The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-orientated Occupational Therapy Assessment: A Rasch analysis of its domains

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-32

  Wirtz, Markus A ^a   Voigt Radloff, Sebastian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Differential item functioning; ICF; Occupational therapy; Rasch analysis

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING;

DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING; PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS; RASCH ANALYSIS; THERAPY PLANNING;

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RASCH ANALYSIS; SELF CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRICS;

EID: 39349108898     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f4523c     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrich D (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43:561-573.
2. Birbeck GL, Kim S, Hays RD, Vickrey BG (2000). Quality of life measures in epilepsy: how well can we detect change over time? Neurology 54:1822-1827.
3. Bond TG, Fox CM (2001). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
4. Béguin H, Dreier S, Nieuwesteeg M, Mosthaf U, Schüpbach H, Somazzi M, et al. (1995). The Bieler model - a model to develop and evaluate occupational treatments [in German]. Ergotherapie (CH) 9:21-29.
5. Chapparo C, Ranka J (1997). The occupational performance model (Australia): a description of constructs and structure. In: Chapparo C, Ranka J, editors. OPM occupational performance model, monograph 1. Lidcombe: Occupational Performance Network. pp. 1-23.
6. Cup EHC, Scholte op Reimer WJM, Thijssen MCE, van Kuyk-Minis MAH (2003). Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 17:402-409.
7. de Langen EG, Frommelt P, Wiedmann KD, Amann J (1995). Measuring functional independence in rehabilitation using the functional independence measure (FIM) [in German]. Rehabilitation 34:IV-XI.
8. Embretson SE, Reise SP (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
9. Fisher AG (1993). The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 47:319-329.
10. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2:i-iv, 1-74.
11. Gauggel S, Heinemann AW, Böcker M, Lämmler G, Borchelt M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E (2004). Patient-staff agreement in the Barthel Index at admission and discharge in a sample of elderly stroke patients. Rehabil Psychol 49:21-27.
12. Heinemann AW(2005). Putting outcome measurement in context: a rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabil Psychol 50:6-14.
13. Heinemann AW, Sokol K, Garvin L, Bode RK (2002). Measuring unmet needs and services among persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1052-1059.
14. Heiss HW, Voigt-Radloff S, Schochat T (2003). Occupational therapy assessment (OTA): validity and reliability for adults of various ages. Eur J Geriatr 5:23-29.
15. Holland PW, Wainer H (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
16. Iwata N, Turner RJ, Lloyd DA (2002). Race/ethnicity and depressive symptoms in community-dwelling young adults: a differential item functioning analysis. Psychiatry Res 110:281-289.
17. Kielhofner G (1997). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
18. Kiesinger A, Voigt-Radloff S (1996). The Occupational Therapy Assessment [in German]. Ergother Rehabil 7:647-651.
19. Lai JS, Cella D, Chang CH, Bode RK, Heinemann AW (2003). Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue. Qual Life Res 12:485-501.
20. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1994). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy Publications ACE.
21. Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Steward D, Rigby P, Letts L (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther 63:9-23.
22. Law M, Baum C, Dunn W (2001.) Measuring occupational performance. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated.
23. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969). Assessment of older people, selfmaintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179-186.
24. Linacre JM, Wright BD (1999). WINSTEPS for PC compatibles. Chicago: Mesa Press.
25. Mahony FI, Barthel DW (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61-65.
26. McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware JE (1997). Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (Pf-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol 50:451-461.
27. Orlando M, Marshall GN (2002). Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD checklist: detection and evaluation of impact. Psychol Assess 14:50-59.
28. Reed KL, Sanderson SR (1992). Concepts of occupational therapy. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
29. Schafer J. Multiple imputation, 2003 [cited 2006 May 3]. Available at: URL: http://www.stat.psu.edu/%7Ejls/misoftwa.html.
30. Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7:147-177.
31. Schochat T, Voigt-Radloff S, Heiss HW (2002). Psychometric analyses of the Occupational Therapy Assessment [in German]. Gesundheitswesen 64:343-352.
32. Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, Grimby G, Thonnard JL, Slade A, et al. (2004). Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care 42:I37-I48.
33. Velozo CA, Kielhofner G, Lai JS (1998). The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. Am J Occup Ther 53:83-90.
34. Voigt-Radloff S, Schochat T (2002). The occupational therapy assessment: theory, psychometric properties, quality management and outcome research. Ergother - J Appl Sci 3:49-57.
35. Voigt-Radloff S, Schochat T, Heiss HW (2000). Das ergotherapeutische assessment: Feldstudie zu Akzeptanz, Praktikabilität und Prozessqualität. Rehabilitation 39:255-261.
36. WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
37. Wilcock A (1993). A theory of the human need for occupation. J Sci Occup Aust 1:17-24.
38. Wirtz M, Farin E, Bengel J, Jäckel W, Hämmerer D, Gerdes K (2005). IRES-24 patientenfragebogen: entwicklung der kurzform eines assessmentinstrumentes in der rehabilitation mittels der Mixed-Rasch-Analyse. Diagnostica 51:75-87.
39. Wright BD, Linacre JM (1989). Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:857-860.
40. Wright BD, Linacre JM (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 8:370.
41. Wright BD, Panchapakesan N (1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 29:23-48.
42. Wright BD, Stone MH (2004). Making measures. Chicago: Phaneron Press.