The spatial relationship between post-crop remaining trees and the establishment of saplings in Pinus sylvestris stands in Spain

Applied Vegetation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 151-160

  Montes, F ^a   Canellas I ^a  

^a Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

Author keywords

Forest regeneration; Forest structure; Scots pine; Spatial pattern

Indexed keywords

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 38949111143     PISSN: 14022001     EISSN: 1654109X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2007.tb00513.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aldrich, P.R., Parker, G.R., Ward, J.S. & Michler, C.H. 2003. Spatial dispersion of trees in an old-growth temperate hardwood forest over 60 years of succession. For. Ecol. Manage. 180: 475-491.
2. Berger, A.L. & Puettmann, K.J. 2000. Overstory composition and stand structure influence herbaceous plant diversity in the mixed aspen forest of northern Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat. 143: 111-125.
3. Besag, J. 1977. Efficiency of pseudolikelihood estimation for simple Gaussian fields. Biometrika 64: 616-618.
4. Dale, M.R.T. 1999. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Degraaf, R.M., Hestbeck, J.B. & Yamasaki, M. 1998. Associations between breeding bird abundance and stand structure in the White Mountains, New Hampshire and Maine, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 103: 217-233.
6. Denslow, J.S. & Guzman, S. 2000. Variation in stand structure, light and seedling abundance across a tropical moist forest chronosequence, Panama. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 201-212.
7. Ferris-Kaan, R., Peace, A.J. & Humphrey, J.W. 1998. Assessing structural diversity in managed forests. Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL.
8. Franklin, J.F., Spies, T.A., Pelt, R.V., Carey, A.B., Thornburgh, D.A., Berg, D.R., Lindenmayer, D.B., Harmon, M.E., Keeton, W.S., Shaw, D.C., Bible, K. & Chen, J. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manage. 155: 399-423.
9. Goreaud, F. & Pélissier, R. 1999. On explicit formulas of edge correction for Ripleys K-function. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 433-438.
10. Goreaud, F. & Pélissier, R. 2003. Avoiding misinterpretation of biotic interactions with the intertype K12-function: population independence vs. random labelling hypothesis. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 681-692
11. Goreaud, F., Loreau, M. & Millier, C. 2002. Spatial structure and the survival of an inferior competitor: a theoretical model of neighbourhood competition in plants. Ecol. Model. 158: 1-19.
12. Greig-Smith, P. 1952. The use of random and contiguous quadrats in the study of structure in plant communities. Ann. Bot. 16: 293-316.
13. Hanewinkel, M. 2004. Spatial patterns in mixed coniferous even-aged, uneven-aged and conversion stands. Eur. J. For. Res. 123: 139-155.
14. Hanish, K.H. & Stoyan, D. 1979. Formulas for second order analysis of marked point processes. Mathem. Operationforsch. Stat. Ser. Stat. 14: 559-567.
15. Hunter, M.L. 1990. Wildlife, forests, and forestry: Principles of managing forests for biological diversity. Prentice-Hall, Ěnglewood Cliffs, NJ, US.
16. Kelly, D.L. & Connolly, A. 2000. A review of the plant communities associated with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Europe, and an evaluation of putative indicator/specialist species. Investig. Agr. Sist. Recursos For. Fuera de serie 1: 15-39.
17. Kuuluvainen, T., Penttinen, A., Leinonen, L. & Nygren, M. 1996. Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: an example from boreal Spruce forest in Southern Finland. Silva Fenn. 30: 315-328.
18. Lewis, P.A.W. & Shedler, G.S. 1979. Simulation of non-homogeneous Poisson processes by thinning. Naval Res. Logistics Quart. 26: 403-414.
19. Lingua, E., Genin, J.R. & Motta, R. 2004. Spatial and temporal patterns of Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra L.) and European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) regeneration at tree line in the Italian Alps. Series of Conference Proceedings No. 1, Zentrum Wald-Forst-Holz Weihenstephan, Kloster Seeon, DE.
20. Ludwig, J. A. & Reynolds, J.F. 1988. Statistical ecology. Wiley, New York, NY, US.
21. MacArthur, R.M. & MacArthur, J.W. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594-598.
22. Mason, WL. 2000. Silviculture and stand dynamics in Scots pine forests in Great Britain; implications for biodiversity. Investig. Agr. Sist. Recursos For. Fuera de serie 1: 175-197.
23. Mason, W.L. & Alia, R. 2000. Current and future status of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in Europe. Investig. Agr. Sist. Recursos For. Fuera de serie No 1: 318-333.
24. Moeur, M. 1993. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data. For. Sci. 39: 756-775.
25. Montes, F., Cañellas, I. del Río, M., Calama, R. & Montero, G. 2004. The effects of thinning on the structural diversity of coppice forests. Ann. For. Sci. 61: 771-779.
26. Montes, F., Sánchez, M., del Río, M. & Cañellas, I. 2005. Using historic management records to characterize the effects of management on the structural diversity of forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 207: 279-293.
27. Montes, F., Pardos, M. & Cañellas, I. 2005. Using spatial statistics to asses the effects of silviculture on Scots pine even-aged stands structure and regeneration. Proceedings of the International IUFRO Conference Sustainable forestry in theory and practice, Edinburgh, UK.
28. Oldeman, R.A.A. 1990. Forest: Elements of silvology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, DE.
29. Pardos, M., Montes, F., Aranda, I. & Cañellas, I.2004. Influence of environmental conditions on scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) germinant survival and diversity in central Spain. Series of Conference Proceedings 1, Zentrum Wald-Forst-Holz Weihenstephan, Kloster Seeon, DE.
30. Pélissier, R. 1998. Tree spatial patterns in three contrasting plots of a southern Indian tropical moist evergrees forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 14: 1-16.
31. Picard, N. & Bar-Hen, A. 2002. La corrélation spatiale entre la surface terriére des arbres et leur accroissment est-elle un bon indicateur de la compétition. Ann. For. Sci. 59: 41-51.
32. Recher, H.F., Davis, W.E. & Calver, M.C. 2002. Comparative foraging ecology of five species of ground-pouncing birds in western Australian woodlands with comments on species decline. Ornithol. Sci. 1: 29-40.
33. Ripley, B.D. 1977. Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. 39: 172-212.
34. Ripley, B.D. 1981. Spatial statistics. Wiley, New York, NY, US.
35. Schurr F., Bossdorf O., Milton, S.J., Schumacher J. 2004. Spatial pattern formation in semi-arid shrubland: a priori predicted versus observed pattern, characteristics. Plant Ecol. 173: 271-282.
36. Wang, Z.F., Peng, S.L., Liu, S.Z. & Li, Z. 2003. Spatial pattern of Cryptocarya chinensis life stages in lower subtropical forest, China. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 44: 159-166.
37. Weber, J. 2000. Geostatistische Analyse der Struktur von Waldbeständen am Beispiel ausgewählter Bannwälder in Baden-Württemberg. Berichte Freiburger Forstliche Forschung Heft. FVA Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg, DE.
38. Wiegand, T. & Moloney, K.A. 2004. Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos 104: 209-229.