, and optimisation. International journal of production research, 42 (8), 3823-3849.
32. Sridharan, S.V. and Laforge, R.L., 1990. An analysis of alternative policies to achieve schedule stability. Journal of manufacturing and operations management, 3, 53-73.
33. Stadtler, H. and Kilger, C., 2000. Supply chain management and advanced planning: concepts models, software and case studies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
34. Taguchi, G., 1987. Orthogonal arrays and linear graph. Livonia, MI: American Supplier Institute Press.
35. Towill, D.R., 1991. Supply chain dynamics. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing, 4 (4), '197-208.
36. Van Donselaar, K., Van Den Nieuwenhof, J., and Visschers, J., 2000. The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains. International journal of production economics, 68, 169-176.
37. Vollmann, T.E., Berry, W.L., and Whybark, D.C., 1997. Manufacturing planning and control systems, 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
38. Walter, D., 2005. Performance planning and control in virtual business structures. Production planning & control, 16 (2), 226-239.
39. Yano, C.A. and Carlson, R.C., 1987. Interaction between frequency of rescheduling and the role of safety stock in material requirements planning systems. International journal of production research, 25, 221-232.
40. Yu, C.-S. and Li, H.-L., 2000. A robust optimisation model for stochastic logistic problems. International journal of production economics, 64, 385-397.
41. Zäpfel, G., 1998. Customer-order-driven production: an economical concept for responding to demand uncertainty. International journal of production economics, 56/57, 699-709.
42. Zhao, X. and Lee, T.S., 1993. Freezing the master production schedule for material requirements planning systems under demand uncertainty. Journal of operations management, 11 (2), 185-205.