Experimental investigation on the separation of bentonite using ceramic membranes: Effect of turbulence promoters

Separation Science and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 286-309

  Hilal, Nidal ^a   Ogunbiyi, Oluwaseun O ^a   Miles, Nick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flux sustainability; Microfiltration; Static turbulence promoters; Tubular membranes

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC MEMBRANES; PERMEATION; POLARIZATION; PORE SIZE; SEPARATION; TURBULENCE;

FLUX SUSTAINABILITY; STATIC TURBULENCE PROMOTERS; TUBULAR MEMBRANES;

BENTONITE;

BENTONITE; CERAMIC MEMBRANES; PERMEATION; POLARIZATION; PORE SIZE; SEPARATION; TURBULENCE;

CERAMICS; FILTRATION; FOULING; HYDRODYNAMICS; PERMEABILITY;

EID: 38949107645     PISSN: 01496395     EISSN: 15205754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01496390701787438     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bilstad, T. and Yastebo, L. (2000) Recovery of clay by microfiltration. Desalination., 127(2): 177-180.
2. Jones, W.F., Valentine, R.L., and Rodgers, V.G.J. (1999) Removal of suspended clay from water using transmembrane pressure pulsed microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science., 157 (2): 199-210.
3. Benna, M., et al. (1999) Effect of pH on Theological properties of purified sodium bentonite suspensions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 218 (2): 442-455.
4. Benna, M., et al. (2001) Static filtration of purified sodium bentonite clay suspensions. Effect of clay content. Applied Clay Science., 19 (1-6): 103-120.
5. Gray, H.C.H. and Darley, G.R. (1980) Composition and Properties of Oil-Well Drilling Fluids, 6th edn.; Gulf Publishing Company: Houston, USA.
6. Krstic, D.M., Koris, A.K., and Tekic, M.N. (2006) Do static turbulence promoters have potential in cross-flow membrane filtration applications? Desalination., 191 (1-3): 371-375.
7. Millward, H.R., Bellhouse, BJ., and Walker, G. (1995) Screw-thread flow promoters: an experimental study of ultrafiltration and microfiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science., 106 (3): 269-279.
8. Howell, J.A., Field, R.W., and Wu, D. (1993) Yeast cell microfiltration: Flux enhancement in baffled and pulsatile flow systems. Journal of Membrane Science., 80 (1): 59-71.
9. Gupta, B.B., et al. (1995) A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science., 102: 31-42.
10. Krstic, D.M., et al. (2002) The effect of turbulence promoter on cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. Journal of Membrane Science., 208 (1-2): 303-314.
11. Ogunbiyi, O.O., Hilal, N., and Miles, N.J. (2008) The effects of performance and cleaning cycles of new tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with a model yeast suspension. Desalination., 220: 273-289.
12. Ogunbiyi, O.O., Hilal, N., and Miles, N.J. (2007) Comparison of different pitch lengths on static promoters for flux enhancement in tubular ceramic membrane. Separation Science and Technology., 42: 1945-1963.
13. Broussous, L., et al. (1998) Stamped ceramic porous tubes for tangential filtration. Separation and Purification Technology., 1.4 (1-3): 53-57.
14. Lojkine, M.H., Field, R.W., and Howell, J.A. (1992) Crossflow filtration of cell suspensions: a review of models with emphasis on particle size effects. Trans. I. Chem. E., 70: 149-164.
15. Hamachi, M. and Mietton-Peuchot, M. (2002) Analysis of deposit behaviour in crossflow microfiltration by means of thickness measurement. Chemical Engineering Journal., 86 (3): 251-257.
16. Ramirez, J.A. and Davis, R.H. (1998) Application of cross-flow microfiltration with rapid backpulsing to wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials., 63 (2-3): 179-197.
17. Tracey, E.M. and Davis, R.H. (1994) Protein fouling of track-etched polycarbonate microfiltration membranes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science., 167 (1): 104-116.