Accuracy of Ultrasound-Based (BAT) Prostate-Repositioning: A Three-Dimensional On-Line Fiducial-Based Assessment With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1247-1255

  Boda Heggemann, Judit ^a   Köhler, Frederick Marc ^a   Küpper, Beate ^a   Wolff, Dirk ^a   Wertz, Hansjörg ^a   Mai, Sabine ^a   Hesser, Jürgen ^a   Lohr, Frank ^a   Wenz, Frederik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cone beam CT; Fiducial; Image guidance; Prostate; Ultrasound based positioning

Indexed keywords

BONE; CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE MATCHING; RADIOTHERAPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; ULTRASONICS;

BONY STRUCTURES; IMAGE GUIDANCE; PROSTATE; ULTRASOUND-BASED POSITIONING;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS;

IODINE 125;

ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; BONE STRUCTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND;

ALGORITHMS; CALCINOSIS; CALIBRATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IODINE RADIOISOTOPES; MALE; PELVIC BONES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC DISEASES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED;

EID: 39749101847     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Asbell S.O., Martz K.L., Pilepich M.V., et al. Impact of surgical staging in evaluating the radiotherapeutic outcome in RTOG phase III study for A2 and B prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17 (1989) 945-951
2. Bagshaw M.A., Cox R.S., and Hancock S.L. Control of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: Long-term results. J Urol 152 5 Pt 2 (1994) 1781-1785
3. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Kaplan I., et al. Equivalent 5-year bNED in select prostate cancer patients managed with surgery or radiation therapy despite exclusion of the seminal vesicles from the CTV. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39 (1997) 335-340
4. Keyser D., Kupelian P.A., Zippe C.D., et al. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level < or = 10 ng/ml: Radiation therapy or surgery?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38 (1997) 723-729
5. Kupelian P.A., Buchsbaum J.C., Elshaikh M., et al. Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above. Cancer 95 (2002) 2302-2307
6. Powell C.R., Huisman T.K., Riffenburgh R.H., et al. Outcome for surgically staged localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy. J Urol 157 (1997) 1754-1759
7. Frank S.J., Grimm P.D., Sylvester J.E., et al. Interstitial implant alone or in combination with external beam radiation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A survey of practice patterns in the United States. Brachytherapy 6 (2007) 2-8
8. Sylvester J.E., Blasko J.C., Grimm P.D., et al. Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival after external beam radiation and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: The Seattle experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 944-952
9. Crook J.M., Raymond Y., Salhani D., et al. Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. Radiother Oncol 37 (1995) 35-42
10. Ghilezan M.J., Jaffray D.A., Siewerdsen J.H., et al. Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 406-417
11. Nichol A.M., Brock K.K., Lockwood G.A., et al. A magnetic resonance imaging study of prostate deformation relative to implanted gold fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 48-56
12. Balter J.M., Sandler H.M., Lam K., et al. Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31 (1995) 113-118
13. Britton K.R., Takai Y., Mitsuya M., et al. Evaluation of inter- and intrafraction organ motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer measured by a newly developed on-board image-guided system. Radiat Med 23 (2005) 14-24
14. Deurloo K.E., Steenbakkers R.J., Zijp L.J., et al. Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 (2005) 228-238
15. Huang E., Dong L., Chandra A., et al. Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 261-268
16. Pollack A., Zagars G.K., Starkschall G., et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M.D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 1097-1105
17. Wertz H., Boda-Heggemann J., Walter C., et al. Image-guided in vivo dosimetry for quality assurance of IMRT treatment for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 288-295
18. de Crevoisier R., Tucker S.L., Dong L., et al. Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 965-973
19. Ghilezan M., Yan D., Liang J., et al. Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (2004) 1602-1610
