Multinational Enterprises Are Regional, Not Global

Multinational Business Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-12

  Rugman, Alan M ^a   Brain, Cecilia ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Foreign direct investment; International business; Multinational enterprises; Regionalisation; Stategic management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993043332     PISSN: 1525383X     EISSN: 20541686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/1525383X200300001     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Bartlett, C. & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard BusinessSchool Press.
2. Gestrin, M., Knight, R. & Rugman, A. 1999. The Templeton global performance index. Templeton College: University of Oxford.
3. Gestrin, M., Knight, R. & Rugman, A. 2000. The Templeton global performance index 2000. Templeton College: University of Oxford.
4. Gestrin, M., Knight, R. & Rugman, A. 2001. The Templeton global performance index 2001. Templeton College: University of Oxford.
5. Govindarajan, V. & Gupta, A. 2001. The quest for global dominance. San Francisco: Josey-Bass/Wiley.
6. teannet, J. 2000. Managing with a global mindset. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall Pearson.
7. Rugman, A. 1990. Multinationals and Canada-United States free trade. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.
8. Rugman, A. 2000. The end of globalization. London: Random House & New York: Amacom-McGraw Hill.
9. Rugman, A. & D'Cruz, J. 1993. The ‘double diamond’ model of international competitiveness Management International Review, 33(2):17-39.
10. Rugman, A. & Girod, S. 2003. Retail multinationals and globalization: the evidence is regional. European Management Journal, 21(1): 24-37.
11. Stopford, t. & Dunning, t. 1983. Multinationals:Company performance and global trends. London: Mcmillan.
12. Yip, G. 2002. Total global strategy II. Upper Saddle River, N.t.: Prentice Hall.