An artificial aptazyme-based riboswitch and its cascading system in E. coli

ChemBioChem

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 206-209

  Ogawa, Atsushi ^a   Maeda, Mizuo ^a  

^a INST OF PHYS AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aptazymes; Cascading system; Gene expression; Riboswitches; Ribozymes

Indexed keywords

APTAZYME; ENZYME; LUCIFERASE; MESSENGER RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; DNA TRANSPOSITION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIBOSOME; RIBOSWITCH; RNA BINDING; RNA DEGRADATION; THERMODYNAMICS; THERMOSTABILITY;

APTAMERS, NUCLEOTIDE; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GENES, REPORTER; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; RIBOSOMES; RNA, BACTERIAL;

EID: 38849166047     PISSN: 14394227     EISSN: 14397633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200700478     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. W. C. Winkler, R. R. Breaker, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 59, 487-517.
2. Recently riboswitches were also discovered in eukaryotic cells, see for example: M. T. Cheah, A. Wachter, N. Sudarsan, R. R. Breaker, Nature 2007, 447, 497-501.
3. a) W. C. Winkler, A. Nahvi, R. R. Breaker, Nature 2002, 419, 952-956;
4. b) A. Serganov, Y. R. Yuan, O. Pikovskaya, A. Polonskaia, L. Malinina, A. T. Phan, C. Hobartner, R. Micura, R. R. Breaker, D. J. Patel, Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1729-1741.
5. a) W. C. Winkler, A. Nahvi, N. Sudarsan, J. E. Barrick, R. R. Breaker, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 701-707;
6. b) M. Mandal, R. R. Breaker, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 29-35.
7. W. C. Winkler, A. Nahvi, A. Roth, J. A. Collins, R. R. Breaker, Nature 2004, 428, 281-286.
8. a) G. Werstuck, M. R. Green, Science 1998, 282, 296-298;
9. b) D. Grate, C. Wilson, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2565-2570;
10. c) I. Harvey, P. Garneau, J. Pelletier, RNA 2002, 8, 452-463;
11. d) B. Suess, S. Hanson, C. Berens, B. Fink, R. Schroeder, W. Hillen, Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 1853-1858;
12. e) B. Suess, B. Fink, C. Berens, R. Stentz, W. Hillen, Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1610-1614;
13. f) S. K. Desai, J. P. Gallivan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13247-13254.
14. S. A. Lynch, S. K. Desai, H. K. Sajja, J. P. Gallivan, Chem. Biol. 2007, 14, 173-184.
15. S. Topp, J. P. Gallivan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6807-6811.
16. a) L. Yen, J. Svendsen, J.-S. Lee, J. T. Gray, M. Magnier, T. Baba, R. J. D'Amato, R. C. Mulligan, Nature 2004, 431, 471-476;
17. b) K. M. Thompson, H. A. Syrett, S. M. Knudsen, A. D. Ellington, BMC Biotechnol. 2002, 2, 21.
18. A. Ogawa, M. Maeda, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3156-3160.
19. a) G. A. Soukup, R. R. Breaker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3584-3589;
20. b) G. A. Soukup, G. A. M. Emilsson, R. R. Breaker, J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 298, 623-632.
21. R. R. Breaker, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 31-39.
22. 2+ concentration did not affect the ON/OFF efficiency, although it affects the activity of the hammerhead ribozyme in vitro.
23. The only difference in the experimental conditions between the ON and OFF states is the concentration of theophylline, so that the ON/ OFF efficiencies obtained depend only on the effect of theophylline concentration.
24. [6f,7,8,9b]
25. 2+ is 0 mM.
26. V. Noireaux, R. Bar-Ziv, A. Libchaber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 12672-12677.
27. [10]