On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 28-54

  Kingston, John ^a   Diehl, Randy L ^b   Kirk, Cecilia J ^c   Castleman, Wendy A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949142319     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ashby F.G., and Maddox W.T. Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 598-612
2. Ashby F.G., and Townsend J.T. Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 154-179
3. Benkí J.R. Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in English. Journal of Phonetics 29 (2001) 1-22
4. Best C.T., Morrongiello B.A., and Robson R. Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 29 (1981) 191-211
5. Blumstein S.E., and Stevens K.N. Acoustic invariance in speech production: Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (1979) 1001-1017
6. Blumstein S.E., and Stevens K.N. Perceptual invariance and onset spectra from stop consonants in different vowel environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67 (1980) 648-662
7. Caisse, M. (1982). Cross-linguistic differences in fundamental frequency induced by voiceless aspirated stops. M.A. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
8. Castleman W.A., and Diehl R.L. Effects of fundamental frequency on medial and final [voice] judgments. Journal of Phonetics 24 (1996) 383-398
9. Denes P. Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27 (1955) 761-764
10. Diehl R.L., and Kingston J. Phonetic covariation as auditory enhancement: The case of the [+voice]/[-voice] distinction. In: Engstrand O., and Kylander C. (Eds). Current phonetic research paradigms: Implications for speech motor control, PERILUS XIV (1991), Stockholm University, Stockholm 139-143
11. Diehl R.L., Kingston J., and Castleman W.A. On the internal perceptual structure of phonological features: The [voice] distinction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1995) 3333 (abstract)
12. Diehl R.L., and Molis M.R. Effect of fundamental frequency on medial [voice] judgments. Phonetica 52 (1995) 188-195
13. Diehl R.L., and Walsh M.A. An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85 (1989) 2154-2164
14. Diehl R.L., Walsh M.A., and Kluender K.R. On the interpretability of speech/nonspeech comparisons: A reply to Fowler. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89 (1991) 2905-2909
15. Docherty, G. J. (1989). An experimental study of the timing of voicing in English obstruents. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
16. Fischer R.M., and Ohde R.N. Spectral and duration properties of front vowels as cues to final stop-consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88 (1990) 1250-1259
17. Fitch H.L., Halwes T., Erickson D.M., and Liberman A.M. Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner. Perception and Psychophysics 27 (1980) 343-350
18. Fowler C.A. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics 14 (1986) 3-28
19. Fowler C.A. Sound-producing sources as the objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88 (1990) 1236-1249
20. Fowler C.A. Auditory perception is not special: We see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89 (1991) 2910-2915
21. Fowler C.A. Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: There are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics 20 (1992) 143-165
22. Fowler C.A. Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (1996) 1730-1741
23. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure (1974), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Potomac, MD
24. Haggard M., Ambler S., and Callow M. Pitch as a voicing cue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 47 (1970) 613-617
25. Haggard M., Summerfield Q., and Roberts M. Psychoacoustical and cultural determinants of phoneme boundaries: Evidence from trading of cues in the voiced-voiceless distinction. Journal of Phonetics 9 (1981) 49-62
26. Holt L.L., Lotto A.J., and Kluender K.R. Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 (2001) 764-774
27. Kewley-Port D., Pisoni D.B., and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73 (1983) 1779-1793
28. Kingston J., and Diehl R.L. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70 (1994) 419-454
29. Kingston J., and Diehl R.L. Intermediate properties in the perception of distinctive feature values. In: Arvaniti A., and Connell B. (Eds). Papers in laboratory phonology IV (1995), Cambridge UP, Cambridge, UK 7-27
30. Kingston J., Diehl R.L., Kluender K.R., and Parker E.M. Resonance vs. source characteristics in perceiving spectral continuity between vowels and consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88 (1990) S55 (abstract)
31. 1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1995) 1261-1285
32. Kingston J., Macmillan N.A., Walsh Dickey L., Thorburn R., and Bartels C. Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1997) 1696-1709
33. Klatt D.H. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67 (1980) 971-995
34. Klatt D.H., and Klatt L.C. Analysis, synthesis and perception of voice quality variations among male and female talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (1990) 820-856
35. Kluender K.R. Effects of first formant onset properties on VOT judgments can be explained by auditory processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90 (1991) 83-96
36. Kluender K.R. Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In: Gernsbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press, San Diego 173-217
37. Kohler K.J. Dimensions in the perception of fortis and lenis plosives. Phonetica 36 (1979) 332-343
38. Lahiri A., Gewirth L., and Blumstein S.E. A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: Evidence from a cross-language study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1984) 391-404
39. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74 (1967) 431-461
40. Liberman A.M., and Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21 (1985) 1-36
41. Lindblom B. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H & H theory. In: Hardcastle W.J., and Marchal A. (Eds). Speech production and speech modeling (1990), Kluwer, Dordrecht 403-439
42. Lisker L. Closure duration and the intervocalic voiced-voiceless distinction in English. Language 33 (1957) 42-49
43. Lisker L. Is it VOT or a first formant transition detector?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 57 (1975) 1547-1551
44. Lisker L. On buzzing the English [b]. Haskins Laboratories. Status Report on Speech Research 55/56 (1978) 181-188
45. Lisker L. "Voicing" in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/versus/p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 19 (1986) 3-11
46. Lisker L., and Abramson A.S. A cross-linguistic study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20 (1964) 384-422
47. Macmillan N.A., and Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide (1991), Cambridge University Press, New York
48. Macmillan N.A., and Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide. 2nd ed. (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
49. Macmillan N.A., and Kingston J. Integrality, correspondence, and configurality represent different degrees of perceptual interaction, not different types. In: Possamaï C.-A. (Ed). Fechner Day 1995 (1995), International Society for Psychophysics, Cassis 243-248
50. 1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (1999) 2913-2932
51. Maddox W.T. Perceptual and decisional separability. In: Ashby F.G. (Ed). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 147-180
52. Massaro D.W., and Cohen M.M. The contribution of fundamental frequency and voice onset time to the /zi/-/si/ distinction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60 (1976) 704-717
53. Molis M.R., and Diehl R.L. First formant spectral properties and the initial stop-consonant [voice] judgments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (1996) 2591 (abstract)
54. Nearey T.M. The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 19 (1990) 347-373
55. Nearey T.M. Speech perception as pattern recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1997) 3241-3254
56. Parker E.M., Diehl R.L., and Kluender K.R. Trading relations in speech and nonspeech. Perception and Psychophysics 39 (1986) 129-142
57. Port R., and Dalby J. Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 32 (1982) 141-152
58. Raphael L.F. Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51 (1972) 1296-1303
59. Repp B.H. Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92 (1982) 81-110
60. 0 segmental cues depend on intonation: The case of the rise after voiced stops. Phonetica 43 (1986) 76-91
61. Stevens K.N., and Blumstein S.E. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64 (1978) 1358-1368
62. Stevens K.N., and Blumstein S.E. The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In: Eimas P.D., and Miller J.L. (Eds). Perspectives on the study of speech (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1-38
63. Stevens K.N., and Klatt D.H. Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55 (1974) 653-659
64. Summerfield A.Q., and Haggard M. On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62 (1977) 435-448
65. 1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84 (1988) 485-493
66. Whalen D.H., Abramson A.S., Lisker L., and Mody M. Gradient effects of fundamental frequency on stop consonant voicing judgments. Phonetica 47 (1990) 36-49