Removal of suspended clay from water using transmembrane pressure pulsed microfiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 157, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 199-210

  Jones, Wayne F ^a   Valentine, Richard L ^a   Rodgers, V G J ^a  

^a IA United States   (United States)

Author keywords

Backpulsing; Clay; Drinking water; Kaolin; Microfiltration; Transmembrane pressure pulsing

Indexed keywords

FOULING; KAOLIN; MICROFILTRATION; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; POLYSULFONES; POTABLE WATER; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SHEAR FLOW;

POLYETHERSULFONE; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURE PULSING (TPP);

WATER TREATMENT;

DRINKING WATER; KAOLIN;

CLAY; LIQUID-SOLID SEPARATION; MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; WATER;

ARTICLE; CLAY; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE FILTER; MICROFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 0033532339     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00376-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Lahoussine-Turcaud V., Weisner M.R., Bottero J.-Y. Fouling in tangential-flow ultrafiltration: the effect of colloid size and coagulation pretreatment. J. Membr. Sci. 52:1990;173-190.
2. Laîné J.-M., Clark M.M.et al. Ultrafiltration of lake water: effect of pretreatment on the partitioning of organics, THMFP, and flux. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 82(12):1990;82-87.
3. Miller K., Rodgers V.G.J. Reduction of membrane fouling in the presence of high polarization resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 76:1993;77-83.
4. V.G.J. Rodgers, Transmembrane pressure pulsing in portein ultrafiltration, D.Sc., Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri, 1989.
5. Rodgers V.G.J., Sparks R.E. Effect of solution properties of polarization redevelopment and flux in pressure pulsed ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 78:1993;163-180.
6. Rodgers V.G.J., Sparks R.E. Effect of transmembrane pressure pulsing on concentration polarization. J. Membr. Sci. 68:1992;149-168.
7. Rodgers V.G.J., Sparks R.E. Reduction of membrane fouling in the ultrafiltration of binary portein mixtures. AIChE J. 37 10:1991;1517-1528.
8. C. Wilharm, V.G.J. Rodgers, Significance of duration and amplitude in transmembrane pressure pulsed ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, J. Membr. Sci. (1996).
9. Redkar G.S., Davis R.H. Cross-flow microfiltration with high-frequency reverse filtration. AIChE J. 41(3):1995;501-508.
10. G. Johnson, I.G. Wenten, Control of Concentration Polarization, Fouling, and Protein Transmission of Microfiltration Processes within the Agro-Based Industry, Workshop ASEAN-EU on Membrane Technology in Agro-Based Industry, Kuala Lumpar, July 1994, pp. 157-166.
11. Parnham C.S., Davis R.H. Protein recovery from bacterial cell debris using crossflow microfiltration with backpulsing. J. Membr. Sci. 118:1996;259-268.
12. Kuberkar V., Czekaj P., Davis R. Flux enhancement for membrane filtration of bacterial suspensions using high-frequency backpulsing. Biotech. Bioeng. 60:1999;77-87.
13. Ramirez J.A., Davis R.H. Application of cross-flow microfiltration with rapid backpulsing to wastewater treatment. J. Haz. Mat. 63:1999;179-197.
14. AWWA, Lyonnaise des Eaux, and Water Research Commission of South Africa (1996), Water Treatment Membrane Processes, McGraw Hill, New York.
15. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96:1994;1-58.
16. J.G. Jancangelo, International Report: The Development of Membrane Technology, Proceedings of the 1991 Congress on IWSA, Copenhagen, Denmark.