Estimating levels of inbreeding using AFLP markers

Heredity

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 286-295

  Dasmahapatra, K K ^a   Lacy, R C ^b   Amos, W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BROOKFIELD ZOO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AFLP; Inbreeding; Microsatellites; Peromyscus; Relatedness

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; CAPTIVE BREEDING; ESTIMATION METHOD; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MODELING; POLYMORPHISM; RELATEDNESS; RODENT; WILD POPULATION;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; INBREEDING; METHODOLOGY; PEROMYSCUS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PEROMYSCUS;

MUS; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS SUBGRISEUS;

EID: 39549116278     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801075     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Spraker TR, Lyons E, Melin SR, Gulland F, Delong RL et al. (2006). Contrasting effects of heterozygosity on survival and hookworm resistance in California sea lion pups. Mol Ecol 15: 1973-1982.
2. Amos W, Wilmer JW, Fullard K, Burg TM, Croxall JP, Bloch D et al. (2001). The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 2021-2027.
3. Ballou JD (1997). Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J Hered 88: 169-178.
4. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T (2004). Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol Ecol 13: 3021-3031.
5. Blouin MS, Parsons M, Lacaille V, Lotz S (1996). Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol 5: 393-401.
6. Bonnet E, Van de Peer Y (2002). Zt: a software for simple and partial Mantel tests 7: 1-12.
7. Chirhart SE, Honeycutt RL, Greenbaum IF (2000). Microsatellite markers for the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus. Mol Ecol 9: 1669-1671.
8. Coltman DW, Bowen WD, Wright JM (1998). Birth weight and neonatal survival of harbour seal pups are positively correlated with genetic variation measured by microsatellites. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 803-809.
9. Coltman DW, Pilkington JG, Smith JA, Pemberton JM (1999). Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a free-living island population. Evolution 53: 1259-1267.
10. Coulson T, Albon S, Slate J, Pemberton JM (1999). Microsatellite loci reveal sex-dependent responses to inbreeding and outbreeding in red deer calves. Evolution 53: 1951-1960.
11. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270.
12. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetic Theory. Harper & Row: New York.
13. Ellegren H (1999). Inbreeding and relatedness in Scandinavian grey wolves Canis lupus. Hereditas 130: 239-244.
14. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
15. Greenwood P, Harvey P, Perrins C (1978). Inbreeding and dispersal in the great tit. Nature 271: 52-54.
16. Hardy OJ (2003). Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Mol Ecol 12: 1577-1588.
17. Hauser TP, Loeschke V (1996). Drought stress and inbreeding depression in Lychnis flos-cucli (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 50: 1119-1126.
18. 2), and reproductive traits in chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59: 77-84.
19. 2, a microsatellite measure of inbreeding and outbreeding, in wolves with a known pedigree. Evolution 55: 1256-1260.
20. Hoffman JI, Boyd IL, Amos W (2004). Exploring the relationship between parental relatedness and male reproductive success in the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella. Evolution 58: 2087-2099.
21. Holsinger KE, Lewis PO, Dey DK (2002). A Bayesian approach to inferring population structure from dominant markers. Mol Ecol 11: 1157-1164.
22. Houle D (1989). Allozyme-associated heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 123: 789-801.
23. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985). Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA. Nature 314: 67-73.
24. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, vandeWiel C et al. (1997). Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breed 3: 381-390.
25. Keller LF (1998). Inbreeding and its fitness effects in an insular population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 52: 240-250.
26. Keller LF, Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K (2007). Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches. Evolution 56: 1229-1239.
27. Kempenaers B, Adriaensen F, van Noordwijk AJ, Dhondt AA (1996). Genetic similarity, inbreeding and hatching failure in blue tits: are unhatched eggs infertile? Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 179-185.
28. Krauss SL (1999). Complete exclusion of nonsires in an analysis of paternity in a natural plant population using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Mol Ecol 8: 217-226.
29. Kuhnlein U, Zadworny D, Dawe Y, Fairfull RW, Gavora JS (1990). Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens. Genetics 125: 161-165.
30. Lacy RC, Alaks G, Walsh A (1996). Hierarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution 50: 2187-2200.