20. Wong J.R., Grimm L., Uematsu M., et al. Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT-linear accelerator combination: Prostate movements and dosimetric considerations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 (2005) 561-569
21. Heemsbergen W.D., Hoogeman M.S., Witte M.G., et al. Increased risk of biochemical and clinical failure for prostate patients with a large rectum at radiotherapy planning: Results from the Dutch trial of 68 GY versus 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 1418-1424
22. Rudat V., Flentje M., Oetzel D., et al. Influence of the positioning error on 3D conformal dose distributions during fractionated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 33 (1994) 56-63
23. Hurkmans C.W., Remeijer P., Lebesque J.V., et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 58 (2001) 105-120
24. Enmark M., Korreman S., and Nystrom H. IGRT of prostate cancer: Is the margin reduction gained from daily IG time-dependent?. Acta Oncol 45 (2006) 907-914
25. O'Daniel J.C., Dong L., Zhang L., et al. Dosimetric comparison of four target alignment methods for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (2006) 883-891
26. Chandra A., Dong L., Huang E., et al. Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56 (2003) 436-447
27. Lattanzi J., McNeeley S., Donnelly S., et al. Ultrasound-based stereotactic guidance in prostate cancer-quantification of organ motion and set-up errors in external beam radiation therapy. Comput Aided Surg 5 (2000) 289-295
28. Lohr F., Fuss M., Tiefenbacher U., et al. [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer]. Urologe A 43 (2004) 43-51
29. Morr J., DiPetrillo T., Tsai J.S., et al. Implementation and utility of a daily ultrasound-based localization system with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 1124-1129
30. Serago C.F., Chungbin S.J., Buskirk S.J., et al. Initial experience with ultrasound localization for positioning prostate cancer patients for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 1130-1138
31. Lattanzi J., McNeeley S., Hanlon A., et al. Ultrasound-based stereotactic guidance of precision conformal external beam radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 55 (2000) 73-78
32. Langen K.M., Pouliot J., Anezinos C., et al. Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 635-644
33. Lattanzi J., McNeeley S., Pinover W., et al. A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43 (1999) 719-725
34. McNair H.A., Mangar S.A., Coffey J., et al. A comparison of CT- and ultrasound-based imaging to localize the prostate for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006) 678-687
35. Langen K.M., Zhang Y., Andrews R.D., et al. Initial experience with megavoltage (MV) CT guidance for daily prostate alignments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 1517-1524
36. Scarbrough T.J., Golden N.M., Ting J.Y., et al. Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006) 378-387
37. Peignaux K, Truc G, Barillot I, A et al. Clinical assessment of the use of the Sonarray system for daily prostate localization. Radiother Oncol 2006;81:176-178.
38. Hua C., Lovelock D.M., Mageras G.S., et al. Development of a semi-automatic alignment tool for accelerated localization of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55 (2003) 811-824
39. Kupelian P.A., Langen K.M., Willoughby T.R., et al. Daily variations in the position of the prostate bed in patients with prostate cancer receiving postoperative external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (2006) 593-596
40. Moseley D.J., White E.A., Wiltshire K.L., et al. Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 942-953
41. Walter C., Boda-Heggemann J., Wertz H., et al. In vivo dose measurements of extra dose from cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (2006) 632 author reply 632
42. McBain C.A., Henry A.M., Sykes J., et al. X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: The new standard in on-treatment imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64 (2006) 625-634
43. Schallenkamp J.M., Herman M.G., Kruse J.J., et al. Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2005) 800-811
44. Hsu A., Pawlicki T., Luxton G., et al. A study of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducials for localized prostate cancer including pelvic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68 (2007) 898-902
45. Chen J., Lee R.J., Handrahan D., et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using implanted fiducial markers with daily portal imaging: Assessment of prostate organ motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68 (2007) 912-919
