Transport of atmospheric fine particulate matter: Part 1 - Findings from recent field programs on the extent of regional transport within North America

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 254-264

  Allen, David T ^a   Turner, Jay R ^b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOLS; AIR QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEATION; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); SULFUR DIOXIDE;

CONCEPTUAL MODELS; LENGTH SCALES; NORTH AMERICA; PARTICULATE MATTER;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY;

NITRATE; SULFATE; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

AEROSOL; AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORRELATION ANALYSIS; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; URBAN AREA;

EID: 39449126565     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.254     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Turner, J.R.; Allen, D.T. Transport of Atmospheric Fine Particulate Matter: Part 2 - Findings from Recent Field Programs on the Intraurban Variability in Fine Particulate Matter; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 2008, 58, 196-215.
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Background Information on the PM Supersite Program, 2000; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ amtic/supersites.html (accessed 2007).
3. McMurry, P.H.; Shepherd, M.F.; Vickery, J.S., Eds. Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: a NARSTO Assessment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2004.
4. McMurry, P.H.; Shepherd, M.F.; Vickery, J.S., Eds. Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2004; Section 10.7.
5. Liu, W.; Hopke, P.K.; Han, Y.; Yi, S.; Holsen, T.M.; Cybart, S.; Kozlowski, K.; Milligan, M. Application of Receptor Modeling to Atmospheric Constituents at Potsdam and Stockton, NY; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 4997-5007.
6. Paatero, P. Least Squares Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis; Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 1997, 37, 15-35.
7. Paatero, P.; Tapper, U. Analysis of Different Modes of Factor Analysis as Least Squares Fit Problems; Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Systems 1993, 18, 183-194.
8. Paatero, P.; Tapper, U. Positive Matrix Factorization: a Non-Negative Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values; Environmentrics 1994, 5, 111-126.
9. Gao, N.; Cheng, M.-D.; Hopke, P.K. Potential Source Contribution Function Analysis and Source Apportionment of Sulfur Species Measured at Rubidoux, CA during the Southern California Air Quality Study, 1987; Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 277, 369-380.
10. Dutkiewicz, V.A.; Qureshi, S.; Khana, A.R.; Ferraro, V.; Schwab, J;. Demerjian, K.; Husain, L. Sources of Fine Particulate Sulfate in New York; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3179-3189.
11. 2.5 in Metropolitan New York City; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S312-S332.
12. 2.5 Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S333-S346.
13. 2.5 Aerosols in Queens, New York: Evaluation of Sources of Fine-Particle Mass; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S347-S359.
14. 2.5 Chemical Species and Source-Apportioned Mass Concentrations in New York City; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 5269-5282.
15. 2.5 in Pittsburgh; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 952-961.
16. 2.5 in Pittsburgh Using PMF and UNMIX; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 910-924.
17. 2.5 during a 2001 Summer Intensive Study at the NETL Pittsburgh Site Using PMF2 and EPA UNMIX; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 925-940.
18. Modey, W.K.; Eatough, D.J.; Anderson, R.R.; Martello, V.; Takahama, S.; Lucas, L.J.; Davidson, C.I. Ambient Fine Particulate Concentrations and Chemical Composition at Two Sampling Sites in Metropolitan Pittsburgh: a 2001 Intensive Summer Study; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3165-3178.
19. Stanier, C.O.; Khlystov, A.Y.; Pandis, S.N. Nucleation Events during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Description and Relation to Key Meteorological, Gas Phase, and Aerosol Parameters; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 253-264.
20. Shi, Q. Aerosol Size Distributions (3 nm to 2 μm) Measured at the St. Louis Supersite (4/1/01-4/30/02); M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, August 2003.
21. Ogulei, D.; Hopke, P.K.; Zhou, L.; Pancras, J.P.; Nain, N.; Ondov, J.M. Source Apportionment of Baltimore Aerosol from Combined Size Distribution and Chemical Composition Data; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S396-S410.
22. 2.5 and Its Constituents for Resolution of Sources and Immune Responses; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S224-S237.
23. McMurry, P.H.; Shepherd, M.F.; Vickery, J.S., Eds. Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: a NARSTO Assessment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2004; Section 10.6.
24. 14C Measurements; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 133-139.
25. 2.5 Ambient Aerosol in Nashville, TN; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 6053-6061.
26. Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Russell, A.; Edgerton, E.S. Atmospheric Aerosol over Two Urban-Rural Pairs in the Southeastern United States: Chemical Composition and Possible Source; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 4453-4470.
27. Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Russell, A.; Edgerton, E.S. Enhanced Source Identification of Southeast Aerosols Using Temperature Resolved Carbon Fractions and Gas-Phase Components; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S445-S466.
