Quantum chaos, delocalization, and entanglement in disordered Heisenberg models

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Brown, Winton G ^a   Santos, Lea F ^a   Starling, David J ^b   Viola, Lorenza ^a  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; HILBERT SPACES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUANTUM THEORY;

DISORDERED HEISENBERG MODELS; QUANTUM CHAOS;

SPIN DYNAMICS;

EID: 38949196507     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.021106     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math. ANMAAH 0003-486X 10.2307/1970079 62, 548 (1955)
2. E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math. ANMAAH 0003-486X 10.2307/1969956 65, 203 (1957)
3. E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math. ANMAAH 0003-486X 10.2307/1970008 67, 325 (1958).
4. F. M. Izrailev, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90067-C 196, 299 (1990).
5. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic Press, Boston, 1991).
6. T. Guhr, A. Mueller-Gröeling, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(97)00088-4 299, 189 (1998).
7. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000).
8. G. Benenti, G. Casati, and G. Strini, Principles of Quantum Computation and Information: Basic Tools and Special Topics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2007).
9. B. Georgeot and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6366 62, 6366 (2000).
10. B. Georgeot and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3504 62, 3504 (2000).
11. A. Harrow, P. Hayden, and D. Leung, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187901 92, 187901 (2004)
12. C. H. Bennett, P. Hayden, D. Leung, P. Shor, and A. Winter, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IETTAW 0018-9448 10.1109/TIT.2004.839476 51, 56 (2005).
13. E. Schrödinger, Naturwiss. NATWAY 0028-1042 10.1007/BF01491891 23, 807 (1935).
14. L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys., arXiv:quant-ph/0703044. 0034-6861
15. F. D. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.227205 93, 227205 (2004)
16. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 91, 147902 (2003)
17. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040502 93, 040502 (2004).
18. P. A. Miller and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1542 60, 1542 (1999).
19. M. Znidaric and T. Prosen, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/36/10/307 36, 2463 (2003).
20. A. J. Scott and C. M. Caves, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/36/36/308 36, 9553 (2003).
21. P. Jacquod, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 150403 92, 150403 (2004).
22. S. Ghose and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062315 70, 062315 (2004).
23. X. Wang, H. Li, and B. Hu, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.054303 69, 054303 (2004).
24. J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.060402 89, 060402 (2002).
25. J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016201 69, 016201 (2004).
26. A. Lakshminarayan and V. Subrahmanyam, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062334 71, 062334 (2005).
27. Y. S. Weinstein and C. S. Hellberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.030501 95, 030501 (2005).
28. S. Montangero and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.040302 73, 040302 (R) (2006).
29. A. Lakshminarayan and V. Subrahmanyam, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052304 67, 052304 (2003).
30. L. F. Santos, G. Rigolin, and C. O. Escobar, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.042304 69, 042304 (2004).
31. C. Mejia-Monasterio, G. Benenti, G. G. Carlo, and G. Casati, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062324 71, 062324 (2005).
32. J. Karthik, A. Sharma, and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022304 75, 022304 (2007).
33. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 57, 120 (1998).
34. D. P. DiVincenzo, D. Bacon, J. Kempe, G. Burkard, and K. B. Whaley, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35042541 408, 339 (2000).
35. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/30156 393, 133 (1998).
36. M. I. Dykman and P. M. Platzman, Fortschr. Phys. FPYKA6 0015-8208 10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<1095::AID-PROP1095>3.0.CO;2-U 48, 1095 (2000).
37. D. Bacon, K. R. Brown, and K. B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.247902 87, 247902 (2001).
38. M. I. Dykman and L. F. Santos, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/36/44/L01 36, L561 (2003).
39. L. F. Santos and M. I. Dykman, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.214410 68, 214410 (2003).
40. Y. S. Weinstein, C. S. Hellberg, and J. Levy, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.020304 72, 020304 (R) (2005).
41. H. Barnum, E. Knill, G. Ortiz, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032308 68, 032308 (2003).
42. H. Barnum, E. Knill, G. Ortiz, R. Somma, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.107902 92, 107902 (2004).
43. R. Somma, G. Ortiz, H. Barnum, E. Knill, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.042311 70, 042311 (2004).
44. Y. S. Weinstein and L. Viola, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2006-10354-7 76, 746 (2006).
45. R. Somma, H. Barnum, G. Ortiz, and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.190501 97, 190501 (2006).
46. F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).
47. V. V. Flambaum and F. M. Izrailev, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5144 56, 5144 (1997).
48. V. V. Flambaum, A. A. Gribakina, G. F. Gribakin, and I. V. Ponomarev, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00228-0 131, 205 (1999).
49. S. Weigert, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90053-P 56, 107 (1992).
50. A. Enciso and D. Peralta-Salas, Theor. Math. Phys. 148, 1086 (2006). 0040-5779
51. V. V. Flambaum, Aust. J. Phys. 53, 489 (2000). 0004-9506
52. E. K. Sklyanin, in Quantum Groups and Quantum Integrable Systems, edited by, Mo-Lin Ge, Nankai Lectures in Mathematics and Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
53. P. Jacquod and I. Varga, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.134101 89, 134101 (2002).
54. P. Jacquod and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1837 79, 1837 (1997).
55. V. Zelevinsky, B. A. Brown, N. Frazier, and M. Horoi, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00007-5 276, 85 (1996).