46. Serago C.F., Buskirk S.J., Igel T.C., et al. Comparison of daily megavoltage electronic portal imaging or kilovoltage imaging with marker seeds to ultrasound imaging or skin marks for prostate localization and treatment positioning in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006) 1585-1592
47. Harris E.J., McNair H.A., and Evans P.M. Feasibility of fully automated detection of fiducial markers implanted into the prostate using electronic portal imaging: A comparison of methods. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (2006) 1263-1270
48. Dehnad H., Nederveen A.J., van der Heide U.A., et al. Clinical feasibility study for the use of implanted gold seeds in the prostate as reliable positioning markers during megavoltage irradiation. Radiother Oncol 67 (2003) 295-302
49. Chung P.W., Haycocks T., Brown T., et al. On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (2004) 329-334
50. Litzenberg D., Dawson L.A., Sandler H., et al. Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52 (2002) 699-703
51. Fuss M., Cavanaugh S.X., Fuss C., et al. Daily stereotactic ultrasound prostate targeting: Inter-user variability. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2 (2003) 161-170
52. Dong J., Crevoisier R., Bonnen M., et al. Evaluation of an ultrasound-based prostate target localization technique with an in-room CT-on-rails. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 Suppl. (2004) S332-S333
53. Dawson L.A., Eccles C., Bissonnette J.P., et al. Accuracy of daily image guidance for hypofractionated liver radiotherapy with active breathing control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 1247-1252
54. Walter C., Wertz H., Steil V., et al. Messungen zur Qualitätssicherung am Cone-beam CT. Strahlenther Onkol 182 (2006) 95
55. Dobler B., Mai S., Ross C., et al. Evaluation of possible prostate displacement induced by pressure applied during transabdominal ultrasound image acquisition. Strahlenther Onkol 182 (2006) 240-246
56. van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 14 (2004) 52-64
57. Bijhold J., Lebesque J.V., Hart A.A., et al. Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 24 (1992) 261-271
58. Langen K.M., and Jones D.T. Organ motion and its management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50 (2001) 265-278
59. Cury F.L., Shenouda G., Souhami L., et al. Ultrasound-based image guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Comparison of cross-modality and intramodality methods for daily localization during external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (2006) 1562-1567
60. Artignan X., Smitsmans M.H., Lebesque J.V., et al. Online ultrasound image guidance for radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Impact of image acquisition on prostate displacement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59 (2004) 595-601
61. Wertz H., Lohr F., Dobler B., et al. [Dosimetric impact of image-guided translational isocenter correction for 3-D conformal radiotherapy of the prostate]. Strahlenther Onkol 183 (2007) 203-210
62. Wertz H., Lohr F., Dobler B., et al. Dosimetric consequences of translational isocenter correction based on image guidance for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of the prostate. Phys Med Biol 52 (2007) 5655-5665
63. Poggi M.M., Gant D.A., Sewchand W., et al. Marker seed migration in prostate localization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56 (2003) 1248-1251
64. Pouliot J., Aubin M., Langen K.M., et al. (Non)-migration of radiopaque markers used for on-line localization of the prostate with an electronic portal imaging device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56 (2003) 862-866
65. Kupelian P.A., Willoughby T.R., Meeks S.L., et al. Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: Monitoring intermarker distances during radiation therapy to test for marker stability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 1291-1296
66. Reed D.R., Wallner K.E., Merrick G.S., et al. A prospective randomized comparison of stranded vs. loose 125I seeds for prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 6 (2007) 129-134
67. Merrick G.S., Butler W.M., Dorsey A.T., et al. Prostatic conformal brachytherapy: 125I/103Pd postoperative dosimetric analysis. Radiat Oncol Investig 5 (1997) 305-313
68. Lee W.R., deGuzman A.F., Tomlinson S.K., et al. Radioactive sources embedded in suture are associated with improved postimplant dosimetry in men treated with prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 65 (2002) 123-127
69. Boggula R., et al. A proposed strategy to implement CBCT images for replanning and dose calculations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69 Suppl. (2007) S655-S656
70. Meyer J., Wilbert J., Baier K., et al. Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 1220-1228