Learning objects for educational applications via PDA technology

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-20

  Churchill, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049112441     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, A. T. (2003). I object! Moving beyond learning object to learning components. Educational Technology 43(4), 24-19.
2. Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies for learning. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
3. Barnes, S. (2000). What does electronic conferencing afford distance education? Distance Education, 21(2), 236-247.
4. Bederson, B. B., & Shneiderman, B. (2003). The craft of information visualization: Readings and reflections. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
5. Bradley, C., Haynes, R., & Boyle, T. (2006). Design for multimedia mlearning. Retreived, May 24, 2006 from http://newsletter.alt.ac.uk/ e_article000552781.cfm
6. Churchill, D., & Churchill, N. (in press). Educational Affordances of PDAs: A Study of a Teacher's Exploration of this Technology. Computers & Education.
7. Churchill, D. (2007). Towards a useful classification of learning objects. Education Technology Research & Development, 55(5), 479-497.
8. Cisco Systems (2001). Reusable learning object strategy: Designing information and learning objects through concept, fact, procedure, process, and principle template. San Jose, CA: Cisco Systems, Inc.
9. Clifford, R. (2002, August). Adding a pedagogical dimension to SCORM [Digital Audio Recording]. Oral presentation at the Online Instruction for 21st Century: Connecting Instructional Design to International Standards for Content Reusability, Brigham Young University, Rexburg, Idaho. Retrieved August 30, 2003 from http:// zola.byu.edu/id2scorm/.
10. Clyde, L.A. (2004). M-learning. Teacher Librarian, 32(1), 45-16
11. Cochrane, T. (2005). Interactive QuickTime: Developing and evaluating multimedia learning objects to enhance both face-to-face and distance e-learning environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 1(1) 33-54.
12. De Jong, T., Ainsworth, S., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., Reimann, P., et al. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in science and mathematics: The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. In A. Van Someren (Ed.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 9-40). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
13. E-learning Competency Center. (2003). Explanation on learning objects. Retrieved September 15, 2003 from http://www.ecc.org.sg/loc/ ecplain.htm.
14. Fraser, A. (1999). Web visualization for teachers. Retrieved February 23, 2004, from http://fraser.cc/WebVis/.
15. Gibbons, A. (n.d.). Model-centered instruction: Beyond simulation. Retrieved September 20, 2005, from http://www.gwu.edu/~Ito/gibbons.html.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
17. IEEE. (2001). WG12: Learning object metadata. Retrieved February 15, 2005, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/.
18. Jonassen, D. (2000). Towards design theory of problem solving. ETR&D, 48(4), pp.63-85
19. Kazi, S. A. (2005). Vocatest: An intelligent tutoring systems for vocabulary using mlearning approach. Paper to be presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice Conference, 30 May - 1 June 2005, Singapore.
20. L'Allier, J. J. (1998). NETg's precision skilling: The linking of occupational skills descriptors to training interventions. Retrieved September 15, 2000, from http://www.netg.com/research/pskillpaper.htm.
21. Luchini, K., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Design guidelines for learner-centered handheld tools. CHI 6(1), 135-141.
22. Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43-64.
23. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 125-139.
24. McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(9), 21-32.
25. Merrill, M. D. (2000). Knowledge objects and mental models. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved July 24, 2004 from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/merrill.doc.
26. Norman, D. A. (11988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
27. Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 235-240.
28. Ratto, M., Shapiro, R. B, Truong, T. M., & Griswold, W. G. (2003). The active class project: Experiments in encouraging classroom participation. Retrieved February 22, 2005 from http:// www-cse.ucsd.edu/~wgg/Abstracts/activeclass-cscl03.pdf
29. Ray, B. (2002). PDAs in the classroom: Integration strategies fro K-12 educators. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1). Retrieved November 3, 2004 from http://www.ao.uiuc.edu/ijet/v3n1/ray/ index.html
30. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145-168. Retrieved February 22, 2005 from http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/WalkWildSide.pdf
31. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2003). External and internal representations in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 117-123.
32. Sharpies, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34, 177-193.
33. Sharples, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 220-234
34. So, K. K. T. (2004). Applying wireless technology in field trips: A Hong Kong experience. Australian Educational Computing, 19(2). Retrieved January 20, 2005 from http://www.cite.hku.hk/people/tkkso/ Publications/2004/Applying%20Wireless%20Technology%20in% 20Field%20Trips.doc
35. Tufte, E (1997). Visual explanations. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
36. Tufte, E (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
37. Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
38. Van Someren, A. (1998). Learning with multiple representations. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
39. Van Someren, A., Boshuizen, P.A., De Jong, T. & Reimann, P. (1998). Introduction. In A. Van Someren (Ed.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 1-5). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
40. Wiley, D. & Edwards, E. (2002). Online self-organizing social systems: The decentralized future of online learning. Retrieved November 20, 2003 from http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/ososs.pdf.
41. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Eds.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved July 24, 2004, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.
42. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42, 289-314.