Indiana University's Kelley school of business uses integer programming to form equitable, cohesive student teams

Interfaces

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 265-276

  Cutshall, Rex ^a   Gavirneni, Srinagesh ^b   Schultz, Kenneth ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAS Institute Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Education systems; Integer; Operations; Programming

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849151672     PISSN: 00922102     EISSN: 1526551X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/inte.1060.0248     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alexander, S., M. Ruderman. 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Soc. Justice Res. 1(2) 177-198.
2. Ancona, D. G., D. E. Caldwell. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3) 321-341.
3. Baker, B., C. Benn. 2001. Assigning pupils to tutor groups in a comprehensive school. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52(6) 623-629.
4. Baker, K. R., S. G. Powell. 2002. Methods for assigning students to groups: A study of alternative objective functions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(4) 397-404.
5. Champion, M. A., G. J. Medsker, A. C. Higgs. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psych. 46(4) 823-850.
6. Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter, K. Y Ng. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3) 425-145.
7. Farh, J., P. M. Podsakoff, D. W Organ. 1990. Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. J. Management 16(4) 705-721.
8. Fourer, R. 1997. Uses of the AMPL modeling language in solving "balanced" assignment problems. Proc. EURO/ INFORMS-97, Barcelona, Spain. http://iems.northwestern. edu/~4er/SLIDES/bcn9707v.pdf.
9. Gilliland, S. W. 1994. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. J. Appl. Psych. 79(5) 691-701.
10. Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4) 499-517.
11. Goodman, P. S., E. C. Ravlin, L. Argote. 1986. Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. P. S. Goodman, ed. Designing Effective Work Groups. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1-27.
12. Hackman, J. R. 1987. The design of work teams. J. W. Lorsch, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 314-324.
13. O'Reilly, C. A., III, D. F. Caldwell, W P. Barnett. 1989. Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(1) 21-37.
14. Pearce, J. A., E. C. Ravlin. 1987. The design and activation of selfregulating work groups. Human Relations 40(11) 751-782.
15. Richard, O. C., S. L. Kirby. 1998. Women recruits' perceptions of workforce diversity program selection decisions: A procedural justice examination. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 28(2) 183-188.
16. Tziner, A., D. Eden. 1985. Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? J. Appl. Psych. 70(1) 85-93.
17. Weiss, H. M., K. Suckow, R. Cropanzano. 1999. Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. J. Appl. Psych. 84(5) 786-794.
18. Weitz, R. R., S. Lakshminarayanan. 1998. An empirical comparison of heuristics methods for creating maximally diverse groups. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49(6) 635-646.