Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 331-349

  Clopper, Cynthia G ^a   Pisoni, David B ^b   Tierney, Adam T ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexical competition; Spoken word recognition; Talker variability; Task demands

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33750634296     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bilger RC. (1984) Speech recognition test development. Am Speech Hear Assoc Rep 14:2-15.
2. Black JW. (1957) Multiple-choice intelligibility tests. J Speech Hear Disord 22:213-235.
3. Clopper CG, Pisoni DB. (2001) Effects of response format in spoken word recognition tests: speech intelligibility scores obtained from open-set, closed-set, and delayed response tasks. In: Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 25. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, 254-265.
4. Craik FIM, Kirsner K. (1974) The effect of speaker's voice on word recognition. Q J Exp Psychol 26:274-284.
5. Creelman CD. (1957) Case of the unknown talker. J Acoust Soc Am 29:655.
6. Dirks DD, Takayanagi S, Moshfegh A. (2001) Effects of lexical factors on word recognition among normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 12:233-244.
7. Egan JP. (1948) Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 58:955-991.
8. Fairbanks G. (1958) Test of phonemic differentiation: the rhyme test. J Acoust Soc Am 30:596-600.
9. Foster JR, Haggard MP. (1987) The Four Alternative Auditory Feature test (FAAF) - linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. Br J Audiol 21:165-174.
10. Gelfand SA. (1998) Optimizing the reliability of speech recognition scores. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1088-1102.
11. Gelfand SA, (2003) Tri-word presentations with phonemic scoring for practical high-reliability speech recognition assessment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:405-412.
12. Goh W. (2005) Talker variability and recognition memory: instance-specific and voice-specific effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog 31:40-53.
13. Goldinger SD. (1996) Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:1166-1183.
14. Goldinger SD, Luce PA, Pisoni DB. (1989) Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: effects of competition and inhibition. J Mem Lang 28:501-518.
15. Grosjean F. (1980) Spoken word recognition and the gating paradigm. Percept Psychophys 28:267-283.
16. Hirsh I, Davis H, Silverman SR, Reynolds E, Eldert E, Benson RW. (1952) Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord 17:321-337.
17. Hood JD, Poole JP. (1980) Influence of the speaker and other factors affecting speech intelligibility. Audiology 19:434-455.
18. Horii Y, House AS, Hughes GW. (1970) A masking noise with speech-envelope characteristics for studying intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 49:1849-1856.
19. House AS, Williams CE, Hecker MHL, Kryter KD. (1965) Articulation-testing methods: consonantal differentiation with a closed-set response. J Acoust Soc Am 37:158-166.
20. Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RC. (1997) Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:1395-1405.
21. Kucera F, Francis W. (1967) Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
22. Luce PA, Pisoni DB. (1998) Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear 19:1-36.
23. Marslen-Wilson WD. (1984) Function and process in spoken word recognition: a tutorial review. In: Bouma H, Bouwhis DG, eds. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 125-150.
24. McLennan CT, Luce PA. (2005) Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:306-321.
25. Miller GA. (1946) Articulation testing methods. In: Transmission and Reception of Sounds under Combat Conditions. Washington, DC: Division 7, National Defense Research Committee, 69-80.
26. Mullennix JW, Pisoni DB, Martin CS. (1989) Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 85:365-378.
27. Murphy GL. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Norris D. (1994) Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52:189-234.
29. Nusbaum HC, Pisoni DB, Davis CK. (1984) Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. In: Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, 357-376.
30. Nyang EE, Rogers CL, Nishi K. (2003) Talker and accent variability effects on spoken word recognition. Poster presented at the 145th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Nashville, TN.
31. Nygaard LC, Sommers MS, Pisoni DB. (1994) Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychol Sci 5:42-46.
32. Owens E, Kessler DK, Telleen CC, Schubert ED. (1981) The Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) battery. Hear Aid J (September):9.
33. Palmeri TJ, Goldinger SD, Pisoni DB. (1993) Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken vowels. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19:309-328.
34. Pisoni DB, Nusbaum HC, Luce PA, Slowiaczek LM. (1985) Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Commun 4:75-95.
35. Pollack I, Rubenstein H, Decker L. (1959) Intelligibility of known and unknown message sets. J Acoust Soc Am 31:273-279.
36. Schultz MC, Schubert ED. (1969) A multiple-choice discrimination test. Laryngoscope 79:382-399.
37. Sommers MS, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB. (1997) Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners I: the effects of response format. Ear Hear 18:89-99.
38. Sumby WH, Pollack I. (1954) Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 26:212-215.
39. Takayanagi S, Dirks DD, Moshfegh A. (2002) Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:585-597.
40. Treisman M. (1978) Space or lexicon? The word frequency effect and the error response frequency effect. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 17:37-59.
41. Verbrugge RR, Strange W, Shankweiler DP, Edman TR. (1976) What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space? J Acoust Soc Am 60:198-212.
42. Walden BE. (1984) Validity issues in speech recognition testing. Am Speech Hear Assoc Rep 14:16-18.