31. Lacy RC, Ballou JD (1998). Effectiveness of selection in reducing the genetic load in populations of Peromyscus polionotus during generations of inbreeding. Evolution 50: 2187-2200.
32. Lande R (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 39: 24-40.
33. Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994). Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3: 91-99.
34. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999). Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152: 1753-1766.
35. Madden JR, Lowe TJ, Fuller HV, Coe RL, Dasmahapatra KK, Amos W et al. (2004). Neighbouring male spotted bowerbirds are not related, but do maraud each other. Anim Behav 68: 751-758.
36. Marshall TC, Coltman DW, Pemberton JM, Slate J, Spalton JA, Guinness FE et al. (2002). Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 1533-1539.
37. Menotti-Raymond M, O'Brien SJ (1995). Evolutionary conservation of ten microsatellite loci in four species of Felidae. J Hered 86: 319-322.
38. Merila J, Sheldon B, Griffith S (2003). Heterotic effects on fitness in a wild bird population. Ann Zool Fenn 40: 269-280.
39. Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LL (1999). AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 389-394.
40. Parsons YM, Shaw KL (2001). Species boundaries and genetic diversity among Hawaiian crickets of the genus Laupala identified using amplified fragment polymorphism. Mol Ecol 10: 1765-1772.
41. Pemberton JM, Albon S, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH (1991). Countervailing selection in different fitness components in female red deer. Evolution 45: 93-103.
42. Pray LA, Goodnight CJ (1995). Genetic variation in inbreeding depression in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 49: 176-188.
43. Primmer CR, Moller AP, Ellegren H (1996). A wide-ranging survey of cross-species microsatellite amplification in birds. Mol Ecol 5: 365-378.
44. Prince K, Glenn T, Dewey M (2002). Cross-species amplification among Peromyscines of new microsatellite DNA loci from the oldfield mouse (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 133-136.
45. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989). Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258-275.
46. Questiau S, Eybert MC, Taberlet P (1999). Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers reveal extra-pair parentage in a bird species: the bluethroat (Luscinia svecica). Mol Ecol 8: 1331-1339.
47. Ralls K, Ballou JD, Templeton A (1988). Estimation of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conserv Biol 2: 185-193.
48. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995). GENEPOP (version 1.2) population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
49. Ritland K (1996). Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 67: 175-185.
50. Ritland K (2005). Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers. Mol Ecol 14: 3157-3165.
51. Ritland K, Travis S (2004). Inferences involving individual coefficients of relatedness and inbreeding in natural populations of Abies. For Ecol Manage 197: 171-180.
52. Rosendahl S, Taylor JW (1997). Development of multiple genetic markers for studies of genetic variation in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using AFLP.™ Mol Ecol 6: 821-829.
53. Sambrook J, Fritsh EF, Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York.
54. Schmidt CA (1999). Variance and congruence of microsatellite markers for Peromyscus leucopus. J Mammal 80: 522-529.
55. Siemer BL, Harrington CS, Nielsen EM, Borck B, Nielsen NL, Engberg J et al. (2004). Genetic relatedness among Campylobacter jejuni serotyped isolates of diverse origin as determined by numerical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) profiles. J Appl Microbiol 96: 795-802.
56. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Glass BC, Broad TE et al. (2004). Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93: 255-265.
57. Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Marshall TC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2000). Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elephas). Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 1657-1662.
58. Stebbins GL (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press: New York.
59. Stephens JC, Gilbert DA, Yuhki N, O'Brien SJ (1992). Estimation of heterozygosity for single-probe multilocus DNA fingerprints. Mol Biol Evol 9: 729-743.
60. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Lee Tvd, Hornes M et al. (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407-4414.
61. Walsh P, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991). Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10: 506-513.
62. Wang JL (2002). An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160: 1203-1215.
63. Wang JL (2004). Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers. Mol Ecol 13: 3169-3178.
64. Williams J, Kubelik A, Livak K, Rafalski J, Tingey S (1990). DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 6531-6535.
65. Wright S (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 56: 330-338.