Evidence for flow-parsing in radial flow displays

Vision Research

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 655-663

  Warren, Paul A ^a   Rushton, Simon K ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Motion processing; Object movement; Optic flow; Psychophysics; Self movement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL REFLEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 39149109909     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bussetini C., Masson G.S., and Miles F.A. Radial optic flow induces vergence eye movements with ultra-short latencies. Nature 390 (1997) 512-515
2. Duncker K. Über induzierte Bewegung. Psychologische Forschung 12 (1929) 180-259
3. Duffy C.J., and Wurtz R.H. An illusory transformation of optic flow fields. Vision Research 33 (1993) 1481-1490
4. Gibson J.J. Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology 49 (1958) 182-194
5. Gibson J.J. The perception of the visual world (1950), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
6. Heckmann T., and Howard I.P. Induced motion: Isolation and dissociation of egocentric and vection-entrained components. Perception 20 (1991) 285-305
7. Heeger D.J., and Jepson A.D. Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion I: Algorithm and implementation. International Journal of Computer Vision 7 (1992) 95-117
8. Hildreth E.C. Recovering observer heading from visual motion with self-moving objects. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B 337 (1992) 305-313
9. Howard I.P., and Childerson L. The contribution of motion, the visual frame and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt. Perception 23 (1994) 753-762
10. Johansson G. Vector analysis in visual perception of rolling motion. A quantitative approach. Psychologische Forschung 36 (1974) 311-319
11. Lappe M., Bremmer F., and van den Berg A.V. Perception of self-motion from visual flow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 328-336
12. Lappe M., and Rauschecker J.P. Computation of heading direction from optic flow in visual cortex. In: Giles C.L., Hanson S.J., and Cowan J.D. (Eds). Adxvxances in neural information processing systems Vol. 5 (1993), Morgan Kaufmann 433-440
13. Lappe M., and Rauschecker J.P. An illusory transformation in a model of optic flow processing. Vision Research 35 (1995) 1619-1631
14. Lee D.N., and Aronson E. Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Perception and Psychophysics 5 (1974) 529-532
15. Lepecq J.C., Jouen F., and Dubon D. The effect of linear vection on manual aiming at memorized directions of stationary targets. Perception 22 (1993) 49-60
16. Longuet-Higgins H.C., and Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 208 (1980) 385-397
17. McLeod P., Driver J., and Crisp J. Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature 320 (1988) 154-155
18. Meese T.S., Smith V., and Harris M.G. Induced motion may account for the illusory transformation of optic flow fields found by Duffy and Wurtz. Vision Research 35 (1994) 981-984
19. Miles F.A. Visual stabilisation of the eyes in primates. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 7 (1997) 867-871
20. Mollon J. "..on the basis of velocity cues alone": Some perceptual themes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A (1997) 859-878
21. Murakami I. Motion-transparent inducers have different effects on induced motion and motion capture. Vision Research 39 (1999) 1671-1681
22. Murakami I., and Shimojo S. Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrasts, smaller eccentricities, and larger inducer sizes. Vision Research 33 (1993) 2091-2107
23. Nakayama K., and Loomis J.M. Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception 3 (1974) 63-80
24. Nawrot M., and Sekuler R. Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: Explorations in cooperativity. Vision Research 30 (1990) 1439-1451
25. Perrone J.A. Model for the computation of self motion in biological systems. Journal of the Optical Society of America 9 (1992) 177-194
26. Perrone J.A., and Stone L.S. A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex. Vision Research 34 (1994) 2917-2938
27. Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 57-71
28. Rieger J.H., and Lawton D.T. Processing differential image motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 (1985) 354-359
29. Royden C.S. Mathematical analysis of motion-opponent mechanisms used in the determination of heading and depth. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 14 (1997) 2128-2143
30. Royden C.S., and Conti D.M. A model using MY like motion-opponent operators explains an illusory transformation in the optic flow field. Vision Research 43 (2003) 2811-2826
31. Rushton S.K., Harris J.M., Lloyd M.R., and Wann J.P. Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Current Biology 8 (1998) 1191-1194
32. Rushton S.K., and Warren P.A. Moving observers, 3D relative motion and the detection of object movement. Current Biology 15 (2005) R542-R543
33. Rushton S.K., Bradshaw M., and Warren P.A. The pop out of scene relative object movement against retinal motion due to self-movement. Cognition 105 (2007) 237-245 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.004
34. Warren P.A., and Rushton S.K. Optic flow and the induced motion illusion. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 893a
35. Warren P.A., and Rushton S.K. Perception of object trajectory: Parsing retinal motion into self and object movement components. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-11 10.1167/7.11.2
36. Wexler M., Lamouret I., and Droulez J. The stationarity hypothesis: An allocentric criterion in visual perception. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3023-3037
37. Whitney D.V., and Cavanagh P. Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 954-959
38. Zemel R.S., and Sejnowski T.J. A model for encoding multiple object motions and self-motion in area MST of primate visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 18 (1998) 531-547