On the expressive power of Live Sequence Charts

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4444 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 225-246

  Damm, Werner ^a   Toben, Tobe ^a   Westphal, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES;

EXPRESSIVE POWER; LIVE SEQUENCE CHARTS; MESSAGE SEQUENCE CHARTS (MSC); SYNTACTICALLY CHARACTERISED FRAGMENT;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 39149111284     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71322-7_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Damm, W., Harel, D.: LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts. Formal Methods in System Design 19 (2001) 45-80
2. Harel, D., Marelly, R.: Come, Let's Play: Scenario-Based Programming Using LSCs and the Play-Engine. Springer (2003)
3. Klose, J.: Live Sequence Charts: A Graphical Formalism for the Specification of Communication Behavior. PhD thesis, C. v. O. Universität Oldenburg (2003)
4. Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., Haumer, P.: Scenarios in system development: Current practice. IEEE Software 15 (1998) 34-45
5. Amyot, D., Eberlein, A.: An evaluation of scenario notations and construction approaches for telecommunication systems development. Telecommunications Systems Journal 24 (2003) 61-94
6. Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: ICSE'99. Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, CA, USA., ACM (1999) 411-420
7. Bitsch, F.: Safety patterns - the key to formal specification of safety requirements. In Voges, U., ed.: Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, 20th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2001, Budapest, Hungary, September 26-28, 2001, Proceedings. Volume 2187 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer (2001) 176-190
8. ITU-T: ITU-T Rec. Z.120: Message Sequence Chart (MSC). ITU-T, Geneva (1999)
9. Knieke, C., Huhn, M., Goltz, U.: Modelling and simulation of an automotive system using LSCs. In Houmb, S.H., Jürjens, J., eds.: Proc. CSDUML'2005, TUM (2005) 0-0 TUM-TR.
10. Combes, P., Harel, D., Kugler, H.: Modeling and verification of a telecommunication application using Live Sequence Charts and the Play-Engine tool. In: Proc. ATVA 2005. Number 3707 in LNCS (2005)
11. Bunker, A., Gopalakrishnan, G., Slind, K.: Live Sequence Charts applied to hardware requirements specification and verification: A VCI bus interface model. Software Tools for Technology Transfer 7 (2004) 341-350
12. Bontemps, Y., Heymans, P., Kugler, H.: Applying LSCs to the specification of an air traffic control system. In: Proc. SCESM'03. (2003)
13. Bohn, J., Damm, W., Wittke, H., Klose, J., Moik, A.: Modelling and validating train system applications using statemate and live sequence charts. In: Proc. IDPT 2002, Society for Design and Process Science (2002)
14. Bontemps, Y.: Relating Inter-Agent and Intra-Agent Specifications. PhD thesis, University of Namur (Belgium) (2005)
15. Kugler, H., Harel, D., Pnueli, A., Lu, Y., Bontemps, Y.: Temporal logic for scenariobased specifications. In Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D., eds.: Proc. TACAS 2005. Volume 3440 of LNCS. (2005)
16. Klose, J., Toben, T., Westphal, B., Wittke, H.: Check it out: On the efficient formal verification of Live Sequence Charts. In Ball, T., Jones, R.B., eds.: Proc. CAV 2006. Volume 4144 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer-Verlag (2006) 219-233
17. Schinz, I., Toben, T., Mrugalla, C., Westphal, B.: The Rhapsody UML Verification Environment. In Cuellar, J.R., Liu, Z., eds.: Proc. SEFM 2004. (2004) 174-183
18. Klose, J., Wittke, H.: An automata based interpretation of Live Sequence Charts. In Margaria, T., Yi, W., eds.: Proc. TACAS 2001. Number 2031 in LNCS (2001) 512-527
19. Schlör, R.C.: Symbolic Timing Diagrams: A Visual Formalism for Model Verification. PhD thesis, C. v. O. Universität Oldenburg (2000)
20. Maidl, M.: The common fragment of ctl and ltl. In: IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. (2000) 643-652
21. Westphal, B., Toben, T.: The good, the bad and the ugly: Well-formedness of Live Sequence Charts. In Baresi, L., Heckel, R., eds.: Proc. FASE 2006. Volume 3922 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer-Verlag (2006) 230-246
22. Feyerabend, K., Josko, B.: A visual formalism for real time requirement specification. In Bertran, M., Rus, T., eds.: Proc. ARTS'97. Volume 1231 of LNCS. (1997) 158-168
23. Klose, J., Westphal, B.: Relating LSC specifications to UML models. In Ehrig, H., Grosse-Rhode, M., eds.: Proc. INT'02. (2002)
24. Damm, W., Westphal, B.: Live and let die: LSC-based verification of UML-models. Science of of Computer Programming 55 (2005) 117-159
25. Barnat, J.: Distributed Memory LTL Model Checking. PhD thesis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Brno (2004)
26. Harel, D.: personal communication (2005)
27. Toben, T., Westphal, B.: On the expressive power of LSCs. In Wiedermann, J., Tel, G., Pokorný, J., Bieliková, M., Štuller, J., eds.: Proc. SofSem 2006. Volume 2., Institute of Computer Science AS CR, Prague (2006) 33-43