Application of PSCF and CPF to PMF-modeled sources of PM2.5 in Pittsburgh

Aerosol Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 952-961

  Pekney, Natalie ^a   Davidson, Cliff ^b   Zhou, Liming ^c   Hopke, Philip ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Clarkson University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; COMBUSTION; COMPOSITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PROBABILITY;

POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION (PMF); POTENTIAL SOURCE CONTRIBUTION FUNCTION (PSCF); TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI); VEHICLE EMISSIONS;

AIR POLLUTION;

CADMIUM; GALLIUM; IRON; LEAD; MANGANESE; NITRATE; SELENIUM; STEEL; SULFATE; ZINC;

COMBUSTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; COOKING; DATA BASE; DETRITUS; DUST; EXHAUST GAS; EXPECTATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; INFORMATION; LATITUDE; LONGITUDE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; WOOD;

EID: 33745852808     PISSN: 02786826     EISSN: 15217388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02786820500543324     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ashbaugh, L., Malm, W., and Sadeh, W. (1985). A Residence Time Probability Analysis of Sulfur Concentrations at Ground Canyon National Park, Atmos. Environ. 19(8):1263-1270.
2. Cabada, J. C., Khlystov, A., Wittig, E., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S. (2004). Light Scattering by Fine Particles During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Measurements and Modeling, J. Geophys. Res. 109:D16S03.
3. Carter, J. D., Ghio, A. J., Samet, J. M., and Devlin, R. B. (1997). Cytokine Production by Human Airway Epithelial Cells After Exposure to an Air Pollution Particle Is Metal-Dependent, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 146:180-188.
4. Draxler, R. R. (1999). HYSPLIT_4 User's Guide, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL ARL-230, Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.
5. Malm, W. C., Johnson, C. E., and Bresch, J. F. (1986). Application of Principal Component Analysis for Purposes of Identifying Source-Receptor Relationships. In Receptor Methods for Source Apportionment (edited by T. G. Pace), Publication TR-5. Air Pollution Control Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
6. 10-2.5) in Outdoor and Indoor Air, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 155:245-252.
7. Lee, J. H., Yoshida, Y., Turpin, B., Hopke, et al. (2002). Identification of Sources Contributing to Mid-Atlantic Regional Aerosol, J. Air and Waste Manag. Assoc. 52:1186-1205.
8. Liu, W., Hopke, P., Han, Y., Yi, S., et al. (2003). Appliation of Receptor Modeling to Atmospheric Constituents at Potsdam and Stockton. NY, Atmos. Environ. 37:4997-5007.
9. NIOSH. (1996). Elemental Carbon (Diesel Exhaust). In: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH.
10. Paatero, P. and Tapper, U. (1993). Analysis of Different Modes of Factor Analysis as Least Square Fit Problems, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 18:183-194.
11. Paatero, P. and Tapper, U. (1994). Positive Matrix Factorization: A Non-Negative Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values, Environmetrics 5:111-126.
12. Paatero, P. (1997). Least Squares Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor Analysis, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 37:15-35.
13. 2.5 in Pittsburgh using PMF and Unmix, Aerosol Sci. Technol. in press.
14. Pekney, N., Davidson, C., Bein, K., Wexler, A., and Johnston, M. (2005b). Identification of Sources of Atmospheric PM at the Pittsburgh Supersite Part I: Single Particle Analysis and Filter-Based Positive Matrix Factorization, Atmos. Environ. in press.
15. Pekney, N. and Davidson, C. I. (2005). Determination of Trace Elements in Ambient Aerosol Samples, Analytica Chimica Acta. 540:269-277.
16. Polidori, A., Turpin, B., Lim, H., Totten, L., and Davidson, C. (2005). Polarity and Molecular Weight/Carbon Weight of the Pittsburgh Organic Aerosol. Manuscript in preparation.
17. Polissar, A., Hopke, P., and Poirot, R. (2001). Atmospheric Aerosol over Vermont: Chemical Composition and Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:4604-4621.
18. 2.5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Atmos. Environ. 38:3305-3318.
19. Schauer, J. J., Rogge, W. F., Hildermann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., and Cass, G. R. (1996). Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter using Organic Compounds as Tracers, Atmos. Environ. 30:3837-3855.
20. Simoneit, B. R. T. (1989). Organic Matter of the Troposphere. 5. Application of Molecular Marker Analysis to Biogenic Emissions into the Troposphere for Source Reconciliations, J. Atmos. Chem. 8:251-275.
21. Simoneit, B. R. T., Rogge, W. F., Mazurek, M. A., Standley, L. J., Hildemann, L. M., and Cass, G. R. (1993). Lignin Pyrolosis Products, Lignans, and Resin Acids as Specific Tracers of Plant Classes in Emissions from Biomass Combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:2533-2541.
22. Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R. et al. (1999). Levoglucosan, A Tracer for Cellulose in Biomasa Burning and Atmospheric Particles, Atmos. Environ. 33:173-182.
23. Takahama, S., Wittig, B., Vayenas, D., and Davidson, C. I. et al. (2004). Modeling the Diurnal Variation of Nitrate During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study, J. Geophys. Res. - Atmos. 109(D16):Art. No. D16S06.
24. 2.5 During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38(2):80-90.
25. 2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 35:602-610.
26. U.S. EPA. (1999). AirData Website (www.epa.gov/air/data/index.html). 1999 data used, accessed 2004.
27. U.S. EPA. (2002). 2002 TRI Data Release, www.epa.gov/tri. Accessed 2004.
28. 2.5 Chemical Source Profiles for Vehicle Exhaust, Vegetative Burning, Geological Material, and Coal Burning in Northwestern Colorado During 1995, Chemosphere 43:1141-1151.
29. Wittig, A.E., Anderson, N. J., Khlystov, A. Y., Pandis, S. N. et al. (2004). Pittsburgh Air Quality Study overview, Atmos. Environ. 38:3170-3125.