Semiclassical time evolution of the reduced density matrix and dynamically assisted generation of entanglement for bipartite quantum systems

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 15, 2004, Pages

  Jacquod, Ph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; HAMILTONIANS; HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS; LYAPUNOV METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BIPARTITE QUANTUM SYSTEMS; CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; INTERACTION STRENGTH; REDUCED DENSITY MATRIX;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2542442695     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.150403     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. E. Schrödinger, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 555 (1936).
2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
3. K. Furuya, M. C. Nemes, and G. Q. Pellegrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5524 (1998).
4. P. A. Miller and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1542 (1999).
5. A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E 64, 036207 (2001); J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E 69, 016201 (2004).
6. A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E 64, 036207 (2001); J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E 69, 016201 (2004).
7. A. Tanaka, H. Fujisaki, and T. Miyadera, Phys. Rev. E 66, 045201(R) (2002); H. Fujisaki, T. Miyadera, and A. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066201 (2003).
8. A. Tanaka, H. Fujisaki, and T. Miyadera, Phys. Rev. E 66, 045201(R) (2002); H. Fujisaki, T. Miyadera, and A. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066201 (2003).
9. M. Žnidarič and T. Prosen, J. Phys. A 36, 2463 (2003).
10. A. J. Scott and C. M. Caves, J. Phys. A 36, 9553 (2003).
11. Care should, however, be taken when comparing fully chaotic systems with regular ones, as there is no universality to be expected in the latter case.
12. W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
13. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987).
14. Yu Shi, Phys. Rev. A 67, 024301 (2003).
15. R. A. Jalabert and H. M. Pastawski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2490 (2001).
16. Ph. Jacquod, ̇I. Adagideli, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Europhys. Lett. 61, 729 (2003).
17. N. R. Cerruti and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 054103 (2002); J. Vanicek and E J. Heller, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016211 (2003).
18. N. R. Cerruti and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 054103 (2002); J. Vanicek and E J. Heller, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016211 (2003).
19. Ph. Jacquod, P. G. Silvestrov, and C.W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. E 64, 055203(R) (2001).
20. N. R. Cerruti and S. Tomsovic, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 36, 3451 (2003).
21. Ph. Jacquod (unpublished).
22. s′, r; r), the two-particle action thus vanishes and no entanglement is generated, as should be.
23. A. M. Ozorio de Almeida, Hamiltonian Systems: Chaos and Quantization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988).
24. Because of the second line in Eq. (6), the connection proposed in Ref. [22] between decoherence and Loschmidt Echo breaks down at short times.
25. F. M. Cucchietti, D. A. R. Dalvit, J P. Paz, and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 210403 (2003).
26. G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica (Amsterdam) 91A, 450 (1978); M.V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
27. G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica (Amsterdam) 91A, 450 (1978); M.V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
28. T. Prosen and M. Žnidarič, New J. Phys. 5, 109 (2003).
29. G. A. Fiete and E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022112 (2003).
30. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44, No. 10, 36 (1991); A. K. Pattanayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4526 (1999).
31. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44, No. 10, 36 (1991); A. K. Pattanayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4526 (1999).