A capacity available-to-promise model for drum-buffer-rope systems

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2255-2274

  Wu, H H ^a   Liu, J Y ^a  

^a CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Available to promise (ATP); Capable to promise (CTP); Capacity available to promise (CATP); Drum buffer rope (DBR); Due date assignment; Order promising

Indexed keywords

INVENTORY CONTROL; MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; SCHEDULING;

AVAILABLE-TO-PROMISE (ATP); CAPABLE-TO-PROMISE (CTP); CAPACITY AVAILABLE-TO-PROMISE (CATP); DRUM-BUFFER-ROPE (DBR); DUE-DATE ASSIGNMENT; ORDER PROMISING;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

EID: 39449115349     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540601039783     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Atwater, J.B. and Chakravorty, S.S., A study of the utilisation of capacity constrained resources in drum-buffer-rope systems. Prod. Oper. Manage., 2002, 11(2), 259-273.
2. Cheng, T.C.E. and Gupta, M.C., Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions. Euro. J. Oper. Res., 1989, 38, 156-166.
3. Corbett, T. and Csillag, J.M., Analysis of the effects of seven drum-buffer-rope implementations. Prod. Invent. Manage. J., 2001, 3rd/4th quarter, 17-23.
4. Goldratt, E.M. and Cox, J., The Goal, 1986 (North River: Croton-on-Hudson).
5. Goldratt, E.M. and Fox, R.E., The Race, 1986 (North River: Croton-on-Hudson).
6. Goldratt, E.M., The Haystack Syndrome, 1990 (North River: Croton-on-Hudson).
7. Gordon, V., Proth, J.M. and Chu, C., A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research. Euro. J. Oper. Res., 2002, 139, 1-25.
8. Scheduling with priority dispatching rules and drum-buffer-rope in a recoverable manufacturing system. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1997, 53, 101-116.
9. Jeong, B., Sim, S.B., Jeong, H.S. and Kim, S.W., An available-to-promise system for TFT LCD manufacturing in supply chain. Comput. Indust. Eng., 2002, 43, 191-212.
10. Johnson, G.A. and Malucci, L., Available vs. capable-to-promise. APICS-The Perform. Adv., 2000, May, 22.
11. Moses, S., Grant, H., Gruenwald, L. and Pulat, S., Real-time due-date promising by buildto-order environments. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2004, 42(20), 4353-4375.
12. Muzumdar, M. and Deise, C., Available, capable, profitable. APICS-The Perform. Adv., 2003, February, 55-58.
13. Sadowski, R., Ready, willing, and capable. APICS-The Perform. Adv., 2000, May, 43-46.
14. Schragenheim, E. and Ronen, B., Drum-buffer-rope shop floor control. Prod. Invent. Manage. J., 1990, 3rd quarter, 18-23.
15. Schragenheim, E. and Ronen, B., Buffer management: a diagnostic tool for production control, Prod. Invent. Manage. J., 1991, 2nd quarter, 74-79.
16. Smith, M.L. and Seidmann, A., Due date selection procedures for job-shop simulation. Comput. Indust. Eng., 1983, 7(3), 199-207.
17. Spencer, M.S. and Cox III, J.F., Master production scheduling development in a theory of constraints environment. Prod. Invent. Manage. J., 1995, 1st quarter, 8-14.
18. Taylor, S.G. and Plenert, G.J., Finite capacity promise. Prod. Invent. Manage. J., 1999, 3rd quarter, 50-56.
19. Veeramani, D. and Joshi, P., Methodologies for rapid and effective response to requests for quotation (RFQs). IIE Trans., 1997, 29, 825-838.
20. Vig, M.M. and Dooley, K.J., Mixing static and dynamic flowtime estimates for due-date assignment. J. Oper. Manage., 1993, 11, 67-79.
21. Vollmann, T.E., Berry, W.L. and Whybark, D.C., Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems, 4th ed., 1997 (Irwin/McGraw-Hill: New York, NY).
22. Wu, H.H., Lee, C.J. and Yang, C.J., A robust DBR management system, in Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 10-12 August 2005, pp. 230-235.