Demystifying interdisciplinary qualitative research

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 307-331

  Greckhamer, Thomas ^a   Koro Ljungberg, Mirka ^b   Cilesiz, Sebnem ^c   Hayes, Sharon ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deconstruction; Disciplinarity; Interdisciplinarity; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149097545     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407312049     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. American Heritage college dictionary (3rd ed.). (2000). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Audi, R. (Ed.). (1995). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text (S. Heath, Trans.). London: Fontana.
6. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Bennington, G. (1999). Inter. In M. Mc Quillan, G. Mac Donald, R. Purves, & S. Thomson (Eds.), Post-theory: New directions in criticism (pp. 103-119). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
8. Berger, P.L., Berger, B., & Keller, H. (1973). The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. New York: Random House.
9. Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
10. Bloch, M. (2004). A discourse that disciplines, governs, and regulates: The national research council's report on scientific research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 96-110.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Burbules, N. (2004). Ways of thinking about educational quality. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 4-10.
14. Clemens, E., & Cook, J.M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. American Sociological Review, 25, 441-446.
15. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Derrida, J. (1997a). Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida/edited with a commentary by John D. Caputo. New York: Fordham University Press.
17. Derrida, J. (1997b). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
18. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
19. Elgin, C.Z. (1996). Considered judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
21. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon. (Original work published 1969)
22. Foucault, M. (1994). Power (Vol. 3). New York: New Press.
23. Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientization. Harvard Educational Review, 40 (3), 452-477.
25. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. ed.; M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
26. Gee, J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
27. Graham, P. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and evaluative meaning: Interdisciplinarity as a critical turn. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 110-129). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Gregorian, V. (2003, September 9). Higher education in an age of specialized knowledge: Jaroslav Pelikan lecture, Library of Congress. Retrieved September 16, 2006, from http://www.carnegie.org/sub/pubs/ speeches.html
29. Harry, B., Sturges, K., & Klingner, J. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3-13.
30. Hirst, P.S. (1973). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), Philosophy of education (pp. 87 - 101). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Hirst, P.H., & Peters, R.S. (1971). The logic of education. New York: Humanities Press.
32. Jameson, F. (1984). Foreword. In J.-F. Lyotard (Ed.), The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (pp. vii-xxi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Kant, I. (1979). The conflict of the faculties. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1798)
34. Kerlinger, F.N., & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
35. Kilduff, M. (1993). Deconstructing organizations. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 13-31.
36. Kincheloe, J.L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679-692.
37. Kincheloe, J.L. (2005). On the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323-350.
38. Klein, J.T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, & practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
39. Klein, J.T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. Sylvan (Eds.), Disciplinary ways of knowing (pp. 185-211). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
40. Klein, J.T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
41. Kockelmans, J.J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity and higher education (pp. 123-160). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
42. Kuhn, T.S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Ladd, E.C., & Lipset, S.M. (1975). The divided academy. Professors and politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Lincoln, Y. (2001). An emerging new bricoleur: Promises and possibilities-A reaction to Joe Kincheloe's "Describing the bricoleur." Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 693-695.
46. Lincoln, Y.S., & Denzin, N.K. (2005). Epilogue: The eighth and ninth moments-Qualitative research in/and the fractured future. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1115-1126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
48. Macey, D. (2000). The Penguin dictionary of critical theory. London: Penguin.
49. Mayo, P. (2004). Liberating praxis. Westport, CT: Praeger.
50. McGowan, J. (1991). Postmodernism and its critics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51. McLaren, P. (2001). Bricklayers and bricoleurs: A Marxist addendum. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 700-705.
52. Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
53. Miller, R.C. (1982). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues of Integrative Studies, 1, 1-37.
54. Oberschall, A. (1972). The sociological study of the history of social research. In A. Oberschall (Ed.), The establishment of empirical sociology (pp. 1-14). New York: Harper and Row.
55. Ollerenshaw, J.A., & Creswell, J.W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two approaches restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329-347.
56. Peters, M., & Burbules, N. (2004). Poststructuralism and educational research. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
57. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
58. Pinar, W.F. (2001). The researcher as bricoleur: The teacher as public intellectual. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 696-700.
59. Popkewitz, T. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual. London: Falmer.
60. Reis, R.M. (2000, September 29). Interdisciplinary research and your scientific career. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved September 17, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/2000/09/2000092903c.htm
61. Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. (1998). Learning in the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Salter, L., & Hearn, A. (1996). Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
63. Schutz, A. (2004). Rethinking domination and resistance: Challenging postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 15-23.
64. Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Simon, H.A. (1991). Models of my life. New York: Basic Books.
67. Spivak, G. (1997). Translator's preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans., pp. ix-lxxxvii). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
68. Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
69. Sutton, R.I., & Staw, B.M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.
70. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
71. Walker, H.A. (2004). Beyond power and domination: Legitimacy and formal organizations. In C. Johnson (Ed.), Legitimacy processes in organizations (pp. 239-271). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
72. Wallerstein, I. (2000). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press.
73. Webster's seventh new collegiate dictionary. (1967). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
74. Whetten, D.A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495.
75. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76. Wohl, R. (1955). Some observations on the social organization of interdisciplinary social science research. Social Forces, 33, 374-383.