Analysis and interpretation of dynamic FDG PET oncological studies using data reduction techniques

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 6, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Pavlopoulos, Sotiris ^a   Thireou, Trias ^a   Kontaxakis, George ^b   Santos, Andres ^b  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUBED SUM COEFFICIENT SIMILARITY MEASURE; FEATURE CHARACTERIZATION; TRACER KINETIC METHOD;

DATA REDUCTION; EDGE DETECTION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; MAPPING; ONCOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; TRACER; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 39049169994     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-6-36     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sokoloff L Reivich M Kennedy C Des Rosiers MH Patlak CS Pettigrew KD Sakurada O Shinohara M The [14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: Theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat J Neurochem 1977, 28:897-916 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x 864466
2. Phelps ME Huang SC Hoffman EJ Selin C Sokoloff L Kuhl DE Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (18F)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: Validation of method Ann Neurol 1979, 6:371-388 10.1002/ana.410060502 117743
3. Riviere LE Basic principles and techniques of pharmacokinetic modeling J Zoo Wildl Med 1997, 28:3-19 9226611
4. Feng D Wong KP Wu CM Siu WC A technique for extracting physiological parameters and the required input function simultaneously from PET image measurements: Theory and simulation study IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1997, 1(4):243-254 10.1109/4233.681168 11020827
5. Bertoldo A Peltoniemi P Oikonen V Knuuti J Nuutila P Cobelli C Kinetic modeling of [18F]FDG in skeletal muscle by PET: A four-compartment five-rate-constant model Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001, 281:E524-E536 11500308
6. Guo H Renaut R Chen K Reiman E Clustering huge data sets for parametric PET imaging Biosystems 2003, 71(1-2):81-92 10.1016/S0303-2647(03)00112-6 14568209
7. Hotelling H Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components J Educ Psychol 1933, 24:417-441 10.1037/h0071325
8. Priestley M Rao T Tong H Applications of principal component analysis and factor analysis in the identification of multivariable systems IEEE Trans Autom Control 1974, 19(6):730-734 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100712
9. Jutten C Herault J Blind separation of sources, Part 1: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture Signal Processing New York: Elsevier Science 1991, 24
10. Tong L Liu R Soon VC Huang Y-F Indeterminacy and identifiability of blind identification IEEE Trans Circ Syst 1991, 38(5):499-509 10.1109/ 31.76486
11. Rogowska J Wolf GL Temporal correlation images derived from sequential MRI scans J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992, 16(5):784-788 10.1097/ 00004728-199209000-00021 1522274
12. Johnson RA Wichern DW Principal Components Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1998, 4:458-513
13. Rao CR The Use and Interpretation of Principal Component Analysis in Applied Research Sankhya 1964, 26:329-358
14. Moore B Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction IEEE Trans Autom Control 1981, 26(1):17-32 10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568
15. Andersen AH Gash DM Avison MJ Principal component analysis of the dynamic response measured by fMRI: A generalized linear systems framework Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 17(6):795-815 10.1016/ S0730-725X(99)00028-4 10402587
16. Barber DC The use of principal components in the quantitative analysis of gamma camera dynamic studies Phys Med Biol 1980, 25:283-292 10.1088/ 0031-9155/25/2/008 7384214
17. Yap JT Treffert JD Chen CT Cooper MD Image processing of dynamic images with principal component analysis Radiology 1992, 185:177
18. Pedersen F Bergström M Bengtsson E Långström B Principal component analysis of dynamic positron emission tomography images Eur J Nucl Med 1994, 21:1285-1292 10.1007/BF02426691 7875165
19. Thireou T Strauss LG Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A Kontaxakis G Pavlopoulos S Santos A Performance evaluation of principal component analysis in dynamic FDG-PET studies of recurrent colorectal cancer Comput Med Imaging Graph 2003, 27(1):43-51 10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00050-2 12573889
20. Anzai Y Minoshima S Wolf GT Wahl R Head and neck cancer: Detection of recurrence with three-dimensional principal components analysis at dynamic FDG PET Radiology 1999, 212(1):285-290 10405755
21. Spetsieris PG Moeller JR Dhawan V Ishikawa T Eidelberg D Visualizing the evolution of abnormal metabolic networks in the brain using PET Comput Med Imaging Graph 1995, 19(3):295-306 10.1016/0895-6111(95)00011-E 7641174
