An IRT analysis of the personal optimism scale

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-56

  Rauch, Wolfgang A ^a   Schweizer, Karl ^a   Moosbrugger, Helfried ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Item response theory; Model data fit; Optimism

Indexed keywords

EID: 39549087680     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.49     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Caprara, G.V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults' prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 77-89.
2. Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Chan, K., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. (2001). Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 523-562.
3. Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B.W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumption of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88-106.
4. DiStefano, C., & Motl, R.W (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440-464.
5. Drasgow, F., Levine, M.V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A.D. (1995). Fitting polychotomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 143-165.
6. Flora, D.B., & Curran, P.J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor models with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466-491.
7. Herzberg, P.Y., Glaesmer, H., & Hoyer, J. (2006). Separating optimism and pessimism: A robust psychometric analysis of the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Psychological Assessment, 18, 433-438.
8. Holland, P.W., & Hoskens, M. (2003). Classical test theory as a first-order item response theory: Application to true-score prediction from a possibly nonparallel test. Psychometrika, 68, 123-149.
9. Jöreskog, K.G., & Moustaki, I. (2001). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 347-387.
10. Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2005). Further empirical results on parametric vs. nonparametric IRT modeling of Likert-type personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 261-279.
11. n contingency tables: A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 1009-1020.
12. McCrae, R.R., Zonderman, A.B., Costa, P.T. Jr., Bond, M.H., & Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-565.
13. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2006). Mplus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
14. Peterson, C (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44-55.
15. Quilty, L.C., Oakman, J.M., & Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99-117.
16. Rauch, W., Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2006, July). Methodological approaches to the problem of dimensionality of optimism questionnaires. EAM-SMABS Conference in Budapest, Hungary.
17. Rauch, W.A., Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597-1607.
18. Roberts, J.S., Donoghue, J.R., & Laughlin, J.E. (2000). A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 3-32.
19. Roberts, J.S., Laughlin, J.E., & Wedell, D.H. (1996). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211-233.
20. Robinson-Whelen, S., Kim, C., MacCallum, R.C., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (1997). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism in older adults: Is it more important to be optimistic or not to be pessimistic? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1345-1353.
21. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph No. 17.
22. Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.
23. Scheier, M.F., Carver, C.S., & Bridges, M.W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063-1078.
24. Schweizer, K., & Koch, W. (2001). The assessment of components of optimism by POSO-E. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 563-574.
25. Schweizer, K., Schneider, R., & Beck-Seyffer, A. (2001). Personaler und sozialer Optimismus [Personal and social optimism]. Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 13-24.
26. Stark, S. (2001). MODFIT: A computer program for model-data fit. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://work.psych.uiuc.edu/irt.
27. Vautier, S., Raufaste, E., & Cariou, M. (2003). Dimensionality of the revised Life Orientation Test and the status of filler items. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 390-400.
28. Vermunt, J.K. (1997). LEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg: Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University.
29. Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Wieland-Eckelmann, R., & Carver, C.S. (1990). Dispositionelle Bewältigungsstile, Optimismus und Bewältigung: Ein internationaler Vergleich [Dispositional coping styles, optimism, and copying: An international comparison]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 11, 167-184.