28. 2.5 in the Southeastern United States Using Receptor and Emissions-Based Models: Conceptual Differences and Implications for Time-Series Health Studies; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 2533-2551.
29. Allen, D.T.; Fraser, M.P. An Overview of the Gulf Coast Aerosol Research and Characterization Study the Houston Fine Particulate Matter Supersite; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 456-466.
30. 2.5 Mass and Composition in Southeast Texas; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 14-26.
31. HYSPLLT4 (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model. 1997; available from NOAA Air Resources Laboratory at http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html (accessed 2007).
32. McGaughey, G.; Durrenberger, C.; McDonald-Buller, E.; Allen, D.T. Back-Trajectory Analyses on High and Low Ozone Days for the Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/Galveston/Brazoria Ozone Nonattainment Areas for the Years 2001 through 2005; University of Texas Center for Energy and Environmental Resources: Austin, TX, 2006.
33. Buzcu, B.; Yue, Z.W.; Fraser, M.P.; Nopmongcol, U.; Allen, D.T. Secondary Particle Formation and Evidence of Heterogeneous Chemistry during a Wood Smoke Episode in Texas; J. Geophys. Res. 2006, doi: 10.1029/ 2005JD006143.
34. Junquera, V.; Russell, M.M.; Vizuete, W.; Kimura, Y.; Allen, D.T. Wildfires in Eastern Texas in August and September 2000: Emissions and Impact on Photochemistry; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 4983-4996.
35. Nopmongcol, U.; Allen, D.T. Modeling of Surface Reactions on Carbonaceous Atmospheric Particles during a Wood Smoke Episode in Houston, Texas; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S524-S537.
36. Ikegami, M.; Okada, K.; Zaizen, Y.; Makino, Y.; Jensen, J.B.; Gras, J.L.; Harjano, H. Very High Weight Ratios of S/K in Individual Haze Particles over Kalimantan during the 1997 Indonesian Forest Fires; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 4237-4243.
37. Nopmongcol, U.; Khamwichit, W.; Fraser, M.P;. Allen. D.T. Modeling Heterogeneous Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol during a Wood Smoke Episode in Houston, Texas; Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 3057-3070.
38. Brock, C.A.; Trainer, M.; Ryerson, T.B.; Neuman, J.A.; Parrish, D.D.; Holloway, J.S.; Nicks, D.K.; Frost, G.J.; Hubler, G.; Fehsenfeld, F.C.; Wilson, J.C.; Reeves, J.M.; Lafleur, B.G.; Hubert, H.; Atlas, E.L.; Donnelly, S.G.; Schauffler, S.M.; Stroud, V.R.; Wiedinmyer, C. Particle Growth in Urban and Industrial Plumes in Texas; J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D3), 4111, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002746.
39. Russell, M.M.; Allen, D.T. Predicting Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Rates in Southeast Texas; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2005, 110, do7s17; doi: 10.1029/2004JD004722.
40. 2.5 in St. Louis, MO Using Speciation Trends Network Data; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, S360-S377.
41. 2.5 in Urban and Rural Areas. Research Triangle Park and Washington, DC. Personal communication, 2006.
42. 2.5 Climatology at a Rural Midwest Site. In: Regional and Global Perspectives on Haze: Causes, Consequences and Controversies - Visibility Specialty Conference, Air & Waste Management Association, Asheville, NC, October 25-29, 2004; Paper 78.
43. 2.5 at the St. Louis-Midwest Supersite; J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, D10S10.
44. 2.5 Mass Apportionment for St. Louis; M.S. Thesis, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 2006.
45. Jaeckels, J.M.; Bae, M.S.; Schauer, J.J. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) Analysis of Molecular Marker Measurements to Quantify the Sources of Organic Aerosols. In Proceedings of the 99th Annual Meeting of A&WMA, New Orleans, LA, June 20-23, 2006; Paper No. 1009.
46. Kulmala, M.; Vehkamäki, H.; Petäjä, T.; Dal Maso, M.; Lauri, A.; Kerminen, V.-M.; Birmili, W.; McMurry, P.H. Formation and Growth Rates of Ultrafine Atmospheric Particles: a Review of Observations; J. Aerosol Sci. 2004, 35, 143-176.
47. McMurry, P.H.; Shepherd, M.F.; Vickery, J.S., Eds. Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: a NARSTO Assessment; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2004, Section 10.3.
48. 2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS); J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, D10S04.
49. 2.5 Associated Organic Compounds in Central California; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 290-303.
50. Herner, J.D.; Ying, Q.; Aw, J.; Gao, O.; Chang, D.P.Y.; Kleeman, M.J. Dominant Mechanisms that Shape the Airborne Particle Size and Composition Distribution in Central California; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 827-844.
51. Turkiewicz, K.; Magliano, K.; Najita, T. Comparison of Two Winter Air Quality Episodes during the California Regional Particulate Air Quality Study; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 467-473.
52. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Park, K.; Lowenthal, D.H. Nanoparticle and Ultrafine Particle Events at the Fresno Supersite; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 417-430.
53. 2.5 in Urban and Rural Areas, National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report. In A&WMA Air Quality Measurements Conference, November 13-15, 2002, Session 1, Paper 9.
54. Begum, B.A.; Kim, E.; Jeong, C.-H.; Lee, D.-W.; Hopke, P.K. Evaluation of the Potential Source Contribution Function Using the 2002 Quebec-Forest Fire Episode; Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 3719-3724.
55. Mendoza, A., M.; Garcia, R.; Vela, P.; Lozaro, F.; Allen, D.T. Trace Gases and Particulate Matter Emissions from Wildfires and Agricultural Burning in Northeast Mexico during the 2000 Fire Season; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55, 1797-1808.