22. Broussolle E Dentresangle C Landais P Garcia-Larrea L Pollak P Croisile B Hibert O Bonnefoi F Galy G Froment JC Comar D The relation of putamen and caudate nucleus 18F-Dopa uptake to motor and cognitive performances in Parkinson's disease J Neurol Sci 1999, 166:141-151 10.1016/ S0022-510X(99)00127-6 10475108
23. Wernick MN Infusino EJ Milosević M Fast spatio-temporal image reconstruction for dynamic PET. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999, 18(3):185-195 10.1109/42.764885 10363697
24. Chen Z Parker BJ Feng DD Fulton R Temporal Processing of dynamic positron emission tomography via principal component analysis in the sinogram domain IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2004, 51(5):2612-2619 10.1109/ TNS.2004.834816
25. Parker BJ Feng DD Graph-based Mumford-Shah segmentation of dynamic PET with application to input function estimation IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2005, 52(1):79-89 10.1109/TNS.2004.843133
26. Hyvärinen A Karhunen J Oja E Independent Component Analysis John Wiley Sons Inc, USA 2001
27. Zhukov L Weinstein D Johnson C Independent component analysis for EEG source localization IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2000, 19(3):87-96 10.1109/ 51.844386 10834122
28. McKeown MJ Jung T-P Makeig S Brown G Kindermann SS Lee T-W Sejnowski TJ Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the Stroop color-naming task Proc Nat Acad Sci 1998, 95:803-810 33801 9448244 10.1073/pnas.95.3.803
29. Stone JV Porril J Porter NR Wilkinson ID Spatiotemporal independent component analysis of event-related fMRI data using skewed probability density functions Neuroimage 2002, 15(2):407-21 10.1006/nimg.2001.0986 11798275
30. Lee JS Lee DS Ahn JY Cheon GJ Kim SK Yeo JS Seo K Park KS Chung JK Lee MC Blind separation of cardiac components and extraction of input function from H(2)(15)O dynamic myocardial PET using independent component analysis J Nucl Med 2001, 42(6):938-943 11390560
31. Juslin A Reilhac A Magadán-Méndez M Albán E Tohka J Ruotsalainen U Assessment of separation of functional components with ICA from cardiac perfusion PET phantom images for volume extraction with deformable surface model Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2005, 3540:338-347
32. Naganawa M Kimura Y Ishii K Oda K Ishiwata K Matani A Extraction of a plasma time-activity curve from dynamic brain PET images based on independent component analysis IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52(2):201-210 10.1109/TBME.2004.840193 15709657
33. Chen H Yao D Discussion on the choice of separation component in fMRI data analysis by spatial independent component analysis Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 22(6):827-833 10.1016/j.mri.2003.12.003 15234451
34. Bell A Sejnowski T An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution Neural Comput 1995, 7:1129-1159 7584893
35. Lo EH Rogowska J Bogorodzki P Trocha M Matsumoto K Saffran B Wolf GL Temporal correlation analysis of penumbral dynamics in focal cerebral ischemia J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996, 16(1):60-68 10.1097/ 00004647-199601000-00007 8530556
36. Boudraa AO Champier J Djebali M Behloul F Beghdadi A Analysis of dynamic nuclear cardiac images by covariance function Comput Med Imaging Graph 1999, 23(4):181-191 10.1016/S0895-6111(99)00017-8 10551724
37. Rogowska J Preston K Jr Aronen HJ Wolf GL A comparative analysis of similarity mapping and eigenimaging as applied to dynamic MR imaging of low grade astrocytoma Acta Radiol 1994, 35:371-377 8011388
38. Rogowska J Preston K Hunter GJ Hamberg LM Kwong KK Salonen O Wolf GL Applications of similarity mapping in dynamic MRI IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995, 14:480-486 10.1109/42.414613
39. Šámal M Kárný M Benali H Backfrieder W Todd-Pokropek A Bergmann H Experimental comparison of data transformation procedures for analysis of principal components Phys Med Biol 1999, 44:2821-2834 10.1088/0031-9155/44/11/310 10588287
40. Toorongian SA Mulholland GK Jewett DM Bachelor MA Kilbourn MR Routine production of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose by direct nucleophilic exchange on a quaternary 4-aminopyridinium resin. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B 1990, 17(3):273-279 2341282
41. Kontaxakis G Strauss LG Thireou T Ledesma-Carbayo MJ Santos A Pavlopoulos S Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A Iterative image reconstruction for clinical PET using ordered subsets, median root prior and a web-based interface Mol Imaging Biol 2002, 4(3):219-231 10.1016/ S1536-1632(02)00004-5 14537126
42. Strauss LG Conti PS The applications of PET in clinical oncology J Nucl Med 1991, 32:623-648 2013803
43. Keyes JW SUV: Standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 1995, 36:1836-1839 7562051
44. Huang S-C Anatomy of SUV Nucl Med Biol 2000, 27:643-646 10.1016/ S0969-8051(00)00155-4 11091106
45. Erselcan T Turgut B Dogan D Ozdemir S Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002, 29(12):1630-1638 10.1007/ s00259-002-0974-3 12458398