56. Different conventions and terminology are found in the literature. In fact, there are at least three names given to the quantity defined in Eq. 5: In addition to the NPC terminology we follow here [see, e.g., V. K. B. Kota and R. Sahu, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016219 64, 016219 (2001)], the NPC is also referred to as the participation number (PN) in. Furthermore, the definitions of NPC vs IPR are often interchanged, as in. Adding to the confusion, there is overlap in terminology with a similar measure of mixedness, [tr (ρ2)] -1, which is also, sometimes, referred to as either IPR or PN.
57. G. P. Berman, F. Borgonovi, F. M. Izrailev, and V. I. Tsifrinovich, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.056226 64, 056226 (2001).
58. E. Chudnovsky and J. Tejada, Lectures on Magnetism (Rinton Press, Paramus, NJ, 2006).
59. T. C. Hsu and J. C. Angles d'Auriac, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.14291 47, 14291 (1993).
60. K. Kudo and T. Deguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.74.1992 74, 1992 (2005).
61. D. A. Rabson, B. N. Narozhny, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.054403 69, 054403 (2004).
62. Y. Avishai, J. Richert, and R. Berkovits, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.052416 66, 052416 (2002).
63. L. F. Santos, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/37/17/004 37, 4723 (2004).
64. K. Kudo and T. Deguchi, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.132404 69, 132404 (2004).
65. R. Vrijen, E. Yablonovitch, K. Wang, H. W. Jiang, A. Balandin, V. Roychowdhury, T. Mor, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.012306 62, 012306 (2000).
66. L.-A. Wu and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.050303 67, 050303 (R) (2003).
67. Y. S. Weinstein and C. S. Hellberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.110501 98, 110501 (2007).
68. L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2417 82, 2417 (1999)
69. L. Viola and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.037901 90, 037901 (2003)
70. L. Viola and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.060502 94, 060502 (2005).
71. We verified that using Gaussian-distributed random numbers in place of uniform random numbers produced no significant qualitative difference.
72. J. B. French and S. S. M. Wong, Phys. Lett. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(70)90213-3 33B, 449 (1970).
73. O. Bohigas and J. Flores, Phys. Lett. 34B, 261 (1971). 0370-2693
74. T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey, and S. S. M. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.53.385 53, 385 (1981).
75. V. K. B. Kota and R. Sahu, Phys. Lett. B PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00461-4 429, 1 (1998).
76. V. K. B. Kota, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00113-7 347, 223 (2001).
77. Technically, for the TBRE, recovery of GOE statistics requires unfolding the spectrum of each member individually, as implemented in our numerical procedure.
78. A set of mutually commuting operators acting on Hilbert space H is complete if and only if their corresponding eigenvalues label a basis of H.
79. As a particular feature of the Sz =0 -subspace of H0, note that it is also invariant under the discrete transformation Z2 = i=1 L σx (i), which is associated with a global π rotation about the x axis. However, since the value of the total angular momentum determines the irreducible representation according to which each state transforms under rotations, such a Z2 symmetry is not independent of S2, and consequently does not induce additional invariant subspaces.
80. T. Guhr and H. A. Weidenmüller, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/0003-4916(90)90383-Y 199, 412 (1990).
81. A. A. El-Hady, A. Y. Abul-Magd, and M. H. Simbel, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/35/10/302 35, 2361 (2002).
82. L. F. Santos, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062306 67, 062306 (2003).
83. M. I. Dykman, L. F. Santos, and M. Shapiro, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. JOBOFD 1464-4266 10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/024 7, S363 (2005).
84. H. A. Bethe, Z. Phys. ZEPYAA 0044-3328 10.1007/BF01341708 71, 205 (1931).
85. C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.150.321 150, 321 (1966).
86. F. C. Alcaraz, M. N. Barber, and M. T. Batchelor, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/0003-4916(88)90015-2 182, 280 (1988).
87. M. Karbach and G. Müller, Comput. Phys. 11, 36 (1997). 0894-1866
88. V. V. Sokolov, B. A. Brown, and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.56 58, 56 (1998).
89. Both reflection subspaces with S=1 possess approximately Poisson distribution at δε=0. This was verified on a 14-qubit chain to get better statistics. An analysis of the overall distribution across all symmetry subspaces of a seven-qubit chain was carried out in.
90. S. K. Ma, C. Dasgupta, and C. K. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1434 43, 1434 (1979).
91. C. Dasgupta and S. K. Ma, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.1305 22, 1305 (1980).
92. R. N. Bhatt and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.344 48, 344 (1982).
93. Note that the transition to nonintegrability occurs at a larger value than in the other disorder settings, e.g., δJ/δε∼10 in 1D. The reason for this shift is simply the fact that, given the parametrization used, the range of the interaction is chosen, but the ratio between the average interaction strength and the on-site disorder strength should be considered for a fair comparison.
94. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 2245 80, 2245 (1998).
95. D. M. Greenberger, M. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989).
96. A. J. Scott and C. Caves, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/36/36/308 36, 9553 (2003).
97. L. Viola and H. Barnum, Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement, edited by, Alisa Bokulich, and, Gregg Jaeger, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) (in press).
98. D. Meyer and N. Wallach, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1497700 43, 4273 (2002).
99. G. Brennen, Quantum Inf. Comput. QICUAW 1533-7146 3, 619 (2003).
100. L. Viola and W. G. Brown, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S17 40, 8109 (2007).
101. Given two binary strings of equal length, the Hamming distance counts the number of substitutions needed to change one into the other. Physically, this has a simple interpretation in terms of spin-flip operations.
102. O. Giraud, J. Martin, and B. Georgeot, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042333 76, 042333 (2007).
103. I. Percival, J. Phys. B JPAMA4 0022-3700 10.1088/0022-3700/6/9/002 6, L229 (1973).