PET kinetic analysis: Error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-11

  Ikoma, Yoko ^a   Watabe, Hiroshi ^a   Shidahara, Miho ^b   Naganawa, Mika ^b,c   Kimura, Yuichi ^b  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Compartmental model; Error analysis; PET

Indexed keywords

ARTERY; COMPARTMENT MODEL; HUMAN; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOISOTOPE DILUTION TECHNIQUE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 38849158431     PISSN: 09147187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-007-0083-2     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Kety SS. The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues. Pharmacol Rev 1951;3:1-41.
2. 18F]fluorodeoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization in man. Circ Res 1979;44:127-137.
3. Mintun MA, Raichle ME, Kilbourn MR, Wooten GF, Welch MJ. A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1984;15:217-227.
4. Watabe H, Ikoma Y, Kimura Y, Naganawa M, Shidahara M. PET kinetic analysis: compartmental model. Ann Nucl Med 2006;20:583-588.
5. 11C]flumazenil kinetics for the estimation of ligand transport rate and receptor distribution using positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991;11:735-744.
6. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
7. Luenberger DG. Optimization by vector space methods. New York: Wiley; 1969. p. 271-311.
8. Marquardt DW. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J Soc Ind Appl Math 1963;2:431-441.
9. 11C]DAA1106. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:173-184.
10. 11C-Verapamil transfer at the human blood-brain barrier for evaluation of P-glucoprotein function. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1531-1537.
11. Ikoma Y, Toyama H, Yamada T, Uemura K, Kimura Y, Senda M, et al. Creation of a dynamic digital phantom and its application to a kinetic analysis. Kaku Igaku 1998;35:293-303.
12. Feng D, Ho D, Chen K, Wu LC, Wang JK, Liu RS, et al. An evaluation of the algorithms for determining local cerebral metabolic rates of glucose using positron emission tomography dynamic data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:697-710.
13. Ichise M, Toyama H, Innis RB, Carson RE. Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1271-1281.
14. Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wolf AP, Dewey SL, Schlyer DJ, et al. Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1990;10:740-747.
15. Kimura Y, Naganawa M, Shidahara M, Ikoma Y, Watabe H. PET kinetic analysis: pitfall and solution for Logan plot. Ann Nucl Med 2007;21:1-8.
16. Slifstein M, Laruelle M. Effects of statistical noise on graphic analysis of PET neuroreceptor studies. J Nucl Med 2000;41:2083-2088.
17. Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Ding YS, Wang GJ, Alexoff DL. A strategy for removing the bias in the graphical analysis method. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:307-320.
18. Varga J, Szabo Z. Modified regression model for the Logan plot. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:240-244.
19. Carson RE. PET parameter estimation using linear integration methods: bias and variability consideration. In: Uemura K, Lassen NA, Jones T, Kanno I, editors. Quantification of brain function: tracer kinetics and image analysis in brain PET. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1993. p. 499-507.
20. Ogden RT. Estimation of kinetic parameter in graphical analysis of PET imaging data. Stat Med 2003;22:2557-2568.
21. Burger C, Buck A. Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1818-1823.
22. 11C]FLB457 binding to extrastriatal dopamine receptors in the human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:1164-1173.
23. Carson RE, Yan Y, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Freedman N, Bacharach SL, Herscovitch. An approximation formula for the variance of PET region-of-interest values. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993;12:240-250.
24. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage 1996;4:153-158.
25. Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Alexoff DL. Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:834-840.
26. Hume SP, Myers R, Bloomfield PM, Opacka-Juffry J, Cremer JE, Ahier RG, et al. Quantitation of carbon-11-labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography. Synapse 1992;12:47-54.
27. 11C]raclopride studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16:42-52.
28. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Hume SP, Cunningham VJ. Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. Neuroimage 1997;6:279-287.
29. Wu Y, Carson RE. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1440-1452.
30. Ichise M, Ballinger JR, Golan H, Vines D, Luong A, Tsai S, et al. Noninvasive quantification of dopamine D2 receptors with Iodine-123-IBF SPECT. J Nucl Med 1996;37(3):513-520.
31. 11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:1096-1112.
32. 11C]McN5652. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:490-501.
33. Sokoloff L, Reivich M, Kennedy C, Des Rosiers MH, Patlak CS, Pettigrew KD, et al. The [14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat. J Neurochem 1977;28:897-916.
34. Phelps ME, Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, Selin C, Sokoloff L, Kuhl DE. Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F-18)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: validation of method. Ann Neurol 1979;6:371-388.
35. 18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose/PET data. J Nucl Med 1989;30:1483-1488.
36. 18F-FDG brain PET. Kaku Igaku 1997;34:25-34.
37. Huang SC, Yu DC, Barrio JR, Grafton S, Melega WP, Hoffman JM. Kinetics and modeling of L-6-[18F]fluoro-DOPA in human positron emission tomographic studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991;11:898-913.
38. Hoshi H, Kuwabara H, Leger G, Cumming P, Guttman M, Gjedde A. 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA metabolism in living human brain: a comparison of six analytical methods. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993;13:57-69.
39. Cumming P, Gjedde A. Compartmental analysis of Dopa decarboxylation in living brain from dynamic positron emission tomograms. Synapse 1998;29:37-61.
40. Huang SC, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Sideris K, Selin CJ, Kuhl DE. Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man. Am J Physiol 1980;238:E69-E82.
41. Carson RE, Huang SC, Green MV. Weighted integration method for local cerebral blood flow measurements with positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1986;6:245-258.
42. Blomqvist G. On the construction of functional maps in positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1984;4:629-632.
43. Kimura Y, Naganawa M, Yamaguchi J, Takabayashi Y, Uchiyama A, Oda K, et al. MAP-based kinetic analysis for voxel-by-voxel compartment model estimation: detailed imaging of the cerebral glucose metabolism using FDG. Neuroimage 2006;29:1203-1211.
44. Turkheimer FE, Aston JA, Banati RB, Riddell C, Cunningham VJ. A linear wavelet filter for parametric imaging with dynamic PET. IEEE Trans Medical Imaging 2003;22:289-301.
45. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data: generalizations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:584-590.
46. Lucignani G, Schmidt KC, Moresco RM, Striano G, Colombo F, Sokoloff L. Measurement of regional cerebral glucose utilization with fluorine-18-FDG and PET in heterogeneous tissue: theoretical considerations and practical procedure. J Nucl Med 1993;34:360-369.
47. Yu DC, Huang SC, Barrio JR, Phelps ME. The assessment of the non-equilibrium effect in the "Patlak analysis" of Fdopa PET studies. Phys Med Biol 1995;40:1243-1254.
48. Millet P, Delforge J, Pappata S, Syrota A, Cinotti L. Error analysis on parameter estimates in the ligand-receptor model: application to parameter imaging using PET data. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:2739-2756.
49. 11C]raclopride: optimization and signal-tonoise considerations. J Nucl Med 2000;41:522-530.
50. Turkheimer F, Sokoloff L, Bertoldo A, Lucignani G, Reivich M, Jaggi JL, et al. Estimation of compartment and parameter distribution in spectral analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:1211-1222.
51. Kukreja SL, Gunn RN. Bootstrapped DEPICT for error estimation in PET functional imaging. Neuroimage 2004;21:1096-1104.
52. Ogden RT, Tarpey T. Estimation in regression models with externally estimated parameters. Biostatistics 2006;7:115-129.
53. Ogden RT, Ojha A, Erlandsson K, Oquendo MA, Mann JJ, Parsey RV. In vivo quantification of serotonin transporters using [(11)C]DASB and positron emission tomography in humans: modeling considerations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:205-217.
54. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
55. Buvat I. A non-parametric bootstrap approach for analyzing the statistical properties of SPECT and PET images. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:1761-1775.