Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in English

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-22

  Benkí, José R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008872093     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0128     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Caisse M. Cross-linguistic differences in fundamental frequency perturbation induced by voiceless unaspirated stops. 1982;University of California.
2. Cho T., Ladefoged P. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics. 27:1999;207-229.
3. Chomsky N., Halle M. The sound pattern of English. 1968;Harper & Row, New York.
4. Cooper A. An articulatory account of aspiration in English. 1991a;Yale University.
5. Cooper A. Laryngeal and oral gestures in English /p, t, k/. Proceedings of the international congress of phonetic sciences. 2:1991b;50-53.
6. Cooper F. S., Liberman A. M., Delattre P., Gerstman L. Some experiments on the perception of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 24:1952;597-606.
7. Diehl R. L., Kluender K. R. On the categorization of speech sounds. Harnad S. Categorical Perception. 1987;226-253 Cambridge, Cambridge.
8. Docherty G. J. The Timing of Voicing in English obstruents. 1992;Foris Publications, Berlin.
9. Fischer-Jørgensen E. Voicing, tenseness, and aspiration in stop consonants, with special reference to French and Danish. Annual report of the Institute of Phonetics. 3:1968;University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. p. 63-114.
10. Hardcastle W. J. Some observations on the Tense-Lax distinction in initial stops in Korean. Journal of Phonetics. 1:1973;263-271.
11. Hillenbrand J. Perception of sine-wave analogs of voice-onset time stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 75:1984;231-240.
12. Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 1989;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
13. Jakobson R., Fant C. G. M., Halle M. Preliminaries to speech analysis: the distinctive features and their correlates. 1951;MIT Press, Cambridge.
14. Jessen M. Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. 1998;John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
15. Kingston J., Diehl R. L. Phonetic knowledge. Language. 70:1994;419-454.
16. Klatt D. H., Klatt L. C. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among male and female talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 87:1990;820-857.
17. Kluender K. R. Effects of first formant onset properties on voicing judgments result from processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90:1991;83-96.
18. Kluender K. R., Lotto A. J. Effects of first formant onset frequency on voice judgments result from auditory processes not specific to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 95:1994;1044-1052.
19. Kluender K. R., Lotto A. J. Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 105:1999;503-511.
20. Kuhl P. K., Miller J. D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science. 190:1975;69-72.
21. Kuhl P. K., Miller J. D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 63:1978;905-917.
22. Liberman A. M., Delattre P. C., Cooper F. S. Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech. 1:1958;153-167.
23. Lindblom B. The goal of phonetics, its unification and application. Phonetica. 37:1980;7-26.
24. Lisker L. Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 57:1975;1547-1551.
25. Lisker L. "Voicing" in English: a catalog of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech. 29:1986;3-11.
26. Lisker L., Abramson A. S. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word. 20:1964;384-422.
27. Lisker L., Abramson A. S. The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. Halá B., Romportl M., Janota P. Proceedings of the 6th international conference of phonetic sciences. 1970;563-567 Academia, Prague.
28. Lisker L., Liberman A. M., Erickson D. M., Dechovitz D., Mandler R. On pushing the voice onset time (VOT) boundary about. Language and Speech. 20:1977;209-216.
29. Lorch R. F., Myers J. L. Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 16:1990;149-157.
30. Maddieson I. Phonetic universals. Laver J., Hardcastle W. J. The handbook of phonetic sciences. 1997;619-639 Blackwells, Oxford.
31. Massaro D. W. Speech perception by ear and eye: a paradigm for psychological inquiry. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
32. Massaro D. W., Cohen G. C. Phonological context in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics. 34:1983;338-348.
33. Mermelstein P. On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information. Perception and Psychophysics. 23:1978;331-335.
34. Miller J. L. Nonindependence of feature processing in initial consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 20:1977;519-528.
35. Miller G. A., Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 27:1955;338-352.
36. Myers J. L., Well A. D. Research design and statistical analysis. 1991;HarperCollins, New York.
37. Nearey T. M. The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics. 18:1990;347-373.
38. Nearey T. M. Context effects in a double-weak theory of speech perception. Language and Speech. 35:1992;153-172.
39. Nearey T. M. Speech perception as pattern recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 101:1997;3241-3254.
40. Oden G. C., Massaro D. W. Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review. 85:1978;172-191.
41. Oden G. C., Massaro D. W. Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 67:1980;996-1013.
42. Ohala J. J. There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view. Journal of Phonetics. 18:1990;153-171.
43. Parker E. M. Auditory constraints on the perception of stop voicing: the influence of lower-tone simultaneity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 83:1988;1597-1607.
44. Peterson G. E., Lehiste I. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 32:1960;693-703.
45. Pind J. The role of F 1 in the perception of voice onset time and voice offset time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 106:1999;434-437.
46. Pisoni D. B. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implication for voicing perception in stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 61:1977;1352-1361.
47. Postman L., Tolman E. C. Brunswik's probabilistic functionalism. Koch S. Psychology: a study of a science. Vol. 1. Sensory, perceptual, and physiological formulations. 1959;502-564 McGraw-Hill, New York.
48. Repp B. Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new evidence for a phonetic mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin. 92:1982;81-110.
49. Sawusch J. R., Pisoni D. B. On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics. 2:1974;181-194.
50. Stevens K. N. Acoustic Phonetics. 1998;MIT Press, Cambridge.
51. Stevens K. N., Blumstein S. E. The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. Eimas P. D., Miller J. L. Perspectives on the study of speech. 1981;1-38 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
52. Stevens K. N., Klatt D. H. Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction of stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 55:1974;653-659.
53. Summerfield A. Q., Haggard M. P. On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 62:1977;435-448.
54. Summerfield Q. A. Processing of cues and contexts in the perception of voicing contrasts. Fant G. Preprints of the 1974 Stockholm speech communication seminar. 3:1974;77-86 Almqvist and Wiksell, Upsala.
55. Umeda N. Consonant duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 61:1977;846-858.
56. Whalen D. Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information. Perception and Psychophysics. 46:1989;284-292.
57. Weismer G. Control of the voicing distinction for intervocalic stops and fricatives: some data and theoretical considerations. Journal of Phonetics. 8:1980;427-438.
58. Zue V. Acoustic characteristics of stop consonants. 1976;Indiana University Linguistics Club.