Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 201-219

  van den Bos, Kees ^a   Ham, Jaap ^a   Lind, E Allan ^b   Simonis, Marieke ^a   van Essen, Wiljo J ^a   Rijpkema, Mark ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fairness; Human alarm system; Justice; Outcomes; Procedures

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849188024     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 2 (1965), Academic Press, New York 267-299
2. Barrett-Howard E., and Tyler T.R. Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 296-304
3. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1458-1463
4. Blau P.M. Exchange and power in social life (1964), Wiley, New York
5. Brockner J., Heuer L., Siegel P.A., Wiesenfeld B., Martin C., Grover S., et al. The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 394-407
6. Brockner J., and Wiesenfeld B.M. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120 (1996) 189-208
7. Callejas A., Lupianez J., and Tudela P. The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. Brain and Cognition 54 (2004) 225-227
8. Carter C.S., Macdonald A.M., Botvinick M., Ross L.L., Stenger V.A., Noll D., et al. Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97 (2000) 1944-1948
9. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., and Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. (2003), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
10. Cook R.D. Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19 (1977) 15-18
11. Cropanzano R., Goldman B., and Folger R. Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (2003) 1019-1024
12. De Cremer D., and Sedikides C. Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 157-173
13. De Cremer D., and Tyler T.R. Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 37 (2005), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 151-218
14. De Waal F. Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals (1996), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Satpute, A. B. (in press). Personality from a controlled processing perspective: An fMRI study of neuroticism, extraversion, and self-consciousness. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience.
16. Eisenberger N.I., and Lieberman M.D. Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 294-300
17. Eisenberger N.I., Lieberman M.D., and Williams K.D. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science 302 (2003) 290-292
18. Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Moller, A. C., Friedman, R., & Meinhardt, J. (in press). Color and psychological functioning: The effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
19. Fazio R.H. A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In: Hendrick C., and Clark M.S. (Eds). Research methods in personality and social psychology (1990), Sage, Newbury Park, CA 74-97
20. In: Folger R. (Ed). The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (1984), Plenum, New York
21. Folger R. Fairness as deonance. In: Gilliland S., Steiner D., and Skarlicki D. (Eds). Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (2001), Information Age Publishers, Greenwich, CT 3-33
22. Folger R., and Cropanzano R. Organizational justice and human resource management (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
23. Folger R., Cropanzano R., and Goldman B. What is the relationship between justice and morality?. In: Greenberg J., and Colquitt J.A. (Eds). Handbook of organizational justice: Fundamental questions about fairness in the workplace (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 215-246
24. Folger R., Rosenfield D., Grove J., and Corkran L. Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 2253-2261
25. Folger R., and Skarlicki D.P. A popcorn metaphor for employee aggression. In: Griffin R., O'Leary-Kelly A., and Collins J. (Eds). Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent behavior in organizations Vol. 1 (1998), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 43-82
26. Greenberg J. Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54 (1993) 81-103
27. Greene J.D., Nystrom L.E., Engell A.D., Darley J.D., and Cohen J.D. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44 (2004) 389-400
28. Greene J.D., Sommerville B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., and Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293 (2001) 2105-2108
29. Hafer C.L. Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000) 165-173
30. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 814-834
31. Ham, J., & Van den Bos, K. (submitted for publication). On the automaticity of justice knowledge activation.
32. Hays W.L. Statistics. 3rd ed. (1981), Holt-Saunders, New York
33. Hogg M.A. Uncertainty and extremism: Identification with high entitativity groups under conditions of uncertainty. In: Yzerbyt V., Judd C.M., and Corneille O. (Eds). The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (2004), Psychology Press, New York 401-418
34. Hogg M.A. Uncertainty, social identity and ideology. In: Thye S.R., and Lawler E.J. (Eds). Advances in group processes Vol. 22 (2005), Elsevier, New York 203-230
35. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., and Thaler R.H. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business 59 (1986) 285-300
36. Kirk R.E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. (1995), Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA
37. Klein D.F. Panic disorder and agoraphobia: Hypothesis hothouse. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 57 (1996) 21-27
38. Lang P.J., Greenwald M.K., Bradley M.M., and Hamm A.O. Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology 30 (1993) 261-273
39. Lerner M.J. The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality 45 (1977) 1-52
40. Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion (1980), Plenum Press, New York
41. Lerner M.J. The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 (2003) 388-399
42. Leung K., Tong K.-K., and Ho S.S.-H. Effects of interactional justice on egocentric bias in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 405-415
43. Leventhal G.S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K.J., Greenberg M.S., and Willis R.H. (Eds). Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (1980), Plenum, New York 27-54
44. Liddell B.J., Brown K.J., Kemp A.H., Barton M.J., Das P., Peduto A., et al. A direct brainstem-amygdala-cortical 'alarm' system for subliminal signals of fear. Neuroimage 24 (2005) 235-243
45. Lieberman M.D. Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. In: Forgas J.P., Williams K.P., and Von Hippel W. (Eds). Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 44-67
46. Lieberman M.D., and Eisenberger N.I. The neural alarm system: Behavior and beyond. Reply to Ullsperger et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 446-447
47. Lieberman M.D., Gaunt R., Gilbert D.T., and Trope Y. Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 34 (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 199-249
48. Lind E.A. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: Greenberg J., and Cropanzano R. (Eds). Advances in organizational behavior (2001), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 56-88
49. Lind E.A., Greenberg J., Scott K.S., and Welchans T.D. The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (2000) 557-590
50. Lind E.A., Kanfer R., and Earley P.C. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990) 952-959
51. Lind E.A., and Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice (1988), Plenum, New York
52. Loseman, A., Van den Bos, K., & Ham, J. (2006). The social psychology of justice as a self-related process. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Social Justice Research, Berlin, Germany.
