Reassessing (home-)regionalisation

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 184-196

  Osegowitsch, Thomas ^a   Sammartino, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Global strategy; Globalisation; Regional strategy; Regionalisation; Semi globalisation; Triad

Indexed keywords

EID: 39649122658     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400345     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aharoni, Y. 1971. On the definition of a multinational corporation. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 11 (3): 27-37.
2. Aharoni, Y. 2006. Book review: Alan M. Rugman, The regional multinationals. MNEs and global strategic management. International Business Review, 15(4): 439-446.
3. Asmussen, C. G. 2006. Local, regional or global? Quantifying MNC geographic scope. SMG Working Paper 14/2006, Centre for Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School.
4. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Benito, G. R. J., & Gripsrud, G. 1992. The expansion of foreign direct investments: Discrete location choices or a cultural learning process? Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3): 461-476.
6. Cembureau 2007. 2005 World cement production by region. http://www.cembureau.be/Documents/KeyFacts/STATISTICS/ World%20Cement%20Production%20by%20Region.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2007.
7. Collinson, S. C. & Rugman, A. M. 2008. The regional nature of Japanese multinational business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2): 215-230.
8. Dunning, J. H., Fujita, M., & Yakova, N. 2007. Some macro-data on the regionalisation/globalisation debate: A comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1): 177-199.
9. Economist 1997. One world?. 18 October: 79-81.
10. Economist 2007. Billion dollar pills. 25 January: 61-64.
11. Enright, M. 2005. Regional management centers in the Asia-Pacific. Management International Review, 45(Special Issue 1): 59-82.
12. Euromonitor 2000. Pharmaceuticals: A world survey. World market overview. Global Report, 2 June, Global Market Information Database. https://www.euromonitor.com/. Accessed 3 January 2007.
13. Euromonitor 2005. the world market for dairy products. Global Report, 7 June, Global Market Information Database, https://www.euromonitor. com/. Accessed 3 January 2007.
14. Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters. Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 137-147.
15. Ghemawat, P. 2003. Semiglobalization and international business strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 138-152.
16. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603-625.
17. Ghoshal, S., & Westney, D. E. 1993. Introduction and overview. In S. Ghoshal and D. E. Westney (eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation: 1-23. New York: St Martin's Press.
18. Hejazi, W. 2007. Reconsidering the concentration of US MNE activity: Is it global, regional or national? Management International Review, 47(1): 5-27.
19. Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. 1975. The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3): 305-322.
20. Nokia 2003. Nokia in 2002. http://www.nokia.com/A4126499. Accessed 28 March 2007.
21. Ohmae, K. 1985. Triad power: The coming shape of global competition. New York: The Free Press.
22. Osegowitsch, T., & Sammartino, A. 2007. Exploring trends in regionalisation. In A. M. Rugman (ed.), Research in global strategic management, vol. 13, Regional aspects of multinationality and performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 45-64.
23. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Rugman, A. M. 2000. The end of globalization. London: Random House.
25. Rugman, A. M. 2005. The regional multinationals: MNEs and "global" strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Rugman, A. M., & Brain, C. 2003. Multinational enterprises are regional, not global. Multinational Business Review, 11(1): 3-12.
27. Rugman, A. M., & Hodgetts, R. M. 2001. The end of global strategy. European Management Journal, 19(4): 333-343.
28. Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. 2007. Multinationality and regional performance, 2001-2005. In A. M. Rugman (ed.), Research In global strategic management, vol. 13, Regional aspects of multinationality and performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 31-43.
29. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761-771.
30. Rugman, A. M., &t Verbeke, A. 2004a. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 3-18.
31. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004b. Regional transnationals and triad strategy. Transnational Corporations, 13(3): 1-19.
32. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2005. Towards a theory of regional multinationals: A transaction cost economics approach. Management International Review, 45(Special Issue 1): 5-17.
33. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2007. Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: A response to Dunning et al. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1): 200-205.
34. Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2): 113-127.
35. Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15(6): 285-305.
36. Westney, E. 2006. Book review: The regional multinationals: MNEs and "global" strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 445-449.
37. Yip, G., Rugman, A. M., & Kudina, A. 2006. International success of British companies. Long Range Planning, 39(3): 241-264.
38. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341-363.