A successful IT change in a police service

Journal of Change Management

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-179

  Collerette, Pierre ^a   Legris, Paul ^a   Manghi, Marina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN OUTAOUAIS   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

change management; support to end users; technological change; Transition management

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049130487     PISSN: 14697017     EISSN: 14791811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14697010600694259     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Akrich, M., and Méadel, C., 1996. “ Coordination et organisation. L'informatique aux prises avec la police ”. In Représenter, Hybrider, Coordonner, Edited by: Méadel, C., and Rabeharisoa, V., 3–14. Paris: Ecole des mines de Paris.
2. Amoako-Gyampah, K., and Salam, A. F., 2004. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information and Management, 41 (6): 731–45.
3. Ashford, S. J., 1988. Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 24 (1): 19
4. Bandura, A., 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2): 248
5. Bareil, C., and Savoie, A., 2000. Comprendre et mieux gérer les individus en situation de changement organisationnel. Revue Gestion, Sept.–Déc: 145–62.
6. BPR Online Learning Center. 2002. An overview of change management ProSci. available at: www.prosci.com (accessed May 2003)
7. Bridges, W., 1991. Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change, Boston, MA: Paperback, Perseus Pr.
8. Brosius, H. B., and Weimann, G., 1996. Who sets the agenda? agenda setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23 (5): 561–80.
9. Brynjolfsson, E., 2003. The IT productivity gap. Optimize Magazine, July: 21
10. Collerette, P., 2003a. Managing organizational change; Part 4: adapting to change. ISO Management Systems, 3 (1): 65–73.
11. Collerette, P., 2003b. Managing organizational change; Part 6: managing the transition. ISO Management Systems, 3 (6): 48–57.
12. Collerette, P., and Schneider, R., 1996. Le pilotage du changement, Québec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
13. Colvin, C. A., and Goh, A., 2005. Validation of the technology acceptance model for police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33: 89–95.
14. Davenport, T. H., 1998. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 74 (4): 121–31.
15. Davis, F. D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3): 319–40.
16. Davis, F. D., 1993. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioural impacts. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 38: 475–87.
17. Davis, F. D., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8): 982–1003.
18. Decker, D., 2001. Effect of organizational change on the individual employee. The Health Care Manager, 19 (4): 1–12.
19. Deloitte Consulting. 1998. “ ERP's second wave: maximizing the value of ERP-enabled processes ”. Atlanta, FL: Deloitte Consulting.
20. DiFonzo, N., and Bordia, P., 1998. A tale of two corporations: managing uncertainty during organizational change. Human Resource Management, 37 (3–4): 295
21. Fiona, F. N., 2001. Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7 (3): 285–96.
22. Jimmieson, N. L., 2004. A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9 (1): 11
23. Langner, T., 1962. A twenty-two item screening score of psychiatric symptoms indicating impairment. Journal of Health and Behavior, 3: 269–76.
24. Lebart, L., 1991. SPAD-N System portable pour l'analyse des données, Paris: CISIA.
25. Legris, P., 2002. Managing organizational change; Part 3: implementation of information technology: from the laboratory to practice. ISO Management Systems, 2 (5): 63–71.
26. Legris, P., 2003. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40: 191–204.
27. Lynn, G. S., and Reilly, R., 2002. How to build a blockbuster. Harvard Business Review, 80 (10): 18–9.
28. McHugh, M., 1997. The stress factor: another item for the change management agenda. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10 (4): 345–62.
29. McNish, M., 2002. Guidelines for managing change: a study of their effects on the implementation of new information technology projects in organizations. Journal of Change Management, 2 (3): 201–11.
30. Mourier, P., and Smith, M., 2001. Conquering organizational change, Atlanta: CEP Press.
31. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I., 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2 (3): 192–222.
32. Nelson, A., 1995. Uncertainty amidst change: the impact of privatization on employee job satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68: 57–71.
33. Orlikowski, W. J., and Tyre, M. J., 1993. Exploiting opportunities for technological improvement in organizations. Sloan Management Review, 35 (1): 13–26.
34. Rogers, E. V., 1995. Diffusion of innovations, Fourth Edition, New York: The Free Press.
35. Sutton, R. I., and Kahn, R. L., 1987. “ Prediction, understanding, and control as antidotes to organizational stress ”. In Handbook of organizational behaviour, Edited by: Lorsch, J., 272–85. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Szamosi, L. T., and Duxbury, L., 2002. Development of a measure to assess organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15 (2): 184–201.
37. The Standish Group International. 1998. Chaos: charting the seas of information technology, a special compass report. available at: http://www.standishgroup.com, (accessed in 2002)
38. The Standish Group International. 2001. Extreme chaos. www.standishgroup.com (accessed in 2002)
39. The Standish Group International. 2003. Chaos report. www.standishgroup.com (accessed in May 2005)
40. Umble, E. J., 2003. Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146: 241–57.
41. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46 (2): 186–204.