Optimizing imaging techniques in the postoperative patient

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 261-272

  Buckwalter, Kenneth A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; Computed tomography (CT); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Neoplasm; Orthopedic prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; COBALT CHROME; METAL; OXIDIZED ZIRCONIUM; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURGICAL PATIENT; THICKNESS;

ARTIFACTS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METALS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 39449088140     PISSN: 10897860     EISSN: 1098898X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038315     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(3):156-161
2. Buckwalter KA, Parr JA, Choplin RH, Capello WN. Multichannel CT imaging of orthopedic hardware and implants. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006;10(1):86-97
3. White LM, Buckwalter KA. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskel Radiol 2002;6(1):5-17
4. Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK, Magid D, Walker PS. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12(2):236-241
5. Flohr TG, Stierstorfer K, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H, Primak AN, McCollough CH. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys 2005;32(8):2536-2547
6. Clarke IC, Manaka M, Green DD, et al. Current status of zirconia used in total hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):73-84
7. Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177(2):285-287
8. Defrise M, Noo F, Kudo H. Rebinning-based algorithms for helical cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 2001;46(11):2911-2937
9. Kachelriess M, Fuchs T, Schaller S, Kalender WA. Advanced single-slice rebinning for tilted spiral cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2001;28(6):1033-1041
10. Harris CA, White LM. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Orthop Clin North Am 2006;37(3):349-359
11. Raphael B, Haims AH, Wu JS, Katz LD, White LM, Lynch K. MRI comparison of periprosthetic structures around zirconium knee prostheses and cobalt chrome prostheses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(6):1771-1777
12. Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS, Tam V, Delamarter RB. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine 1998;23(15):1684-1688
13. Wintersperger BJ, Runge VM, Biswas J, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling. Invest Radiol 2006;41(7):586-592
14. Ramos-Cabrer P, van Duynhoven JP, Van der Toorn A, Nicolay K. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22(8):1097-1103