Finding coevolving amino acid residues using row and column weighting of mutual information and multi-dimensional amino acid representation

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Gouveia Oliveira, Rodrigo ^a   Pedersen, Anders G ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049100485     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17487188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7188-2-12     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pollock DD Genomic biodiversity, phylogenetics and coevolution in proteins Appl Bioinformatics 2002, 1(2):81-92. 15130847
2. Pazos F Helmer-Citterich M Ausiello G Valencia A Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction J Mol Biol 1997, 271(4):511-523. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1198 9281423
3. Socolich M Lockless SW Russ WP Lee H Gardner KH Ranganathan R Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold Nature 2005, 437(7058):512-518. 10.1038/nature03991 16177782
4. Ridley M The explanation of organic diversity: The comparative method and adaptations for mating Oxford University Press 1983
5. Maddison WP A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree Evolution 1990, 44:539-557. 10.2307/2409434
6. Harvey PA Pagel MD The comparative method in evolutionary biology Oxford University Press 1991
7. Pollock DD Taylor WR Goldman N Coevolving protein residues: Maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure J Mol Biol 1999, 287(1):187-198. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2601 10074416
8. Dimmic MW Hubisz MJ Bustamante CD Nielsen R Detecting coevolving amino acid sites using Bayesian mutational mapping Bioinformatics 2005, 21(Suppl 1):i126-i135. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1032 15961449
9. McLachlan AD Tests for comparing related amino-acid sequences. Cytochrome c and cytochrome c 551 J Mol Biol 1971, 61(2):409-424. 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90390-1 5167087
10. Gobel U Sander C Schneider R Valencia A Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins Proteins 1994, 18(4):309-317. 10.1002/ prot.340180402 8208723
11. Kass I Horovitz A Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations Proteins 2002, 48(4):611-617. 10.1002/prot.10180 12211028
12. Tillier ER Lui TW Using multiple interdependency to separate functional from phylogenetic correlations in protein alignments Bioinformatics 2003, 19(6):750-755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg072 12691987
13. Pritchard L Bladon P J MOM M JD Evaluation of a novel method for the identification of coevolving protein residues Protein Eng 2001, 14(8):549-555. 10.1093/protein/14.8.549 11579223
14. Noivirt O Eisenstein M Horovitz A Detection and reduction of evolutionary noise in correlated mutation analysis Protein Eng Des Sel 2005, 18(5):247-253. 10.1093/protein/gzi029 15911538
15. Martin LC Gloor GB Dunn SD Wahl LM Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins Bioinformatics 2005, 21(22):4116-4124. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti671 16159918
16. Kundrotas PJ Alexov EG Predicting residue contacts using pragmatic correlated mutations method: Reducing the false positives BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:503. 1654194 17109752 10.1186/1471-2105-7-503
17. Fares MA Travers SA A novel method for detecting intramolecular coevolution: Adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses Genetics 2006, 173(1):9-23. 1461439 16547113 10.1534/ genetics.105.053249
18. Gloor GB Martin LC Wahl LM Dunn SD Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions Biochemistry 2005, 44(19):7156-7165. 10.1021/bi050293e 15882054
19. Dekker JP Fodor A Aldrich RW Yellen G A perturbation-based method for calculating explicit likelihood of evolutionary co-variance in multiple sequence alignments Bioinformatics 2004, 20(10):1565-1572. 10.1093/ bioinformatics/bth128 14962924
20. Suel GM Lockless SW Wall MA Ranganathan R Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10(1):59-69. 10.1038/nsb881 12483203
21. Fodor AA Aldrich RW Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments Proteins 2004, 56(2):211-221. 10.1002/prot.20098 15211506
22. Gesell T von Haeseler A In silico sequence evolution with site-specific interactions along phylogenetic trees Bioinformatics 2006, 22(6):716-722. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti812 16332711
23. Parisi G Echave J Structural constraints and emergence of sequence patterns in protein evolution Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18(5):750-756. 11319259
24. Rodrigue N Philippe H Lartillot N Assessing site-interdependent phylogenetic models of sequence evolution Mol Biol Evol 2006, 23(9):1762-1775. 10.1093/molbev/msl041 16787998
25. Henikoff S Henikoff JG Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89(22):10915-10919. 50453 1438297 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915
26. Gorodkin J Staerfeldt HH Lund O Brunak S MatrixPlot: Visualizing sequence constraints Bioinformatics 1999, 15(9):769-770. 10.1093/ bioinformatics/15.9.769 10498780
27. Shannon CE A mathematical theory of communication Bell System Technical Journal 1948, 27:379-423.
28. Buck MJ Atchley WR Networks of coevolving sites in structural and functional domains of serpin proteins Mol Biol Evol 2005, 22(7):1627-1634. 10.1093/molbev/msi157 15858204
29. Fawcett T ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers Technical report Palo Alto: HP Laboratories Laboratories H 2004