Heterogeneous social preferences

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 65, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 436-457

  Erlei, Mathias ^a  

^a CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Heterogeneity; Inequity aversion; Reciprocity; Social preferences; Welfare Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149088311     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson S.P., Goeree J., and Holt Ch.A. The Logit equilibrium: a perspective on intuitive behavioral anomalies. Southern Economic Journal 69 (2002) 21-47
2. Andreoni J., and Miller J. Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70 (2002) 737-753
3. Bolton G., and Ockenfels A. A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review 100 (2000) 166-193
4. Charness G., and Rabin M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2002) 817-869
5. Dufwenberg M., and Kirchsteiger G. A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior 47 (2004) 268-298
6. Engelmann D., and Strobel M. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review 94 (2004) 857-869
7. Fehr E., and Schmidt K. A theory of fairness, competition and co-operation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999) 817-868
8. Fehr E., and Schmidt K.M. Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices. European Economic Review 44 (2000) 1057-1068
9. Fehr, E., Klein, A., Schmidt, K.M., 2004. Contracts, fairness, and incentives. Working Paper, University of Munich.
10. Fehr, E., Kremhelmer, S., Schmidt, K.M., 2005. Fairness and the optimal allocation of ownership rights. Working Paper, University of Munich.
11. Fudenberg D., and Levine D.K. The Theory of Learning in Games (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge
12. Goeree J., and Holt Ch.A. Ten little treasures of game theory and ten intuitive contradictions. American Economic Review 91 (2001) 1402-1422
13. Greene W. Econometric Analysis. fourth ed. (2000), Prentice Hall, London
14. Kagel J., and Wolfe K. Tests of fairness models based on equity considerations in a three-person ultimatum game. Experimental Economics 4 (2001) 203-220
15. McKelvey R.D., and Palfrey T.R. Quantile response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995) 6-38
16. McKelvey R.D., and Palfrey T.R. Quantal response equilibria in extensive form games. Experimental Economics 1 (1998) 9-41
17. Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83 (1993) 1281-1302
18. Selten R. Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 12 (1965) 301-324
19. Weibull J. Evolutionary Game Theory (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge and London