53. Maas, M., & Van den Bos, K. (submitted for publication). An affective-experiential perspective on reactions to fair and unfair events: Effects of individual differences in affect intensity moderated by experiential mindsets.
54. McGregor I. Zeal, identity, and meaning: Going to extremes to be one self. In: Greenberg J., Koole S.L., and Pyszczynski T. (Eds). Handbook of experimental existential psychology (2004), Guilford Press, New York 182-199
55. McGregor I., Zanna M.P., Holmes J.G., and Spencer S.J. Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 472-488
56. Miedema J., Van den Bos K., and Vermunt R. The influence of self-threats on fairness judgments and affective measures. Social Justice Research 19 (2006) 228-253
57. Mikula G. Some observations and critical thoughts about the present state of justice theory and research. In: Gilliland S., Steiner D., Skarlicki D., and van den Bos K. (Eds). What motivates fairness in organizations (2005), Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT 197-210
58. Montada L. Justice: Just a rational choice?. Social Justice Research 12 (1998) 81-101
59. Montada L. Doing justice to the justice motive. In: Ross M., and Miller D.T. (Eds). The justice motive in everyday life (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 41-62
60. Moorman R.H., and Byrne Z.S. How does organizational justice affect organizational citizenship behavior?. In: Greenberg J., and Colquitt J.A. (Eds). Handbook of organizational justice: Fundamental questions about fairness in the workplace (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 355-380
61. Murray S.L. Regulating the risks of closeness: A relationship-specific sense of felt security. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (2005) 74-78
62. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2005). The relational signature of felt security. Paper presented at the 2005 Conference of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, San Diego, USA.
63. Murray S.L., Holmes J.G., and Griffin D.W. Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (2000) 478-498
64. Murray S.L., Holmes J.G., MacDonald G., and Ellsworth P.C. Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 1459-1480
65. Murray S.L., Rose P., Bellavia G.M., Holmes J.G., and Garrett Kusche A. When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 556-573
66. Posner M.I., and Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 13 (1990) 25-42
67. Steiner, D. D., Guirard, S., & Baccino, T. (1999, May). Cognitive processing of procedural justice information: Application of the Oculometer. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
68. Strack F., and Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004) 220-247
69. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 2nd ed. (1989), Harper & Row, New York
70. Thibaut J., and Kelley H.H. The social psychology of groups (1959), Wiley, New York
71. Tillfors M. Why do some individuals develop social phobia? A review with emphasis on the neurobiological influences. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 58 (2004) 267-276
72. Tyler T.R. Why people obey the law (2006), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
73. Tyler T.R., and Lind E.A. A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 25 (1992), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 115-191
74. Van den Bos K. Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 931-941
75. Van den Bos, K. (in press). Hot cognition and social justice judgments: The combined influence of cognitive and affective factors on the justice judgment process. In D. de Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
76. Van den Bos, K., & Rijpkema, M. (2007). Studying effects of exclamation point primes using functional neuroimaging. Unpublished manuscript.
77. Van den Bos, K., Miedema, J., & Vermunt, R. (submitted for publication). Exploring how people respond to conflicts between self-interest and fairness: The influence of threats to the self on reactions to advantageous inequity.
78. Van den Bos K., Heuven E., Burger E., and Fernández Van Veldhuizen M. Uncertainty management after reorganizations: The ameliorative effect of outcome fairness on job uncertainty. International Review of Social Psychology 19 (2006) 75-86
79. Van den Bos K., and Lind E.A. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 34 (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-60
80. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Volume 2 - From theory to practice (pp. 49-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Van den Bos K., Lind E.A., Vermunt R., and Wilke H.A.M. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 1034-1046
82. Van den Bos K., and Miedema J. Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000) 355-366
83. Van den Bos K., Poortvliet P.M., Maas M., Miedema J., and Van den Ham E.-J. An enquiry concerning the principles of cultural norms and values: The impact of uncertainty and mortality salience on reactions to violations and bolstering of cultural worldviews. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 91-113
84. Van den Bos K., and Van Prooijen J.-W. Referent cognitions theory: The role of closeness of reference points in the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 616-626
85. Van den Bos K., Vermunt R., and Wilke H.A.M. Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 95-104
86. Van den Bos K., Wilke H.A.M., Lind E.A., and Vermunt R. Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 1493-1503
87. Van Prooijen J.-W., Karremans J.C., and Van Beest I. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: How approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 686-697
88. Watson D., Clark L.A., and Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988) 1063-1070